[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Can't seem to run tests?

From: Steven Lumos <steven@...>
Date: 2007-02-13 17:38:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #10292
"Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi there,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the correct list to ask this (let me know and
> I'll scoot off to ruby-talk) but I'm having some issues with the
> running make test-all with the ruby source. I'd like to start
> experimenting with an idea I have for an RCR. The source (r11708)
> compiles fine, but make test has 44 failures and make test-all doesn't
> run anything at all:
> farrel@nicodemus ~/Projects/ruby $ make test-all
> ./miniruby  ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb"
> --basedir="./test" --runner=console
> "./ruby ./test/runner.rb --basedir=./test --runner=console"
> Loaded suite .
> Started
>
> Finished in 0.000201 seconds.
>
> 0 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
>
> Is there another make directive I should be using?
>
> Thanks
> Farrel

Did you disable extensions by chance? The targets I (think I) know
about are:

 test: runs ./rubytest.rb, which runs ./sample/test.rb and filters the results
 test-all: runs unit tests for all extensions that have them
 check: test then test-all

If you disabled extensions, which seems a reasonable thing to do if
you are hacking on ruby, then test-all should do nothing.

Steve


In This Thread