From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-11-11T20:22:20+09:00
Subject: Re: method names in 1.9



On Nov 11, 5:18 am, Matthew Boeh <mb...@desperance.net> wrote:
> 3. Finally, I have to admit to surprise for why the asterisk isn't considered
> a unary operator and treated as such. That is:
>
>   class Confusing
>     def to_a
>       [1,2,3]
>     end
>
>     def *@
>     # that is, analogous to -@, +@
>       to_a.reverse
>     end
>   end

(*splatting forehead*) Why didn't I think of that? That makes a lot
more sense.

T.