From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2007-11-24T16:41:21+09:00
Subject: Re: retry semantics changed

Hi,

In message "Re: retry semantics changed"
    on Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:14:15 +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> writes:

|> I find retry-outside-rescue to be extremely dangerous. See the example I 
|> gave before:
|> 
|> (call_that_must_only_be_once).foo(another_similar_call)
|
|Sorry, this needs a block for retry to work (which is pretty goofy in 
|itself):
|
|(call_that_must_only_be_once).foo(another_similar_call) {}

But how about retry being inside of the block?

							matz.