[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Can I check this in for 1.8.6? (Was: Another .document patch)

From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Date: 2007-02-16 03:03:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #10331
OK, approved.

At Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:27:59 +0900,
Eric Hodel wrote:
> 
> I lost track of the day :/
> 
> I've got this patch and another to suppress RDoc for prettyprint.rb's
> tests consisting entirely of # :nodoc: lines.
> 
> On Jan 31, 2007, at 06:49, Hugh Sasse wrote:
> 
> > I have been looking at the tips for irb at:
> >
> > http://wiki.rubygarden.org/Ruby/page/show/Irb/TipsAndTricks
> >
> > and I wanted to see what else I could do, how they worked etc.
> > I noticed that I managed to miss the irb subdirectory out of
> > the big .document patch I sent in for the 1.8.5 release.
> > This is a patch against that release, mainly because so far
> > I have been unable to build subversion on Solaris9, so I can't
> > get at the 1_8 branch that easily.
> >
> > With regard to that: is there a possibility that nightly tarballs
> > could be made of the branches?
> >
> > Anyway, the patch is below.
> >         Thank you
> >         Hugh

-- 
                     /
                    /__  __            Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
                   / )  )  ) )  /     FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp

"Different eyes see different things,
    Different hearts beat on different strings --
       But there are times for you and me when all such things agree"

In This Thread