From: Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Date: 2007-11-24T13:17:05+09:00
Subject: Re: retry semantics changed


On Nov 23, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:

>
> OK, I didn't understand the performance issues driving the decision.
>
> The benefit of this change is that retry is now closer in user to  
> redo, next, etc...

But.. having said that...

Do we really need retry in blocks at all? Is it ever used in practice?



Dave