[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released

From: "David Symonds" <dsymonds@...>
Date: 2007-02-27 00:43:19 UTC
List: ruby-core #10432
On 2/25/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the second preview of Ruby 1.8.6 has
> been released.

Attached is a very small documentation-related patch for the Base64
standard library class. The #b64encode method (probably little-used)
was confusingly documented, and tripped me up at least once.


Dave.

Attachments (1)

base64-patch.diff (332 Bytes, text/x-diff)
--- lib/base64.rb.orig	2007-02-27 11:38:35.000000000 +1100
+++ lib/base64.rb	2007-02-27 11:39:54.000000000 +1100
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
   #
   #    require 'base64'
   #    data = "Now is the time for all good coders\nto learn Ruby" 
-  #    puts Base64.b64encode(data)
+  #    Base64.b64encode(data)
   #
   # <i>Generates:</i>
   #

In This Thread