From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2010-04-24T06:30:48+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby require problem

On Apr 23, 4:21 pm, Pablo Escobar <int...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't get it. Why doesn't ruby have just require/include for
> relative paths as it is in java, python etc. ?
> What's wrong? it's already 1.9 version which lacks these VERY basic
> and usual feature. Explain me plz.

When asking question about ruby behaviors, provide a sample of code
that shows the issue and include the corresponding backtrace.

Ruby allows require to relative paths, 1.9 has require_relative.

Please help us help you better
--
Luis Lavena