[#362083] Teaching Programming Languages (including Ruby) — Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller@...>

Hello,

20 messages 2010/05/02

[#362098] Main working window for Ruby is DOS? — Kaye Ng <sbstn26@...>

I know nothing about programming and am not a techy person, so please

16 messages 2010/05/03

[#362116] School teacher still at it learning programming language — Hilary Bailey <my77elephants@...>

Now I while glimpsing at the beauty of Ruby, there is the software of

11 messages 2010/05/03

[#362166] Something I expected to work, but didn't! — Kurtis Rainbolt-greene <kurtisrainboltgreene@...>

irb(main):001:0> x = 2

11 messages 2010/05/04

[#362215] for-in vs. map closures — Mike Austin <mike_ekim@...>

I was experimenting with closures and JavaScript's and Ruby's

11 messages 2010/05/05

[#362286] ri on sqlite — Intransition <transfire@...>

What do others think of a creating a new ri tool which uses a SQLite

17 messages 2010/05/06

[#362341] ease of porting (translating) ruby to C (vs. python)? — bwv549 <jtprince@...>

In a very small bioinformatics group I know of, they are deciding

17 messages 2010/05/07

[#362375] Strings iteration — Viorel <viorelvladu@...>

I have some names like aaxxbbyy where xx is '01'..'10' and yy is also

14 messages 2010/05/08

[#362425] Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...>

Have apps moved over to the web (or GUI) totally ? Will there be any

21 messages 2010/05/10
[#362441] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — botp <botpena@...> 2010/05/10

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:13 PM, R. Kumar <sentinel.2001@gmx.com> wrote:

[#362448] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...> 2010/05/10

interface and/or the installation itself is terrible.

[#362458] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — botp <botpena@...> 2010/05/10

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, R. Kumar <sentinel.2001@gmx.com> wrote:

[#362460] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...> 2010/05/10

botp wrote:

[#362463] Re: Any future for curses applications/toolkits like rbcurse ? — "R. Kumar" <sentinel.2001@...> 2010/05/10

Strange. I cant push a gem even after yanking.

[#362452] Unit Test of method calling system() - how? — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

How can I unit test the two methods:

16 messages 2010/05/10

[#362498] In Ruby, can the coerce() method know what operator it is th — Jian Lin <blueskybreeze@...>

In Ruby, it seems that a lot of coerce() help can be done by

12 messages 2010/05/11
[#362546] Re: In Ruby, can the coerce() method know what operator it is th — Caleb Clausen <vikkous@...> 2010/05/11

On 5/10/10, Jian Lin <blueskybreeze@gmail.com> wrote:

[#362611] Re: In Ruby, can the coerce() method know what operator it is th — Colin Bartlett <colinb2r@...> 2010/05/12

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> wrote:

[#362657] Asynchronous HTTP request — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com>

Does anyone know how to do the following, but without threads, purely

28 messages 2010/05/13

[#362718] Range on strings. — Vikrant Chaudhary <nasa42@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2010/05/14

[#362787] class best way for getters ? — unbewusst.sein@... (Une B騅ue)

i have a class "HFSFile" initialized by a parsed string

12 messages 2010/05/15

[#362979] curl library? — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...>

Two questions:

14 messages 2010/05/18
[#362980] Re: curl library? — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...> 2010/05/18

On 10-05-18 02:35 PM, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail wrote:

[#362982] Re: curl library? — Luis Parravicini <lparravi@...> 2010/05/18

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and

[#362984] Re: curl library? — Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail <xeno.campanoli@...> 2010/05/18

Well, I got that -dev thing installed with apt-get, and then I tried again and

[#363027] Retrieve instance — Walle Wallen <walle.sthlm@...>

Quick question. Can I somehow retrieve the instance of the class Test in

11 messages 2010/05/19

[#363076] Scrape javascript content — Phil Mcdonnell <phil.a.mcdonnell@...>

I'm trying to scrape a page that hides some data behind a javascript

11 messages 2010/05/20

[#363115] OMG, why are there so many Strings in ObjectSpace! — timr <timrandg@...>

I was playing around looking at ObjectSpace in irb and was astounded

14 messages 2010/05/21

[#363225] Redefine a Class? — Mark T <paradisaeidae@...>

Currently this raises: superclass mismatch for class Soda (TypeError)

12 messages 2010/05/25

[#363240] Funny IO.select behaviour — Dennis Nedry <dennis@...>

I've been debugging my full screen console ruby editor.

13 messages 2010/05/25

[#363348] Ruby as Client Side Language in Web Browser (replacing JS) — "Simone R." <k5mmx@...>

Hi everybody,

17 messages 2010/05/27

[#363412] A better way to write this function? — Jason Lillywhite <jason.lillywhite@...>

Here is my attempt at Newton's second law in Ruby:

14 messages 2010/05/28

[#363417] Interrupting the evaluation of a ruby script — Emmanuel Emmanuel <emmanuel.bacry@...>

This is my problem :

12 messages 2010/05/28
[#363447] Re: Interrupting the evaluation of a ruby script — Branden Tanga <branden.tanga@...> 2010/05/28

Emmanuel Emmanuel wrote:

[#363483] Re: Interrupting the evaluation of a ruby script — Emmanuel Emmanuel <emmanuel.bacry@...> 2010/05/29

[#363426] A complete beginners question — Ant Walliams <anthonywainwright@...>

Hi there,

19 messages 2010/05/28

[#363432] Dynamic SVG with Ruby/Tk — Yotta Meter <spam@...>

The example I'm looking for in regards to ruby/SVG differs from the

14 messages 2010/05/28

[#363467] Date.today problem on linux with Ruby 1.8.6 — Jarmo Pertman <jarmo.p@...>

Hello.

10 messages 2010/05/29

[#363524] enumerator problem in 1.9.1 — Bug Free <amberarrow@...>

The following line:

19 messages 2010/05/31
[#363528] Re: enumerator problem in 1.9.1 — botp <botpena@...> 2010/05/31

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Bug Free <amberarrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#363533] Re: enumerator problem in 1.9.1 — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2010/05/31

2010/5/31 botp <botpena@gmail.com>:

Re: Setting to Ruby 1.9 in Ubuntu...

From: Ken Bloom <kbloom@...>
Date: 2010-05-02 03:08:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #362074
On Sat, 01 May 2010 05:22:17 +0900, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and
Gmail wrote:

> Walton Hoops wrote:
>> On 4/30/2010 1:36 PM, Xeno Campanoli / Eskimo North and Gmail wrote:
>>> I tried installing a bunch of ruby 1.9 stuff on my Ubuntu laptop last
>>> night, but my default ruby is still 1.8.7.  Anybody know a regular
>>> method for setting to 1.9 on Ubuntu?  Perhaps this is an Ubuntu
>>> question, but presumably the best way is not always the Ubuntu
>>> way...???
>> The Ubuntu way is to run 'sudo update-alternatives --config ruby' and
>> 'sudo update-alternatives --config rubygems', or instead of calling
>> Ruby scripts with 'ruby', call them with 'ruby1.9' when you want them
>> run in 1.9.
>> 
>> Another solution that is available is Ruby Version Manager (RVM).  I've
>> never used RVM, so I can't say anything for or against it.
>> http://rvm.beginrescueend.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
> Thank you.  That didn't get me there, but I really appreciate the quick
> response, and that actually helps me in some other areas.
> 
> I got this:
> 
> root@rockhopper:~# update-alternatives --config ruby
> update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for ruby. root@rockhopper:~#
> update-alternatives --config rubygems update-alternatives: error: no
> alternatives for rubygems. root@rockhopper:~#
> 
> rvm in that guise is not on my apt purvey.  I appreciate the
> suggestions. Perhaps if it's this hard it's better to wait for the OSs
> to upgrade themselves anyway.  I just noticed the CentOS we use is way
> back to ruby 1.8.5.  I sure hope we stop using CentOS soon.  It is a
> dog, and wastes a lot of our time. Debian family stuff has it's
> problems, but for my work it seems to always come out as superior.

Ubuntu (and most other distributions) believe in having a default version 
of the language, so it isn't a matter of guesswork to know which version 
of Ruby is the default. As such, interpreted language versions aren't 
managed by the alternatives system. At some time in the future, they'll 
change the default to 1.9.x (after having a well-planned migration, and 
an understanding that 1.9.x is the preffered alternative in the 
community), but in the mean time you need to specify that you want ruby 
1.9.1 by using ruby1.9.1 as your shebang, and by typing the version on 
the command line.

(They treat gcc and python similarly. Perl 5's compatibility is so set in 
stone at this point that it doesn't need alternative versions on the same 
system, so the current version is always the default.)



-- 
Chanoch (Ken) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology.
http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/


In This Thread

Prev Next