From: thunk <gmkoller@...>
Date: 2010-04-06T03:15:09+09:00
Subject: Re: ThunkGen released!



ahhhh,

The point about "satz" could have been lost, so sorry.  Let's say this
super succinctly:

satz are just simple "hashes"
satz follow simple conventions
satz hang out in methods in an array with their siblings

satz are understandable by computers -

satz make for much more interesting output than the report-writers
written by thunk in circa 1982 - (for mcGraw-hill) AS they can be
turned into
Techlish or TechDeutsch or you name it - the valuable stuff are
symbols and those symbols are keys to the a yet unexplored land (for
the author anyway)....

and the author looked up tuples a couple of times now and they don't
make sense to him.  and since this works, and since is silly simple,
and since he is seeing what he calls "worksheets" which elbow past
"reports" and consider themselves to be of another nature than reports
- reports have been done - oh wow,  but the author could really write
a book on that.

not to over-advertise on these satz!  no.  they just are making the
worksheets do things the author never thought he could do before.  try
turning a bunch of rdms stuff into readable sentences?!?  has MS found
a way to do that?  then its not the MS the author knew.

thunktocktor