From: andrew mcelroy <sophrinix@...>
Date: 2010-04-11T06:11:50+09:00
Subject: Re: The Ruid Concept, with question

--00163630f4c5dbd0f40483e85b41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, thunk <gmkoller@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > Andrew McElroy
>
>
> Was confident enough to announce to this group what he thought this
> was, right?
>
> There is no shame in giving some the benefit of the doubt they have
something up front.


> On his side there were kids needing piano lessons, and a SawsAll.  On
>
What the explicative are you talking about?
I don't have any children.
I do animal rescue and work on try ruby. That's as close as that gets to
what your talking about.


> my side, I was in total awe of his understanding of all this and he
> told me about Python and functions and Google and I made a lot of
> notes in a 15/20 minute conversation which.....  made sense to me.
>

Because python and google (which are off topic here) are real things.
They can be understood. Your boid/ruids are pretty much an ambiguous
religion.
Even time cube is more coherent.
There are no artifacts that can be observed. You might as well be screaming
about
an alien language you learned from light reflections off of titan.


>
> I was ready to drive to Hendersonville to meet him, as, yes, I rather
> old fashioned about who I trust.
>


> Given the way he is framing things that decision, in retrospect, seems
> like it makes sense.  Or?
>
> An ad hominem attack is quiet tempting right now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

The best thing you can do is unsubscribe from this list and get mental help.
Seriously, the symptoms you display are in the DSM-IV-TR.
This is no joke.


> Thunk
>
>

--00163630f4c5dbd0f40483e85b41--