From: Intransition Date: 2010-05-08T09:26:10+09:00 Subject: Re: ri on sqlite On May 7, 5:25 am, Gavin Sinclair wrote: > I've thought of it many times, but would never personally undertake > such a project. > > In addition to hoped-for speed, the motivating factor for me would be > deeper documentation knowledge. > > For instance, if you do 'ri String' now, you are told about all String > methods from any library you have installed, as if they were all > available all the time.  You're not told what you have to "require" to > get access to the various methods. This has been my feeling as well. I have started the project, but so far I only have it dumping the flat data into the database. I'm not sure I am doing it in the right place either. I need to consider what Eric has said and take that into account. (Eric, thanks for the direction.)