From: andrew mcelroy <sophrinix@...>
Date: 2010-04-11T00:41:16+09:00
Subject: Re: The Ruid Concept, with question

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:15 AM, thunk <gmkoller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Charles,
>
> 100% of the code is on the table to be available to a trusted party.
>
> no fees (maybe expenses) IF the right party!  but with ND.
>
BOLLOCKS! I gave you a non disclosure signed. We even talked about it
on the phone.
I won't do a in person meet up just for a code drop because that's INSANE!
I gave you a signed ND so don't pull that line on us.

The only thing we have here is a textbook case for how badly broken
health care is in the USA.
This list is for ruby programming.  Your a smart guy so I don't get
why this is so hard to understand.

I am very rarely this annoyed, but the truth had to be told. I
apologize if my language offended anyone.

Andrew McElroy


>
> there are real reasons why this should be so.   The author sees a
> legitimate
> reason for some central control or chaos would reign.
>
> another reason is that the author is not interested in working at a
> "Ruid Central GitHub"
>
> and there are more reasons!
>
>
>
>