[#37959] [Bug:trunk] I can modify literals — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>

遠藤です。

13 messages 2009/02/10

[#38005] Is URI.decode() broken? — MOROHASHI Kyosuke <moronatural@...>

もろはしです。いつもお世話になっております。

39 messages 2009/02/14
[#38006] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/02/14

なかだです。

[#38009] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/02/14

成瀬です、

[#38016] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — Fujioka <fuj@...> 2009/02/15

xibbarこと藤岡です。

[#38017] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/02/15

成瀬です。

[#38040] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...> 2009/02/17

NARUSE, Yui さんは書きました:

[#38124] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/03/03

成瀬です。

[#39214] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — akira yamada / やまだあきら <akira@...> 2009/09/02

(2009年03月03日 22:45), NARUSE, Yui さんは書きました:

[#39218] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2009/09/02

成瀬です。

[#39236] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/09/05

In article <4A9E44DD.6050706@airemix.jp>,

[#39242] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2009/09/07

小崎@思いつきを適当に書いてみるテスト

[#39246] Re: Is URI.decode() broken? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/09/07

In article <20090907091830.2C7A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>,

[#38096] 多重代入やメソッド引数の展開でto_aが呼ばれます — nagachika <nagachika00@...>

nagachika と申します。

10 messages 2009/02/26

[#38098] ブロック引数と括弧・引数なしsuper — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

前田です。

12 messages 2009/02/27

[ruby-dev:37993] Re: [ruby-core:22028] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics

From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Date: 2009-02-13 06:35:14 UTC
List: ruby-dev #37993
Engine Yard が1.8.6のメンテナンスをしたいと言ってきてるんですが、反対の人いま
す? 個人的には渡りに船なのでお願いしようかなと思うんですが。

Ezra Zygmuntowicz さんは書きました:
> 
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> In message "Re: [ruby-core:22024] Re: 1.8.7 Specifics"
>>    on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:35:39 +0900, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org>
>> writes:
>>
>> |Have you considered pushing official responsibility for 1.8.6 out
>> |to some of the commercial organizations benefiting most from it?
>> |Let them fix bugs, incrementally enhance performance and endlessly QC
>> |while your small team of core developers explore the new frontier.
>>
>> The current 1.8.6 maintainer Shyouhei sitting next to me right now,
>> just said he'd happy to pass maintenance responsibility if one is
>> willing.  So, in case, some one or some organization have interest,
>> let us know.
>>
>>                             matz.
> 
> 
> Matz & Shyouhei
> 
>     We at Engine Yard would be honored to take over as maintainers of
> ruby1.8.6. We have a lot of customers using it and have a vested
> interest in keeping it around and patched with latest security and
> efficiency related patches without changing any apis and keeping in line
> with what folks expect from a stable ruby1.8.6.
> 
>     Please let us know how you would like to proceed, feel free to
> contact me offlist as well.
> 
> Thank You.
> 
> Ezra Zygmuntowicz
> ez@engineyard.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


In This Thread

Prev Next