[#362083] Teaching Programming Languages (including Ruby) — Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller@...>

Hello,

20 messages 2010/05/02

[#362098] Main working window for Ruby is DOS? — Kaye Ng <sbstn26@...>

I know nothing about programming and am not a techy person, so please

16 messages 2010/05/03

[#362116] School teacher still at it learning programming language — Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@...>

Now I while glimpsing at the beauty of Ruby, there is the software of

11 messages 2010/05/03

[#362166] Something I expected to work, but didn't! — Kurtis Rainbolt-greene <kurtisrainboltgreene@...>

irb(main):001:0> x = 2

11 messages 2010/05/04

[#362215] for-in vs. map closures — Mike Austin <mike_ekim@...>

I was experimenting with closures and JavaScript's and Ruby's

11 messages 2010/05/05

[#362286] ri on sqlite — Intransition <transfire@...>

What do others think of a creating a new ri tool which uses a SQLite

17 messages 2010/05/06

[#362341] ease of porting (translating) ruby to C (vs. python)? — bwv549 <jtprince@...>

In a very small bioinformatics group I know of, they are deciding

17 messages 2010/05/07

[#362375] Strings iteration — Viorel <viorelvladu@...>

I have some names like aaxxbbyy where xx is '01'..'10' and yy is also

14 messages 2010/05/08

[#362425] Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...>

Have apps moved over to the web (or GUI) totally ? Will there be any

21 messages 2010/05/10
[#362441] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — botp <botpena@...> 2010/05/10

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:13 PM, R. Kumar <sentinel.2001@gmx.com> wrote:

[#362448] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...> 2010/05/10

interface and/or the installation itself is terrible.

[#362458] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — botp <botpena@...> 2010/05/10

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, R. Kumar <sentinel.2001@gmx.com> wrote:

[#362460] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...> 2010/05/10

botp wrote:

[#362463] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...> 2010/05/10

Strange. I cant push a gem even after yanking.

[#362452] Unit Test of method calling system() - how? — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

How can I unit test the two methods:

16 messages 2010/05/10

[#362498] In Ruby, can the coerce() method know what operator it is th — Jian Lin <blueskybreeze@...>

In Ruby, it seems that a lot of coerce() help can be done by

12 messages 2010/05/11
[#362546] Re: In Ruby, can the coerce() method know what operator it is th — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/11

On 5/10/10, Jian Lin <blueskybreeze@gmail.com> wrote:

[#362611] Re: In Ruby, can the coerce() method know what operator it is th — Colin Bartlett <colinb2r@...> 2010/05/12

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> wrote:

[#362657] Asynchronous HTTP request — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com>

Does anyone know how to do the following, but without threads, purely

28 messages 2010/05/13

[#362718] Range on strings. — Vikrant Chaudhary <nasa42@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2010/05/14

[#362787] class best way for getters ? — unbewusst.sein@... (Une B騅ue)

i have a class "HFSFile" initialized by a parsed string

12 messages 2010/05/15

[#362979] curl library? — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...>

Two questions:

14 messages 2010/05/18
[#362980] Re: curl library? — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...> 2010/05/18

On 10-05-18 02:35 PM, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail wrote:

[#362982] Re: curl library? — Luis Parravicini <lparravi@...> 2010/05/18

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and

[#362984] Re: curl library? — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...> 2010/05/18

Well, I got that -dev thing installed with apt-get, and then I tried again and

[#363027] Retrieve instance — Walle Wallen <walle.sthlm@...>

Quick question. Can I somehow retrieve the instance of the class Test in

11 messages 2010/05/19

[#363076] Scrape javascript content — Phil Mcdonnell <phil.a.mcdonnell@...>

I'm trying to scrape a page that hides some data behind a javascript

11 messages 2010/05/20

[#363115] OMG, why are there so many Strings in ObjectSpace! — timr <timrandg@...>

I was playing around looking at ObjectSpace in irb and was astounded

14 messages 2010/05/21

[#363225] Redefine a Class? — Mark T <paradisaeidae@...>

Currently this raises: superclass mismatch for class Soda (TypeError)

12 messages 2010/05/25

[#363240] Funny IO.select behaviour — Dennis Nedry <dennis@...>

I've been debugging my full screen console ruby editor.

13 messages 2010/05/25

[#363348] Ruby as Client Side Language in Web Browser (replacing JS) — "Simone R." <k5mmx@...>

Hi everybody,

17 messages 2010/05/27

[#363412] A better way to write this function? — Jason Lillywhite <jason.lillywhite@...>

Here is my attempt at Newton's second law in Ruby:

14 messages 2010/05/28

[#363417] Interrupting the evaluation of a ruby script — Emmanuel Emmanuel <emmanuel.bacry@...>

This is my problem :

12 messages 2010/05/28
[#363447] Re: Interrupting the evaluation of a ruby script — Branden Tanga <branden.tanga@...> 2010/05/28

Emmanuel Emmanuel wrote:

[#363483] Re: Interrupting the evaluation of a ruby script — Emmanuel Emmanuel <emmanuel.bacry@...> 2010/05/29

[#363426] A complete beginners question — Ant Walliams <anthonywainwright@...>

Hi there,

19 messages 2010/05/28

[#363432] Dynamic SVG with Ruby/Tk — Yotta Meter <spam@...>

The example I'm looking for in regards to ruby/SVG differs from the

14 messages 2010/05/28

[#363467] Date.today problem on linux with Ruby 1.8.6 — Jarmo Pertman <jarmo.p@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2010/05/29

[#363524] enumerator problem in 1.9.1 — Bug Free <amberarrow@...>

The following line:

19 messages 2010/05/31
[#363528] Re: enumerator problem in 1.9.1 — botp <botpena@...> 2010/05/31

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Bug Free <amberarrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#363533] Re: enumerator problem in 1.9.1 — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/05/31

2010/5/31 botp <botpena@gmail.com>:

Re: ruby 1.9+ , floats, and decimal

From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2010-05-12 13:40:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #362601
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:05 PM, botp <botpena@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
>> Neither floats (regardless of base) nor rationals can represent all
>> real numbers. =A0Each pair of consecutive float values has an infinite
>> number of reals which fall in the crack between them. =A0Neither can
>> exactly represent irrational values including Pi, e, sqrt(2) etc. etc.
>
> i hope you are not exaggerating ;-)
> everyone knows that pi or e or sqt(2) or 1/3 cannot be express exactly
> in decimal form.

And the first three can't be represented numerically exactly in a
finite space in any base.


> the problem w current float representation is that they balk in plain
> and simple addition and subtraction operation :(
> can we not just fix that at least ?
>

If I knew how, I'd be on a private island somewhere.

Floats have been around for a long time, FORTRAN was born in 1954.
I've been programming for about 71% of FORTRANs life span, and been
keeping an eye on Computer Science since then.  Floats will always be
floats, and have the properties of floats.

Computer floats are really just the same kind of representation used
on slide rules with more digits.  The real use case for floats is to
represent numbers with a very wide range of magnitudes, from very
large to very small in a limited number of digits/bytes.  This is also
the purpose of scientific notation. Slide rule operators generally
work with a maximum of 3 digits, and slide rules had enough precision
to serve the purpose of engineers for decades.

When you add 1.2E10 and 9.9E-2 and only preserve only 3 digits you get
1.2E10.  With more digits theres still a point where a smaller addend
gets lost.

The properties of float representations have been studied for over 50
years, and although they are well understood by those who have
actually studied them, and IEEE has standardized their behavior, they
will always hold surprises to those who casually expect them to always
get the 'right' results.  It's not that the results aren't right, but
that they are sometimes surprising to a naive observer.


--=20
Rick DeNatale

Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick
Twitter: @RickDeNatale
WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale

In This Thread