[#10157] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>
Ola Bini schrieb:
[#10167] SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Simple question: what SVN revision corresponds to the 1.8.5_p12 release?
[#10185] Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
I have been preparing a release of Transaction::Simple 1.4 and want to
[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
David Flanagan wrote:
Daniel Berger wrote:
On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Quoting david@davidflanagan.com, on Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:10:52AM +0900:
On 2/7/07, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Hi,
On 2/6/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi --
On 2/6/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10230] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
[#10254] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8538, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:25
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:25:43AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10255] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8539, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:27
[#10257] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8541, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:31
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:31:48AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10259] Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "z wen" <zhimin.wen@...>
Hi
Hell,
Hello,
On 2/10/07, Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@nifty.ne.jp> wrote:
[#10276] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
[#10284] Can't seem to run tests? — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>
Hi there,
[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:10:37AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:38:50AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:10:37AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10290] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>
Hello,
Those are not errors. Username and password are not allowed in HTTP
[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09
Hi,
On 5/12/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 5/12/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/
> -----Original Message-----
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:33 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:49 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:33:08 +0900,
On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's
James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:
James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Alex Young wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:08 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10334] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>
Hi,
[#10341] matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>
Matz, Mr. Musha, and All,
[#10357] Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
[#10372] Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>
Has anyone ever suggested adding a stateful I/O multiplexing interface which
[#10387] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...>
Hi,
[#10397] Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...>
While trying to install a Rails app on my Mac (10.4 Tiger), I ran into
[#10413] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...>
Hello!
Sorry for misformatting. This time it should be OK (enclosed in
It appears as if the debugger doesn't support 'b file.rb:25', but it
[#10414] Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
On 2/24/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10420] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>
Hi,
Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> writes:
[#10437] MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
Could someone who has bleeding-edge Ruby installed please test the
[#10442] Latest Update to RHG — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
I am releasing the lastest version of the Ruby Hacker's Guide.
Hi,
[#10445] PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) : rdebug.el — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...>
Hello,
This is a patch against trunk that also changes ./misc/README. The patch
[#10446] Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>
Does anyone think Array#join with a block is a potential RCR?
Re: String.ord
Hi --
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 2/6/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
>> Hi --
>>
>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>>
>> > On 2/6/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Both having ordAt(index) or making String#ord to return codepoint of
>> >> the first character are trivial. We have to evaluate pros and cons
>> >> first.
>> >
>> > Like the fact that #ordAt isn't a very Rubyish name. I really
>> > appreciate the fact that the core and standard libraries use very
>> > consistent naming schemes, where most methods have only one word in
>> > them, thus avoiding the whole
>> >
>> came-case-versus-internal-upcasing-versus-lowline-separating-naming-scheme
>> > holy-war.
>>
>> There are quite a few multi-word methods (respond_to?, values_at,
>> to_i, instance_methods, etc.), all with the underscore style. I agree
>> there's no "war" aspect to it, but there's definitely a traditional
>> style.
>
> What I meant was that it seems that people have been clever enough to
> avoid multi-word methods as far as possible, so that there really
> never has to be a discussion about it. I know that the naming
> conventions are camel-case for constants and lowlines for everything
> else, but I realized early while reading through the early
> documentation that every method seemed to have a very good single-word
> name.
irb(main):006:0> Object.new.methods.size
=> 40
irb(main):007:0> Object.new.methods.grep(/_/).size
=> 17
I guess __send__ and __id__ shouldn't count :-) It's still a large
percentage, though. I don't think anyone's ever tried to avoid
multi_word methods, except maybe when they get too big (though that
can be handy too, in cases like instance_variable_get where the
bigness draws attention to the possible inelegance of using the
method).
David
--
Q. What is THE Ruby book for Rails developers?
A. RUBY FOR RAILS by David A. Black (http://www.manning.com/black)
(See what readers are saying! http://www.rubypal.com/r4rrevs.pdf)
Q. Where can I get Ruby/Rails on-site training, consulting, coaching?
A. Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypal.com)