[#360221] Its a bird, its a plane, its.. um, an Attribute based System? — thunk <gmkoller@...>

15 messages 2010/04/01

[#360275] combined ranges... — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>

Anybody know if there's an easy way to accomplish the equivalent of

26 messages 2010/04/02
[#360276] Re: combined ranges... — David Springer <dnspringer@...> 2010/04/02

Will this work:

[#360283] Re: combined ranges... — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2010/04/02

David Springer wrote:

[#360285] Re: combined ranges... — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2010/04/02

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:

[#360331] ThunkGen released! — Andrea Dallera <andrea@...>

Ahem...

98 messages 2010/04/03

[#360366] $SAFE=0 for setuid? — Rick Ashton <expiation@...>

Hi

17 messages 2010/04/04
[#360378] Re: $SAFE=0 for setuid? — Jonathan Nielsen <jonathan@...> 2010/04/04

> From most documentation I see that $SAFE is automatically set to 1 if

[#360381] Re: $SAFE=0 for setuid? — Rick Ashton <expiation@...> 2010/04/04

Jonathan Nielsen wrote:

[#360418] Novice school teacher seeking help in programming — Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@...>

I will like to know how to use programming languages to create a

20 messages 2010/04/05
[#360419] Re: Novice school teacher seeking help in programming — Jes俍 Gabriel y Gal疣 <jgabrielygalan@...> 2010/04/05

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@gmail.com> wrote:

[#360420] Re: Novice school teacher seeking help in programming — Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@...> 2010/04/05

Jes炭s Gabriel y Gal叩n wrote:

[#360595] modifying a Hash in one process when .each is running in another — Nathan <njmacinnes@...>

I want one process to continually loop through a list of objects (in

11 messages 2010/04/07
[#360597] Re: modifying a Hash in one process when .each is running in another — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/04/07

Nathan Macinnes wrote:

[#360598] Re: modifying a Hash in one process when .each is running in another — Nathan <njmacinnes@...> 2010/04/07

Thanks for the clarification... My application is network based, and

[#360651] Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — Intransition <transfire@...>

For the last couple of days I've been trying to write an Enumerable

28 messages 2010/04/07
[#360670] Re: Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — David Masover <ninja@...> 2010/04/08

On Wednesday 07 April 2010 04:49:15 pm Intransition wrote:

[#360784] Re: Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2010/04/09

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:51 AM, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:

[#360790] Re: Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — Intransition <transfire@...> 2010/04/09

[#360898] Re: Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/04/11

On 04/09/2010 08:53 PM, Intransition wrote:

[#360935] Re: Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2010/04/12

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Robert Klemme

[#360945] Re: Is it possible, a fully general Enumerable#recursive ? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/04/12

2010/4/12 Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com>:

[#360760] The Ruid Concept, with question — thunk <gmkoller@...>

The Ruid Concept

32 messages 2010/04/09

[#360783] Ruby-warrior : Teaching AI concepts with Ruby — Aldric Giacomoni <aldric@...>

I think this project doesn't get enough attention :-)

24 messages 2010/04/09

[#360910] attr_accessor, but for a boolean — Albert Schlef <albertschlef@...>

Let's say I have this code:

13 messages 2010/04/12

[#360981] Method to groom a string to floating point representation — Alex DeCaria <alex.decaria@...>

I have a program that asks for the user to enter a string that

16 messages 2010/04/13
[#360986] Re: Method to groom a string to floating point representation — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2010/04/13

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Alex DeCaria <alex.decaria@millersville.edu

[#360994] Re: Method to groom a string to floating point representation — Alex DeCaria <alex.decaria@...> 2010/04/13

Josh Cheek wrote:

[#361047] Re: Method to groom a string to floating point representation — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2010/04/14

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Alex DeCaria <alex.decaria@millersville.ed=

[#361015] How to find multiple matches in a string — Alex DeCaria <alex.decaria@...>

I know how to use regular expressions to find the first match of a

11 messages 2010/04/13

[#361038] I thought spaces didn't matter around operators — Sarah Allen <sarah@...>

I had understood that operators, like minus (-), had special "syntactic

15 messages 2010/04/13

[#361055] Who maintains ruby-talk? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>

Among other things, the ruby-talk MLM is rampant with security

70 messages 2010/04/14
[#361066] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/04/14

2010/4/14 Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com>:

[#361079] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2010/04/14

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Robert Klemme

[#361084] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2010/04/14

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com>wrote:

[#361138] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Justin Collins <justincollins@...> 2010/04/14

Tony Arcieri wrote:

[#361155] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2010/04/15

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Justin Collins <justincollins@ucla.edu>wrote:

[#361159] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...> 2010/04/15

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com>wrote:

[#361209] Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? — Walton Hoops <walton@...> 2010/04/15

On 4/15/2010 12:00 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote:

[#361141] Is this good OOP structuring? — Derek Cannon <novellterminator@...>

Hello everyone. I'm trying to get a hang of object-oriented programming

14 messages 2010/04/15
[#361157] Re: Is this good OOP structuring? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/04/15

On 15.04.2010 02:46, Derek Cannon wrote:

[#361242] Re: Is this good OOP structuring? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2010/04/15

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Robert Klemme

[#361254] Re: Is this good OOP structuring? — Derek Cannon <novellterminator@...> 2010/04/16

>class CourseController

[#361279] Writing a parser — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

Hello there,

18 messages 2010/04/16

[#361322] iconv transfer code — Pen Ttt <myocean135@...>

in my computer(ubuntu9.1+ruby1.9):

14 messages 2010/04/17
[#361372] Re: iconv transfer code — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/04/18

Pen Ttt wrote:

[#361366] Elegant Solution to a Seemingly Simple Problem? — Derek Cannon <novellterminator@...>

Hello everyone. It's me: Derek, again! Sorry for writing a novel here,

12 messages 2010/04/18

[#361396] ruby 1.9+ , floats, and decimal — botp <botpena@...>

> 0.2-0.1

18 messages 2010/04/19
[#361399] Re: ruby 1.9+ , floats, and decimal — Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@...> 2010/04/19

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, botp <botpena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#362518] Re: ruby 1.9+ , floats, and decimal — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2010/05/11

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Christopher Dicely <cmdicely@gmail.com> wrote:

[#361454] DrX, an object inspector — "Mooffie n/a" <mooffie@...>

DrX is an object inspector (and a source-code browser).

32 messages 2010/04/20
[#361470] Re: [ANN] DrX, an object inspector — David Espada <davinciSINSPAM@...> 2010/04/20

El martes 20 de abril, Mooffie n/a escribi坦:

[#361504] Re: DrX, an object inspector — "Mooffie n/a" <mooffie@...> 2010/04/21

David Espada wrote:

[#361459] [RFC] Proposing a Ruby Packaging Standard — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>

Hello,

34 messages 2010/04/20
[#361487] Re: [RFC] Proposing a Ruby Packaging Standard — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...> 2010/04/20

Hi,

[#361528] Ruby 1.9.1, Threads and "[BUG] The handle is invalid." — John Briggs <aazman.w@...>

Hi!

11 messages 2010/04/21

[#361587] Best way to write this method? — Derek Cannon <novellterminator@...>

Could my code below be more Ruby-esque or simpler (using Ruby methods I

13 messages 2010/04/22
[#361625] Re: Best way to write this method? — Derek Cannon <novellterminator@...> 2010/04/23

If you guys need some better clarification as to what these methods do:

[#361631] Re: Best way to write this method? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/04/23

2010/4/23 Derek Cannon <novellterminator@gmail.com>:

[#361688] Segmentation fault at raise exception. — O01eg Oleg <o01eg@...>

I get segfault at any Ruby exception with C API:

13 messages 2010/04/24

[#361755] Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Raul Parolari <raulparolari@...>

I am using Ruby (as a prototype version) to communicate with a network

27 messages 2010/04/26
[#361833] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/27

On 4/25/10, Raul Parolari <raulparolari@gmail.com> wrote:

[#361845] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Raul Parolari <raulparolari@...> 2010/04/27

Caleb Clausen wrote:

[#361888] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/28

On 4/27/10, Raul Parolari <raulparolari@gmail.com> wrote:

[#365061] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Raul Parolari <raulparolari@...> 2010/06/30

I have some final results on the problem described.

[#365070] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2010/06/30

[#365078] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Raul Parolari <raulparolari@...> 2010/06/30

Roger Pack wrote:

[#365091] Re: Networking: select() blocks for seconds (> timeout) — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2010/06/30

[#361896] Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — Alex DeCaria <alex.decaria@...>

I've seen several examples on this forum where folks have used

22 messages 2010/04/28
[#361897] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — Dave Baldwin <dave.baldwin@3dlabs.com> 2010/04/28

[#361916] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — Siep Korteling <s.korteling@...> 2010/04/29

Dave Baldwin wrote:

[#361917] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2010/04/29

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Siep Korteling <s.korteling@gmail.com> wrote:

[#361921] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — hemant <gethemant@...> 2010/04/29

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:

[#361930] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2010/04/29

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, hemant <gethemant@gmail.com> wrote:

[#361932] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — hemant <gethemant@...> 2010/04/29

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wro=

[#361936] Re: Use of STDOUT.flush after puts — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2010/04/29

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:25 PM, hemant <gethemant@gmail.com> wrote:

[#361962] Return values of modifiers — Michel Demazure <michel@...>

This is logical, but no very useful :

22 messages 2010/04/30
[#361968] Re: Return values of modifiers — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/04/30

2010/4/30 Michel Demazure <michel@demazure.com>:

[#361970] Re: Return values of modifiers — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2010/04/30

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#361976] Re: Return values of modifiers — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2010/04/30

Hi --

[#361978] Re: Return values of modifiers — Michel Demazure <michel@...> 2010/04/30

David A. Black wrote:

[#362010] Re: Return values of modifiers — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/04/30

Sure, it would be nice while/until loops return value of the last iteration,

[#361963] Switching dynamically between methods (inside modules) — "Paul A." <cyril.staff@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2010/04/30

[#361983] Inverse of stream parser — Brian Candler <b.candler@...>

I plan to parse a huge XML document (too big to fit into RAM) using a

14 messages 2010/04/30

[#361989] Cann't require UTF-8 files. — O01eg Oleg <o01eg@...>

When I require file with UTF-8 encoding I get error:

14 messages 2010/04/30
[#361997] Re: Cann't require UTF-8 files. — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/04/30

On 4/30/10, O01eg Oleg <o01eg@yandex.ru> wrote:

[#362008] Setting to Ruby 1.9 in Ubuntu... — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...>

I tried installing a bunch of ruby 1.9 stuff on my Ubuntu laptop last night, but

15 messages 2010/04/30
[#362009] Re: Setting to Ruby 1.9 in Ubuntu... — Walton Hoops <walton@...> 2010/04/30

On 4/30/2010 1:36 PM, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail wrote:

Re: Its a bird, its a plane, its.. um, an Attribute based System?

From: thunk <gmkoller@...>
Date: 2010-04-02 21:55:14 UTC
List: ruby-talk #360282
Defining "these things" may not be as simple as it may seem.  Some of
the complications include:

1.  There are multiple TYPES -  3 that I have used, and more that I
can see clear reasons for.
2.  I have repeated that they are a text file, that has a common
family Module, and a Class, all three so I'm not sure what that tells
anybody.
3.  There are SECTIONS (tarzan speak?) - and each one corresponds to a
DSL.  No big whoop here, that's been pointed out already.
4.  They Rendezvous (tarzan speak?) for? connect up with something I
call a "HelperClass" (more Tarzan? - Ruleby uses this phrase also)
.....
.....
5.  They do things with the HelperClass - by using methods (what else)
and those methods COULD DO ANYTHING - bounce light off the Moon - how
am I to speak to that...  it is OPEN.

6. There is a BLACKBOX kind of thing (from the aircraft analogy) - and
THIS thing automatically records (stack of strings) every detail of
every "transaction"

7.  The DSLs take turns going down the Sections.... depending on type.

8.  The "BlackBox" is for details, the automatic things, like
retrieving variables from someplace and giving it a name, or not
finding it and aborting, like that.   The WhiteBoard is for more
specialized communications - between "swarms" and such.  It is proving
very useful and is what I should be working on right now....

9.  The atomic units are "fired!" in a pre-determined pattern, and
they pick up some real flexibility from this, as one "pass" can leave
information for the next "pass" and so on - all common sense - but it
could seem a little foreign at first, but it is natural to our
thinking, the Taliban attacked the Germans today using a 1-2-3 plan -
small arms, then a mine - then, some scheise, different day - but
there is STRENGTH in this that seems amazing to this old programmer.
amazing and Fun.


...................
....................

But "what do it do?????"  -  one type of particular importance - by
numbers / not ability ?    Defines Attributes, Makes Assertions, and
Arrives at a "Conclusion" (tarzan?)

--------------------
.....................

I have NEVER made fantastical claims for this system: but what I see
as particularly powerful in my batShit Crazy world -

Is this:  These units are / can be created by NOTHING MORE THAN
FILLING OUT SOMETHING I WOULD CALL A "FORM" - lots of multiple
choices, and NOT much else.
Sorry, I can't think of a better name - using WEE I came up with a
system of presenting an "Expert" with this "FORM" one SECTION at a
time.

Nothing exciting there?  Maybe not, but I thought it was "kinda cool"
that everything NEEDED TO CREATE THE FORMS comes from using REFLECTION
on the various other components.

So - it sorta "free floats" / autoadjusts / self - reflecticates -
whatever - but you don't have to worry because it all works from
various tricks of Ruby Goodness.

So - now whats so useful about that???

Think about it, you have a simple form that is on-line 24-7 for
anybody anywhere anytime to add a new unit to your system - he
"authors it" - it is becomes a "atomic unit" in your system - to do
what you want.

I wrote up something I called "Capturing the Aluminum Moment" on my
wiki - not because if DEFINEs   much but because it is some of the
thought about this whole thing.

There is also another "revelation" or two that came to ME from working
with this thing - one is that the whole system could self-evolve
(tarzan speak?) with nothing more than adding HELPER_CLASSES  and
Methods to these Classes.

This sounds like the technical write up link to ABS but it is full of
'c' era stuff and doesn't smell of goodness.

ABS is the best clue yet, about what "this is" but I don't believe it
ends there.  Not because of some sort of plan, but just because Ruby
is so Good.




In This Thread