From: Tony Arcieri Date: 2010-04-16T12:27:38+09:00 Subject: Re: Who maintains ruby-talk? --000e0cdf16604d3ea60484523129 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also, thunk enjoyed making off topic posts to otherwise legitimate threads. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Tony Arcieri wrot= e: > Yes, unfortunately that doesn't seem to work correctly with the multiple > inboxes feature. > > 2010/4/15 Oddmund Str=F8mme > > > Tony Arcieri writes: > > > > > Hi, yes, you got it right. I read ruby-talk via e-mail. Given my > > present > > > method of reading ruby-talk (via Gmail) it's been extremely distracti= ng > > and > > > hindered my ability to read other mailing lists. I use Gmail's > multiple > > > inbox feature to filter out mailing lists I'm subscribed to, and "hig= h > > > traffic" threads get priority, even if it's the same person sending > > dozens > > > of messages to a single thread. > > > > > > Perhaps the method by which you read ruby-talk differs, but given my > > present > > > mode of reading the list, thunk threads are eating up valuable > > second-inbox > > > space. > > > > You are aware of GMail's =91mute conversation=92 functionality, yes? > > > > -- > > oddmund > > > > > > > -- > Tony Arcieri > Medioh! A Kudelski Brand > --=20 Tony Arcieri Medioh! A Kudelski Brand --000e0cdf16604d3ea60484523129--