From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2010-05-16T01:36:49+09:00
Subject: Re: class best way for getters ?

2010/5/15 Une Bévue <unbewusst.sein@google.com.invalid>:
depends (I know this is too long, but anyway)

if no new keys can be added to @atts it is quite easy
http://pastie.org/961685

if keys can be added one might do this
http://pastie.org/961691

But it starts to become really interesting if methods can disappear.
Of course we could just use method_missing without defining a getter,
but having an observer on @atts that would add remove methods on the
receiver would be quite an elegant approach.
Unfamiliar with built in observers I have made a sketch of how I would
like to implement such a functionality here
http://pastie.org/961738

HTH
R.

> --
>  « Je suis sûr que la gaîté ambiguë du drôle de garçon qui a bu du
> whisky et fait le zèbre sur un vieux caïman à Noël dans le cañon, a été
> bénéfique à l'âme du poète blême, ainsi qu'à son cœur & cætera ! »
>  (© Jean-Paul Blanc)
>
>



-- 
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
-- Alan Kay