From: Robert Dober Date: 2010-05-06T23:28:56+09:00 Subject: Re: for-in vs. map closures On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote: I almost never use for in Ruby, it makes me feel more like I'm writing > C or BASIC, or Algol, or even FORTRAN. Ah, eventually I understand what "fornever" means. > > I always keep in mind that the order is 1. Make it run, 2. Make it > right, 3. Make it fast enough, 4. Make it small enough. > > 1 and 2 are mandatory, 3 and 4 depend on what enough means. I feel 4's importance is largely underestimated. Cheers R. -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it. -- Alan Kay