[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: stable branch policy & schedule for 1.8.6

From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2007-02-05 16:23:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #10192
On Feb 5, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

> Sorry for the delay.
>
> At Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:58:28 +0900,
> MenTaLguY wrote:
>> On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 15:16 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
>>> Thanks, I'll take a good look at it.  In addition to the patch,  
>>> do you
>>> have or know of a good test suite for threads that intensively makes
>>> use of threads and mutexes?
>>
>> No, only some unit tests which attempt to test the basic  
>> properties of
>> mutexes, condition variables, etc.  Beyond those, I have relied on
>> reports from people using fastthread in production situations.
>>
>> -mental
>
> Instead of completely replacing the stock implementation, I'm thinking
> of making it a configure option to start with.  If no one objects,
> I'll integrate fastthread into ruby_1_8 in a few days and enable it by
> default to encourage testing.  After having a couple of preview
> release cycles, I'll make a final decision as to if the 1.8.6 final
> release should have it enabled by default.
>
> Opinions, anybody?

I think you have a very good plan.

James Edward Gray II

In This Thread