From: James Britt <james.britt@...>
Date: 2010-04-22T08:30:13+09:00
Subject: Re: Proposing a Ruby Packaging Standard

James Edward Gray II wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, James Britt wrote:
> 
>> If I were to want a default default (so to speak) I'd prefer the task listing rather than kicking off something.
> 
> I don't think I'm for recommending a default, but listing the tasks definitely wouldn't be my first choice.  That's a function of Rake itself (rake -T), so I would hate to waste a task on it.  That's just my opinion.
> 

Yeah, it's not like it isn't already there, it's just that if I type 
'rake', I'd rather something useful but benign happen instead of a 
message about there being no 'default' defined.

But either way I don't want to inadvertently kick off some potentially 
lengthy process.


-- 
James Britt

www.jamesbritt.com           - Playing with Better Toys
www.ruby-doc.org             - Ruby Help & Documentation
www.rubystuff.com            - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
www.neurogami.com            - Smart application development