[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

ruby1.8 case-insensitive matches fail when using hex escapes

From: Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>
Date: 2007-02-27 18:17:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #10443
This must be a bug, all the following regular expressions should be
equivalent, but aren't:

% /usr/local/svn-ruby-1.8/bin/ruby -e 's="\x62".upcase; p(s =~ /\x42/i); p(s =~ /\x62/i); p(s =~ /#{"\x62"}/i); p(s =~ /[\x62]/i);'
0
nil
0
0

They are equivalent in ruby1.9:

sroberts@pebble:~/s/ruby/svn-ruby-trunk% /usr/local/svn-ruby-trunk/bin/ruby -e 's="\x62".upcase; p(s =~ /\x42/i); p(s =~ /\x62/i); p(s =~ /#{"\x62"}/i); p(s =~ /[\x62]/i);'
0
0
0
0

sroberts@pebble:~/s/ruby/svn-ruby-trunk% /usr/local/svn-ruby-trunk/bin/ruby --version                                                                        ruby 1.9.0 (2007-02-28 patchlevel 0) [i686-linux]
sroberts@pebble:~/s/ruby/svn-ruby-trunk% /usr/local/svn-ruby-1.8/bin/ruby --version
ruby 1.8.6 (2007-02-28 patchlevel 5000) [i686-linux]


In This Thread

Prev Next