From: "Vinícius Baggio Fuentes" <vinibaggio@...>
Date: 2010-05-18T01:12:07+09:00
Subject: Re: Bundler Groups

--0016e65b52eabcfa620486cc600c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I don't know, I have the same feeling. Also, even if you're in a production
environment and only do Bundler.require(:default, :production), for example,
other group's gem are still needed to be installed, which is something I
don't like very much (although it is necessary, according to Yehuda Katz
[1])

[1]: http://yehudakatz.com/2010/05/09/the-how-and-why-of-bundler-groups/


On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to ask a more specific question about Bundler, pertaining to
> it's concept of groups.
>
> Do others see this as being truly useful? Or do you agree with me that
> it will prove to be mostly a YAGNI, and in come cases could even have
> bad consequences, e.g. a requirement was in the test group that
> actually should have been in the production group.
>
> Or do you see truly important uses for them, and now that we have
> them, would be too inconvenient to live without?
>
>
>
>

--0016e65b52eabcfa620486cc600c--