From: Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@...>
Date: 2010-05-14T01:21:20+09:00
Subject: Re: idiomatic way to pass multiple Procs/lambdas/blocks

--000e0cd4a75cfc59d504867c252d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I like using symbols that identify named methods, personally

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@mac.com>wrote:

> I am working on a little syntactical sugar library for 0mq (networking
> library). One of the things I would like to provide is a set of asynchronous
>  send/recv methods for transmitting and receiving messages. The method
> signature would look something like this:
>
> def send message, timeout = -1, callback, errback
> end
>
> where...
>
> +timeout+ is the number of seconds to wait before triggering the +errback+
> Proc; -1 disables timeouts
>
> +callback+ is the Proc/method/lambda executed upon acknowledged completion
>
> +errback+ is the Proc/method/lambda executed upon timeout
>
>
> Ruby doesn't allow for passing multiple blocks to a method so I'm faced
> with passing Procs or methods.
>
> Is there a more idiomatic way to accomplish my intentions?
>
> cr
>
>
>


-- 
Tony Arcieri
Medioh! A Kudelski Brand

--000e0cd4a75cfc59d504867c252d--