[#13161] hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:09:53AM +0900, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:15:52AM +0900, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13182] Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello all.
On 11/3/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Nov 3, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky wrote:
where to start ... to fix the YAML code bugs
Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi wrote:
[#13196] Subscribe to list w/o email — Trans <transfire@...>
I'm now using the ruby-core-google interface to this list, rather then
[#13198] Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...>
Hi folks,
On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Gregory Brown wrote:
James Edward Gray II wrote:
On 11/4/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#13206] guessutf 1.0.0 released — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Dear Ruby designers, developers, and testers!
[#13215] Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
I for one feel left out of conversations on ruby-dev. Barring my
[#13221] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Brent Roman schrieb:
On 11/5/07, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wrote:
Gregory Brown schrieb:
[#13238] performance problem in 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Checked latest 1.9 out of svn last week to run this test.
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13248] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Is it possible that it has a relationship with my remark about identifying
[#13254] send can't call protected methods, but invoke_method can — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
[#13259] Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
Witness:
Hi,
[#13288] Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>
So it seems from my trivial analysis that there are instances when
On 11/8/07, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:13:34PM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#13289] Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Jordi <mumismo@...>
Hello, this email is long but I hope you to read it. I think it is worth it.
Jordi wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 7:03 PM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wrot=
[#13292] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>
The rubyforge -> ml link seems to be down so here is the link :
Also reproducible with
2007/11/9, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:
[#13305] The document of random algorithm? — sishen <yedingding@...>
Hi, guys. I want to know the detailed algorithm of random number.
[#13315] primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>
I've got a couple of questions about the handling of primary encoding.
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
In article <E1IqOZI-0001t7-LT@x31>,
Hi,
[#13347] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I have revised my http compression (gzip, deflate) patch such that
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:28:01AM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#13351] Keyword Arguments — Trans <transfire@...>
Peter Vanbroekhoven mentioned this to me and I have to agree. I'd
[#13362] RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
There are a few tests breaking due to rbconfig.rb not matching what ./
On Nov 10, 2007 4:53 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On Nov 10, 2007, at 01:21 , Jordi wrote:
Eric,
On Nov 10, 2007, at 15:44 , David Flanagan wrote:
Eric Hodel wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007, at 22:34 , David Flanagan wrote:
[#13363] IO.read, IO#read (and similar methods) - Length Parameter Usage for Non One-Byte Encodings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Good morning dear Ruby folks!
[#13368] method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 11/11/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
Austin Ziegler wrote:
David Flanagan wrote:
Hi --
Quoting dblack@rubypal.com, on Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:45:42AM +0900:
Hi -
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:40:22PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
Summing it up:
Hi --
On Nov 12, 2007 8:42 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
On 12/11/2007, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:50:18PM +0900, Trans wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 7:01 PM, Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net> wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 5:01 AM, Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net> wrote:
[#13377] Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — "Lyle Johnson" <fxrubyguy@...>
Apologies in advance if this is a FAQ, but I'm trying to build the
[#13448] Time#== bug? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
[#13457] mingw rename — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>
Currently for different windows' builds, the names for RUBY_PLATFORM
On Nov 12, 2007 10:13 PM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13470] trunk's parse.c fails to compile — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>
Hi,
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13485] Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Good morning all together!
A nicer version may be...
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Trans wrote:
Hugh Sasse wrote:
There is one big difference between the actual proposals and my original
[#13498] state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...>
Are Threads mapped to threads on the underlying operating system in
On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:18 , Bill Kelly wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 7:33 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
Jordi wrote:
[#13513] Proc#hash returns different values for same body — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Hi!
[#13528] test/unit and miniunit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
When is the 1.9 freeze?
On Nov 14, 2007, at 18:43 , Trans wrote:
[#13536] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Summary:
Hi,
On Nov 15, 2007 12:44 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13542] Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...>
c:\>ri Iconv#iconv
Hi,
Am 15 Nov 2007 um 21:58 hat Nobuyoshi Nakada geschrieben:
Hi,
Am 16 Nov 2007 um 17:07 hat Nobuyoshi Nakada geschrieben:
[#13564] Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Good evening all together!
Matz has added Object.tap to Ruby 1.9 which is intended for use in
On Nov 15, 2007 8:14 PM, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wro=
Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
Hi --
Hi --
On Nov 16, 2007 3:19 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Hi --
On Nov 16, 2007 12:40 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 3:40 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
On Nov 16, 2007 12:40 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Rick DeNatale wrote:
murphy schrieb:
Hi --
On 11/16/07, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#13600] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session::PStore partitioned directories — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
In article <473D827F.10909@gmail.com>,
[#13614] Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...>
Hi!
Eust痃uio Rangel wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 2:02 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 2:25 PM, Eust=E1quio Rangel <eustaquiorangel@gmail.com> wro=
[#13618] segfault in ostruct with 1.8.6, where to get help? — "andrew taylor" <aktxyz@...>
Hello folks, not sure if this is the right place...
run it in gdb, see if it gives you a better backtrace (?)
[#13676] Failing to compile trunk under Ubuntu — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
I tried compiling trunk yesterday and today, on two different Ubuntu 6.06
[#13685] Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Hi!
At 22:01 07/11/18, Wolfgang N〓dasi-Donner wrote:
Martin Duerst schrieb:
[#13688] base64.c vs. base64.rb — Trans <transfire@...>
Hi--
[#13704] Build failure trying to use rb_define_alias on rb_mKernel — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
[#13709] Change in system() behaviour — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
In 1.8, system("badcmd") returned false.
[#13741] retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
In 1.8, I could write:
On Nov 23, 2007 12:06 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Chiming in again on this...
In article <10A28D45-97EE-47EB-B98A-1B197F30C0E9@fallingsnow.net>,
In article <6168A472-3688-4D85-AAE1-49A2F376B908@fallingsnow.net>,
[#13781] C-Core-Questions — <saladin.mundi@...>
Hi guys, sorry that I'm posting into the core mailinglist, but in the =
[#13787] Syntax error when using comment between two lines in new method chain syntax — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>
Hi!
[#13792] Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
It hangs for me here. I have to kill -9 to stop it.
[#13805] Socket.gethostbyname and Reverse Lookups: A Strange and Terrible Saga — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...>
(with apologies to Hunter Thompson ;)
Re: wondering about #tap
David A. Black schrieb:
> With the leading dot thing, it's an exception
> (or a new rule), not a style choice by the programmer. It *will* be a
> style choice, if it stays in the language; but making it possible in
> the language involves a change to the line-parsing rules themselves.
That's clear. It means that Ruby added the rule "if a
line starts with an infix operator ('.', ',' are in
fact infix operators) it will be the continuation of
the last line" to the existing "a statemant ends with
the end of a line, except a continuation is explicitly
required by an infix operator" rule.
If there are no technical problems (irb?), it doesn't
make the parsing process to complicated, it is wanted by
several user (I assume), and Matz agrees - where is the
general problem? - Nobody is enforced to use it, if (s)he
doesn't want to use it.
When I have to work with a Ruby source written by a third
person, it adds only a minor additional syntactical rule
I have to care about. Ruby still allows a lot of different
styles - I have sometimes some minor problems with programs
that always don't use parenthesis for method arguments,
because this is not my style, others may have problems
reading my dot-chains - but that's Ruby.
My original mother tongue was Algol60 where spacing and lines
didn't play any rule at all. Fortran-IV came close to this,
because spaces had no syntactical meaning, PL/I had no
keywords ("if if=then then then; else else;" was correct PL/I).
This did lead to several styles, but the programs were
understandable too. I don't see there severe problems to
understand Ruby programs where the new rules will be used.
I don't know if I will ever use the new possibilities when
writing Ruby programs, but I don't see problems to understand
programs written by other persons, which use these constructs -
if I may have problems, than these problems will not be based
on the syntax variant used in the program.
At the end of this mail I can only state, if several persons
want the additional syntax variant, if Matz agrees, if there
are no severe technical problems - why not include it into Ruby?
Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner