From: Intransition <transfire@...>
Date: 2010-04-15T04:13:06+09:00
Subject: Re: Memoize and GC


On Apr 14, 7:02 am, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> What else do you want to handle?  My implementation [1] does also only
> consider size but I have also seen implementations that consider
> insertion or access time.  Personally I dislike those solutions
> because they might throw away stuff too early and make the
> implementation more complex.  The main point (resource control) is
> already achieved by limiting the size of a LRU map.

Fair enough, I just thought it would be nice to have the *option* of a
time-based cache.