From: Suraj Kurapati Date: 2010-04-21T14:01:25+09:00 Subject: Re: Proposing a Ruby Packaging Standard Thomas Sawyer wrote: > On Apr 20, 1:12 pm, Suraj Kurapati wrote: >> find my project's man/ directory from my project's executable in bin/! > > The standard approach would be something like: > > require 'rbconfig' > dir = Config::CONFIG['datadir'] > file = File.join(dir, 'man/man1/ember.1') Thanks. Based on this example, I found that there is a Config::CONFIG['mandir'] which tells us exactly where the system's man/ directory is located. > B/c of RubyGems there is an extension method that redirects to the the > appropriate place. > > Config.datadir("ember") RubyGems does not seem to provide that functionality on my system: sun@yantram ~> irb ## ruby 1.9.1p378 (2010-01-10 revision 26273) [i686-linux] >> require 'rbconfig' => true >> Config.datadir("ember") NoMethodError: undefined method `datadir' for RbConfig:Module from (irb):2 from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `
' >> require 'rubygems' => false >> Config.datadir("ember") NoMethodError: undefined method `datadir' for RbConfig:Module from (irb):4 from /usr/bin/irb:12:in `
' >> Gem::VERSION => "1.3.6" > But I think it might be a problem to tell which is which for locating > the man/ directory. I guess RubyGems provides a Config.mandir(the_gem_name) method to do this? >> Also, if I provide a man/ directory in my gem/tarball package like this: >> >> man/ >> └── man1 >>     ├── ember.1 >>     └── ember.1.html > > Can man handle .html? Nope. That's just there as a backup, in case a user is on Windoze or their system somehow lacks the `man` command. `man` does warn me about it though when searching for manpages in my man/ directory: man: warning: man/man1/ember.1.html: ignoring bogus filename But I think it's worthy trade-off to have a HTML version available. > I glanced at the entries in my system and I > noticed they are all gzipped (ending in .gz). Thanks for the tip. I've gzipped my Roff manpage now. >> Will it be copied into /usr/share/man/ by RubyGems/setup.rb/Rip and >> friends? > > Setup.rb does. RubyGems does not. Not sure about Rip. Will RubyGems ever follow the FHS style of installation like setup.rb? Will setup.rb ever follow the keep-everything-together RubyGems style? What installation style will this Ruby Packaging Standard follow? So many questions... Life was easier when I only used RubyGems. :-/ -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.