[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support

From: Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...>
Date: 2007-02-21 19:46:58 UTC
List: ruby-core #10389
hi,

Thanks for looking into the patch

On 2007-02-22 04:16:04 +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> At Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:57:05 +0900,
> Marcus Rueckert wrote in [ruby-core:10387]:
> > +VENDOR_DIR="`eval \"echo ${vendordir}\"`"
> 
> This results empty on NetBSD.

oh. as it was included in macports i thought it will work on bsds. I
will remember it for further patches.

> > +case "$target_os" in
> > +  cygwin*|mingw*|*djgpp*|os2_emx*)
> 
> os2-emx, not os2_emx.

i guess they copied it from somewhere and i just kept it. :)

> > Index: mkconfig.rb
> > +  if defined?(VENDOR_SPECIFIC) && VENDOR_SPECIFIC
> > + 	CONFIG["sitearch"] = CONFIG["vendorarch"]
> > + 	CONFIG["sitedir"] = CONFIG["vendordir"]
> > + 	CONFIG["sitelibdir"] = CONFIG["vendorlibdir"]
> > + 	CONFIG["sitearchdir"] = CONFIG["vendorarchdir"]
> > +  end
> 
> It should be done in mkmf.rb.

wouldnt it mean we need to duplicate the handling in mkrf than?
so far the patch didnt require any changes to mkrf.

> > Index: lib/mkmf.rb
> > +int #{func}();
> > +/*top*/
> > +int main() { return 0; }
> > +int t() { #{func}(); return 0; }
> > +SRC
> 
> This change seems harmful.

ok. we can remove the chunk i guess.

> > Index: instruby.rb
> >  archlibdir = CONFIG["archdir"]
> >  sitelibdir = CONFIG["sitelibdir"]
> >  sitearchlibdir = CONFIG["sitearchdir"]
> > +vendorlibdir = with_destdir(CONFIG["vendorlibdir"])
> > +vendorarchlibdir = with_destdir(CONFIG["vendorarchdir"])
> 
> Wrong usage of with_destdir.

ok.

> And we have to take care of {bcc32,win{32,ce}}/Makefile.sub too.

i will try to look into those. but i dont have experience with those.

thanks again for looking into the patch. :)

    darix

-- 
          openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
              openSUSE is good for you
                  www.opensuse.org

In This Thread