ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#13161] hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...>

Hi all,

16 messages 2007/11/01
[#13166] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/11/01

Interesting. I also did an implementation of a fixed heap size (with a
[#13163] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/11/01

On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
[#13164] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...> 2007/11/01

[#13177] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/02

Hi,
[#13180] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...> 2007/11/03

[#13181] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/03

Hi,
[#13190] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...> 2007/11/04

>
[#13218] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/05

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 04:09:53AM +0900, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
[#13222] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...> 2007/11/05

[#13223] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/05

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:15:52AM +0900, Lloyd Hilaiel wrote:
[#13230] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/06

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13240] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/06

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:32:34AM +0900, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#13241] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/06

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13242] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/06

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:04:32AM +0900, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#13252] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/07

Paul Brannan wrote:

[#13167] New Book: _The Ruby Programming Language_ — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi everyone,

1 message 2007/11/01

[#13170] Possible flaw in CGI::Session — "Bas van Klinkenberg" <bas.van.klinkenberg@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/11/02

[#13182] Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello all.

14 messages 2007/11/03
[#13183] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — "Alexey Verkhovsky" <alexey.verkhovsky@...> 2007/11/03

On 11/3/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13184] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/03

On Nov 3, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky wrote:
[#13185] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — "Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi" <ujwalic@...> 2007/11/03

where to start ... to fix the YAML code bugs
[#13186] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/11/03

Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi wrote:
[#13187] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/11/03

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#13188] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/11/03

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#13189] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/04

Maybe it would be better to move YAML out, so that it will give
[#13191] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — "Ujwal Reddy Malipeddi" <ujwalic@...> 2007/11/04

I'am reviewing the code ... YAML 1.1 spec
[#13194] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/11/04

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#13197] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2007/11/04

On Nov 4, 2007 11:47 AM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13192] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/04

On 11/3/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13211] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — _why <why@...> 2007/11/05

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 05:29:42AM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#13269] Re: Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/07

[#13196] Subscribe to list w/o email — Trans <transfire@...>

I'm now using the ruby-core-google interface to this list, rather then

5 messages 2007/11/04
[#13434] Re: Subscribe to list w/o email — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 4, 2007 6:00 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13435] Re: Subscribe to list w/o email — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 12, 2007 10:51 AM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#13199] Re: Subscribe to list w/o email — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/04

On 11/4/07, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13200] Re: Subscribe to list w/o email — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/04

On Nov 4, 2007 1:06 PM, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#13198] Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...>

Hi folks,

9 messages 2007/11/04
[#13201] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/04

On Nov 4, 2007, at 09:22 , Gregory Brown wrote:
[#13880] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/12/04

> -----Original Message-----
[#13202] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/04

On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:22 AM, Gregory Brown wrote:
[#13204] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/04

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#13205] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2007/11/04

On 11/4/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#13209] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/05

Gregory Brown wrote:
[#13210] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/05

[#13212] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/05

Trans wrote:

[#13206] guessutf 1.0.0 released — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Dear Ruby designers, developers, and testers!

6 messages 2007/11/04
[#13207] Re: guessutf 1.0.0 released — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/04

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner schrieb:
[#13239] Re: guessutf 1.0.0 released — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/06

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner schrieb:
[#13263] Re: guessutf 1.0.0 released — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/07

On Nov 6, 2007 5:20 PM, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wrot=
[#13266] Re: guessutf 1.0.0 released — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/07

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
[#13318] Re: guessutf 1.0.0 released — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/09

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:

[#13213] Kernel#p — Trans <transfire@...>

Quick query about Ruby 1.9. Does Kernel#p return it's arguments or no?

3 messages 2007/11/05
[#13214] Re: Kernel#p — Arlen Christian Mart Cuss <celtic@...> 2007/11/05

[#13216] Re: Kernel#p — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/05

[#13215] Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

I for one feel left out of conversations on ruby-dev. Barring my

6 messages 2007/11/05
[#13217] Re: Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2007/11/05

On 06/11/07 at 01:17 +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13219] Re: Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/05

Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
[#13220] Re: Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/05

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13232] Re: Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/06

At 02:58 07/11/06, murphy wrote:
[#13274] Re: Auto-translating gateway between ruby-core and ruby-dev? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/11/07

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> writes:

[#13221] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — Brent Roman <brent@...>

7 messages 2007/11/05
[#13224] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2007/11/05

On 11/5/07, Brent Roman <brent@mbari.org> wrote:
[#13225] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/05

Brent Roman schrieb:
[#13227] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2007/11/05

On 11/5/07, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wrote:
[#13228] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/05

Gregory Brown schrieb:
[#13229] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/05

T24gMTEvNS8wNywgV29sZmdhbmcgTsOhZGFzaS1Eb25uZXIgPGVkLm9kYW5vd0B3b25hZG8uZGU+
[#13881] Re: Ruby's Standard Library could use a lead maintainer — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/12/05

T24gMDYvMTEvMjAwNywgTHVpcyBMYXZlbmEgPGx1aXNsYXZlbmFAZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToK

[#13237] The future of VM::InstructionSequence — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/11/06

[#13238] performance problem in 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

Checked latest 1.9 out of svn last week to run this test.

8 messages 2007/11/06
[#13243] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/06

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13246] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/06

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:22:19AM +0900, murphy wrote:
[#13249] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/06

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13250] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/06

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:26:56AM +0900, murphy wrote:
[#13257] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/07

At 04:22 07/11/07, murphy wrote:
[#13272] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/07

Martin Duerst wrote:
[#13261] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/07

Martin Duerst schrieb:

[#13244] : Parse floating point literals that start with a dot — Brent Roman <brent@...>

2 messages 2007/11/06
[#13271] Re: [PATCH]: Parse floating point literals that start with a dot — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/07

=20

[#13245] invoke_method calling private methods when invoked on integers — David Flanagan <david@...>

The rdoc comment for invoke_method includes this example:

2 messages 2007/11/06
[#13255] Re: invoke_method calling private methods when invoked on integers — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/07

Hi,

[#13248] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Is it possible that it has a relationship with my remark about identifying

5 messages 2007/11/06
[#13256] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/07

At 06:38 07/11/07, Wolfgang N〓dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13260] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/07

Martin Duerst schrieb:
[#13287] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/08

Yes. Ruby is open source, so you can check for yourself.
[#13291] Re: performance problem in 1.9 — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/08

Martin Duerst schrieb:

[#13254] send can't call protected methods, but invoke_method can — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2007/11/07
[#13258] Re: send can't call protected methods, but invoke_method can — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/07

Hi,
[#13277] Re: send can't call protected methods, but invoke_method can — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/07

Nobu,
[#13278] Re: send can't call protected methods, but invoke_method can — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/08

Hi,

[#13259] Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Witness:

10 messages 2007/11/07
[#13302] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — brabuhr@... 2007/11/08

On Nov 7, 2007 2:05 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13319] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,
[#13320] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,
[#13325] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13332] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/09

David Flanagan wrote:
[#13342] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/09

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13380] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/11

David Flanagan wrote:
[#13333] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2007/11/09

[#13338] Re: Frightening retry behavior should be deprecated and removed — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/09

On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:20 AM, Evan Phoenix wrote:

[#13262] Patch for uClibc stdio - status? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

Is there any chance of getting this patch either committed or explicitly

1 message 2007/11/07

[#13265] invoke_method, and things you "just have to know" — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2007/11/07
[#13267] Re: invoke_method, and things you "just have to know" — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/07

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:23:09PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#13268] Re: invoke_method, and things you "just have to know" — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/07

Hi --

[#13270] Should "Iconv" work with the actual Ruby 1.9 snapshots? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good Evening!

2 messages 2007/11/07
[#13279] Re: Should "Iconv" work with the actual Ruby 1.9 snapshots? — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/08

I have been using iconv with up-to-date builds of 1.9 on a regular

[#13273] Patch to 1.8.6 resolv.rb — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>

At RubyConf I got motivated to help out on documentation. I dove

3 messages 2007/11/07
[#13802] Re: Patch to 1.8.6 resolv.rb — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2007/11/28

[#13821] Re: Patch to 1.8.6 resolv.rb — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/29

Hi,

[#13283] Problem with installing latest version — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>

I just tried to compile and install the latest SVG revision, 13837.

4 messages 2007/11/08
[#13284] Re: Problem with installing latest version — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/08

Martin,
[#13285] Re: Problem with installing latest version — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/08

I've just checked in a fix. Please svn update and try again.
[#13286] Re: Problem with installing latest version — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/08

At 15:16 07/11/08, you wrote:

[#13288] Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

So it seems from my trivial analysis that there are instances when

8 messages 2007/11/08
[#13293] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/08

On 11/8/07, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13296] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/08

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:13:34PM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#13298] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/08

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#13309] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/08

> >> First, it's pretty inefficient in that it imposes an overhead on every
[#13337] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/09

If Ruby were to switch to a smarter GC style, at large landmarks might
[#13341] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/09

Roger Pack wrote:
[#13346] Re: Unrecovered memory leak thoughts. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/09

> The bigger issue is that extension writers would have to rewrite their

[#13289] Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Jordi <mumismo@...>

Hello, this email is long but I hope you to read it. I think it is worth it.

8 messages 2007/11/08
[#13290] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Gonzalo Garramuño <ggarra@...> 2007/11/08

Jordi wrote:
[#13294] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/08

On Nov 8, 2007 7:03 PM, Gonzalo Garramu=F1o <ggarra@advancedsl.com.ar> wrot=
[#13295] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/08

T24gMTEvOC8wNywgSm9yZGkgPG11bWlzbW9AZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKPiA9PSBUaGUgc2Vh
[#13300] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/08

T24gTm92IDgsIDIwMDcgMTA6NDUgUE0sIEF1c3RpbiBaaWVnbGVyIDxoYWxvc3RhdHVlQGdtYWls
[#13297] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/08

Your proposal is similar to Rake tasks, and pre and post wrappers.
[#13311] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/08

[#13299] Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/08

On Nov 9, 2007 12:07 AM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#13292] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

The rubyforge -> ml link seems to be down so here is the link :

9 messages 2007/11/08
[#13317] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/08

Also reproducible with
[#13330] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/09

[#13334] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/11/09

2007/11/9, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:
[#13335] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/09

try it without RUBYOPT= anything?
[#13336] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/09

It appears that when you have
[#13339] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — Satoshi Nakagawa <snakagawa@...> 2007/11/09

You can see it on:
[#13340] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/11/09

2007/11/9, Satoshi Nakagawa <snakagawa@infoteria.co.jp>:
[#13323] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-15425 ] Leak with regexp in method with no local vars. — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2007/11/09

On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 19:31 +0900, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:

[#13301] The significance of aliases vs synonyms — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

1 message 2007/11/08

[#13304] unsubscribe — Mark McConnell <mmcconnell@...>

unsubscribe

1 message 2007/11/08

[#13305] The document of random algorithm? — sishen <yedingding@...>

Hi, guys. I want to know the detailed algorithm of random number.

6 messages 2007/11/08
[#13313] Re: The document of random algorithm? — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2007/11/08

sishen wrote:
[#13314] Re: The document of random algorithm? — "daz (c)" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2007/11/08

daz (c) wrote:
[#13316] Re: The document of random algorithm? — sishen <yedingding@...> 2007/11/08

Great. That's it. Thanks very much.
[#13307] Re: The document of random algorithm? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/11/08

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, sishen wrote:
[#13308] Re: The document of random algorithm? — sishen <yedingding@...> 2007/11/08

On Nov 9, 2007 2:25 AM, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:

[#13306] Re: JRuby/Ruby top-level classes? (Fwd: Metaclasses) — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Giles Bowkett wrote:

3 messages 2007/11/08
[#13312] Re: JRuby/Ruby top-level classes? (Fwd: Metaclasses) — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/11/08

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Giles Bowkett wrote:
[#13322] Re: JRuby/Ruby top-level classes? (Fwd: Metaclasses) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/09

Giles Bowkett wrote:

[#13315] primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>

I've got a couple of questions about the handling of primary encoding.

29 messages 2007/11/08
[#13324] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,
[#13326] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/09

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#13329] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,
[#13327] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/09

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#13328] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,
[#13343] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13355] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,
[#13357] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13456] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/13

In a related matter, I see that the encoding method of string literals
[#13381] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/11/11

On 10/11/2007, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13331] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,
[#13344] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13356] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,
[#13358] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13360] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

David Flanagan wrote:
[#13359] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,
[#13361] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#13373] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,
[#13374] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/10

Nobuyoshi Nakada schrieb:
[#13375] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/10

In article <E1IqOZI-0001t7-LT@x31>,
[#13428] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/12

Hi,
[#13433] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 12, 2007 5:59 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13445] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/12

In article <dbfc82860711120147n51085e8dm57039b6edf400e28@mail.gmail.com>,
[#13446] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/12

Tanaka Akira schrieb:
[#13429] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/12

In article <20071112045907.D13F4E049C@mail.bc9.jp>,
[#13431] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/12

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#13443] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/12

In article <4737F257.5030505@davidflanagan.com>,
[#13581] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/16

In article <87hcjsxd8l.fsf@fsij.org>,

[#13345] Re: hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

>For things like priority queues I'd love to see heap data structures

1 message 2007/11/09

[#13347] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

I have revised my http compression (gzip, deflate) patch such that

6 messages 2007/11/09
[#13967] Re: [PATCH] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2007/12/10

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 05:28:01AM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#13974] Re: [PATCH] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/12/10

[#13975] Re: [PATCH] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/12/10

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#13986] Re: [PATCH] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/12/10

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#14004] Re: [PATCH] http compression, zlib agnostic, for 1.9 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2007/12/11

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:29:32AM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:

[#13348] Re: Should "Iconv" work with the actual Ruby 1.9 snapshots? — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

Yeah did you install the mingw port of iconv? It can be a little

2 messages 2007/11/09
[#13350] Re: Should "Iconv" work with the actual Ruby 1.9 snapshots? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/09

Roger Pack schrieb:

[#13351] Keyword Arguments — Trans <transfire@...>

Peter Vanbroekhoven mentioned this to me and I have to agree. I'd

6 messages 2007/11/09
[#13352] Re: Keyword Arguments — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

Given that Matz has been planning on a Christmas release for a year, and
[#13367] Re: Keyword Arguments — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/10

OK. If this works in 1.9, then I think it's good enough.
[#13684] Re: Keyword Arguments — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/18

[#13353] Re: Keyword Arguments — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/11/10

On 11/9/07, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13460] Re: Keyword Arguments — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/11/13

Quoting binary42@gmail.com, on Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:16:47AM +0900:

[#13362] RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

There are a few tests breaking due to rbconfig.rb not matching what ./

11 messages 2007/11/10
[#13366] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/10

On Nov 10, 2007 4:53 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#13376] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/10

On Nov 10, 2007, at 01:21 , Jordi wrote:
[#13379] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

Eric,
[#13427] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/12

On Nov 10, 2007, at 15:44 , David Flanagan wrote:
[#13432] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/12

Eric Hodel wrote:
[#13439] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/12

On Nov 11, 2007, at 22:34 , David Flanagan wrote:
[#13521] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — "Tim Morgan" <tmorgan99@...> 2007/11/14

Perhaps this is more specific to rubygems itself, but is there a reason why
[#13522] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:36 , Tim Morgan wrote:
[#13524] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Dudley Flanders <dudley@...> 2007/11/14

[#13430] Re: RubyGems imported into 1.9 trunk — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/12

On Nov 9, 2007, at 23:53 , Eric Hodel wrote:

[#13363] IO.read, IO#read (and similar methods) - Length Parameter Usage for Non One-Byte Encodings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good morning dear Ruby folks!

3 messages 2007/11/10
[#13364] Re: IO.read, IO#read (and similar methods) - Length Parameter Usage for Non One-Byte Encodings — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/10

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13365] Re: IO.read, IO#read (and similar methods) - Length Parameter Usage for Non One-Byte Encodings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/10

David Flanagan schrieb:

[#13368] method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

61 messages 2007/11/10
[#13369] Re: method names in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,
[#13370] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/10

Hi --
[#13371] Re: method names in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,
[#13383] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 2:33 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13384] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/11

To this day I don't know what splat means (meaning--it's not too intuitive).
[#13387] Re: method names in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/11

Roger Pack wrote:
[#13408] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 10:04 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13388] Re: method names in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13403] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/11

On 11/11/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13410] Re: method names in 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/11

Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#13413] Re: method names in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/11

David Flanagan wrote:
[#13415] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/11

Hi --
[#13458] Re: method names in 1.9 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/11/13

Quoting dblack@rubypal.com, on Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:45:42AM +0900:
[#13469] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/13

Hi -
[#13472] Re: method names in 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/13

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:40:22PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#13474] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/13

Hi --
[#13480] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/11/13

IMHO the private/public "problem" comes from Java people who sees
[#13483] Re: method names in 1.9 — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/11/13

Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
[#13494] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007 7:38 AM, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#13548] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/15

May I summary and translate this thread to japanese and send it to ruby-dev?
[#13551] Re: method names in 1.9 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/15

[#13422] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/12

On 11/11/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13424] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 12, 2007 10:34 AM, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13438] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/12

Hi --
[#13423] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/12

Summing it up:
[#13437] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/12

Hi --
[#13440] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 12, 2007 8:42 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13441] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/12

Hi --
[#13442] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 12, 2007 10:31 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13447] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/12

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:15:54PM +0900, Jordi wrote:
[#13444] Re: method names in 1.9 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/12

[#13467] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/13

Hi --
[#13473] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/11/13

Hello
[#13465] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/11/13

On 12/11/2007, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13466] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/13

On Nov 13, 2007 7:28 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote:
[#13468] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/13

Hi --
[#13471] Re: method names in 1.9 — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/13

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:37:53PM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#13477] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/13

On 11/13/07, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13426] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/12

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:00:55AM +0900, Jordi wrote:
[#13389] Re: method names in 1.9 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/11

[#13390] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 6:09 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13393] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/11

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 06:09:21PM +0900, Trans wrote:
[#13399] Re: method names in 1.9 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/11

[#13386] Re: method names in 1.9 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/11

[#13398] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/11

Hi --
[#13391] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/11

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:50:18PM +0900, Trans wrote:
[#13392] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 7:01 PM, Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net> wrote:
[#13394] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/11

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 07:06:44PM +0900, Jordi wrote:
[#13404] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 5:29 AM, Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net> wrote:
[#13406] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 12:48 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13414] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/11

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:48:07AM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#13417] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 4:33 PM, Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net> wrote:
[#13396] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/11

Hi --
[#13405] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 5:01 AM, Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net> wrote:
[#13407] Re: method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/11

Hi --
[#13416] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 1:28 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13418] Re: method names in 1.9 — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/11

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#13419] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 11, 2007 6:37 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#13420] Re: method names in 1.9 — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/12

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#13421] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/12

On Nov 11, 2007 7:33 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:

[#13377] Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — "Lyle Johnson" <fxrubyguy@...>

Apologies in advance if this is a FAQ, but I'm trying to build the

6 messages 2007/11/10
[#13385] Re: Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/11

I have very much the same problems on Cygwin, with revision 13875.
[#13409] Re: Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/11

[#13411] Re: Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2007/11/11

On Nov 11, 2007 8:41 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#13412] Re: Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/11/11

> I just built trunk from clean yesterday on leopard and it seems to
[#13425] Re: Link errors for trunk on Mac OS X — "Lyle Johnson" <fxrubyguy@...> 2007/11/12

On 11/11/07, Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@gmail.com> wrote:

[#13378] mkmf.rb and create_makefile - important for rubygems — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/11/10

[#13382] Have you contributed doucmentation to Ruby's std-lib? — James Britt <james.britt@...>

I'm trying to get the names of people who have been contributing rdoc

1 message 2007/11/11

[#13395] What does "Encoding.compatible?" do? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2007/11/11
[#13397] Re: What does "Encoding.compatible?" do? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/11

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:

[#13448] Time#== bug? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2007/11/12
[#13449] Re: Time#== bug? — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2007/11/12

[#13450] Re: Time#== bug? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/12

=20
[#13452] Re: Time#== bug? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/12

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#13454] Re: Time#== bug? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/12

=20

[#13451] patches, and imminent freeze? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Given talk of the imminent freeze of 1.9 could someone help me grease

1 message 2007/11/12

[#13453] Limit Ruby 1.8.6 process size — Brent Roman <brent@...>

Over the past few weeks I've seen quite a few posts to this list about

1 message 2007/11/12

[#13455] Help tracking down nasty SegFault bug during GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>

[Please excuse the possible duplicate posting...]

3 messages 2007/11/12
[#13461] Re: Help tracking down nasty SegFault bug during GC — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/13

Brent Roman wrote:
[#13462] Re: Help tracking down nasty SegFault bug during GC — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2007/11/13

Brent Roman wrote:

[#13457] mingw rename — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

Currently for different windows' builds, the names for RUBY_PLATFORM

13 messages 2007/11/13
[#13459] Re: mingw rename — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/13

On Nov 12, 2007 10:13 PM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13475] Re: mingw rename — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/13

> I think the wide too many differences between *nix and Windows turn
[#13476] Re: mingw rename — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/13

On Nov 13, 2007 4:24 PM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13481] Re: mingw rename — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/13

On Nov 12, 2007, at 20:43 , Luis Lavena wrote:
[#13489] Re: mingw rename — Gonzalo Garramu <ggarra@...> 2007/11/14

Eric Hodel wrote:
[#13512] Re: mingw rename — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/14

> For what is worth, I've always advocated creating a simplified OS module
[#13490] Re: mingw rename — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...> 2007/11/14

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:23:07 +0900, Gonzalo Garramu wrote:
[#13503] Re: mingw rename — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/14

T24gTm92IDE0LCAyMDA3IDM6NTcgQU0sIEpheSBMZXZpdHQgPGxpc3RzLXJ1YnlAc2hvcHdhdGNo
[#13499] Re: mingw rename — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/14

On 11/14/07, Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@shopwatch.org> wrote:
[#13504] Re: mingw rename — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007 10:08 AM, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13509] Re: mingw rename — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...> 2007/11/14

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:08:38 +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#13510] Re: mingw rename — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007 11:32 AM, Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@shopwatch.org> wrote:

[#13463] Help tracking down nasty SegFault bug during GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>

Ed,

1 message 2007/11/13

[#13464] Help tracking down nasty SegFault bug during GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>

Gonzalo,

1 message 2007/11/13

[#13470] trunk's parse.c fails to compile — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2007/11/13
[#13478] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/13

Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
[#13479] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2007/11/13

On Nov 13, 2007 10:05 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13523] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/14

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13537] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/11/15

> but we can't expect all people to install bison 2.3 first, can we?
[#13538] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/15

Vincent Isambart wrote:
[#13695] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — "yang hawk" <mytxyang215@...> 2007/11/19

Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
[#13696] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/19

Hi,
[#13525] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/14

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13531] Re: trunk's parse.c fails to compile — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/15

Hi,

[#13482] To the devs : Why do new threads copy the stack ? — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

Recently, I got a really slow stack overflow because I had a thread

3 messages 2007/11/13
[#13502] Re: To the devs : Why do new threads copy the stack ? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/11/14

Do you see this same behavior in 1.9?
[#13484] Re: To the devs : Why do new threads copy the stack ? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/11/13

Jonas Pfenniger wrote:

[#13485] Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good morning all together!

23 messages 2007/11/14
[#13486] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/14

A nicer version may be...
[#13488] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/14

[#13495] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/14

[#13501] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Patrick Mahoney <pat@...> 2007/11/14

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:23:04PM +0900, Trans wrote:
[#13496] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/11/14

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Trans wrote:
[#13527] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/14

Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#13530] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/15

There is one big difference between the actual proposals and my original
[#13532] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/15

[#13540] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/15

Trans schrieb:
[#13544] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 11:32 AM, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wr=
[#13546] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/15

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
[#13539] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/15

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13553] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/15

[#13597] Array#split_at — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/16

Trans wrote:
[#13608] Re: Array#split_at — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,
[#13620] Re: Array#split_at — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#13497] R辿f. : Re: Proposal: Array#walker — tad.bochan@... 2007/11/14

Whats wrong with
[#13487] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2007/11/14

[#13492] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/14

Hi --
[#13500] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/14

David A. Black schrieb:
[#13508] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/14

[#13511] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/14

[#13491] autoconf (in 1.8 at least) and feature defs vs. macros — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...>

I'm fiddling around trying to get Ruby 1.8.6-p110 to build on a Stratus VOS

2 messages 2007/11/14
[#13493] Re: autoconf (in 1.8 at least) and feature defs vs. macros — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2007/11/14

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Jay Levitt wrote:

[#13498] state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...>

Are Threads mapped to threads on the underlying operating system in

30 messages 2007/11/14
[#13505] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/14

Jordi wrote:
[#13507] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007 11:01 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#13506] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007 10:02 AM, Jordi <mumismo@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13516] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/14

Jordi wrote:
[#13518] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/14

> -----Original Message-----
[#13519] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2007/11/14

[#13520] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007 4:18 PM, Bill Kelly <billk@cts.com> wrote:
[#13549] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/11/15

On 14/11/2007, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13526] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:18 , Bill Kelly wrote:
[#13545] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/11/15

>> No multi-core support... ever?
[#13563] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/11/15

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:38:05 +0900, Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@m4x.org> wrote:
[#13574] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — hemant <gethemant@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 9:58 PM, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
[#13547] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 7:33 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#13582] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/16

Jordi wrote:
[#13593] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/16

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13651] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/11/16

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:37:08 +0900, murphy <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:
[#13643] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/16

murphy wrote:
[#13554] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/15

Jordi wrote:
[#13555] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 11:51 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#13556] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/15

Jordi wrote:
[#13576] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007, at 06:04 , Jordi wrote:
[#13557] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/15

> > I had presumed native threads were a step in that direction. (No?)
[#13562] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/11/15

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:19:25 +0900, Jordi <mumismo@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13579] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2007/11/16

[#13580] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,
[#13583] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2007/11/16

[#13584] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,
[#13590] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2007/11/16

[#13592] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,

[#13513] Proc#hash returns different values for same body — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

6 messages 2007/11/14
[#13514] Re: Proc#hash returns different values for same body — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/14

The hash method works consistently with ==, but both have misleading
[#13517] Re: Proc#hash returns different values for same body — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/14

David Flanagan schrieb:
[#13515] Re: Proc#hash returns different values for same body — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/14

I made another comparison with Ruby 1.8...
[#13534] Re: Proc#hash returns different values for same body — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/15

Hi,
[#13568] Re: Proc#hash returns different values for same body — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 14, 2007 9:45 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#13528] test/unit and miniunit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

When is the 1.9 freeze?

17 messages 2007/11/14
[#13533] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/15

[#13535] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Jeff <cohen.jeff@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 14, 8:43 pm, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13541] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/15

On Nov 14, 2007, at 18:43 , Trans wrote:
[#13550] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/15

[#13573] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007, at 06:27 , Trans wrote:
[#13615] Re: test/unit and miniunit — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/16

> -----Original Message-----
[#13585] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/16

[#13587] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13603] Re: test/unit and miniunit — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Trans wrote:
[#13604] Re: test/unit and miniunit — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/16

On 11/16/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#13606] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13609] Re: test/unit and miniunit — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 9:58 AM, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#13602] Re: test/unit and miniunit — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
[#13529] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/15

[#13586] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/16

In article <9A602F51-BA0F-4662-BF42-5D33663DE166@zenspider.com>,
[#13588] Re: test/unit and miniunit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/16

[#13536] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>

Summary:

6 messages 2007/11/15
[#13552] Re: [PATCH] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/15

=20
[#13558] Re: [PATCH] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/15

Hi,
[#13559] Re: [PATCH] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 12:44 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#13560] Re: [PATCH] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/15

Hi,
[#13561] Re: [PATCH] mswin32-vc6 segmentation fault due ruby_in_eval wrong definition — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 1:02 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#13542] Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...>

c:\>ri Iconv#iconv

8 messages 2007/11/15
[#13543] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/15

Hi,
[#13589] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...> 2007/11/16

Am 15 Nov 2007 um 21:58 hat Nobuyoshi Nakada geschrieben:
[#13591] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,
[#13594] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...> 2007/11/16

Am 16 Nov 2007 um 17:07 hat Nobuyoshi Nakada geschrieben:
[#13610] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,
[#13697] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...> 2007/11/19

Am 16 Nov 2007 um 23:07 hat Nobuyoshi Nakada geschrieben:
[#13723] Re: Iconv#iconv returning wrong object (ri broken?) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/11/20

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:29:29PM +0900, Dirk Traulsen wrote:

[#13564] Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good evening all together!

53 messages 2007/11/15
[#13565] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/15

Matz has added Object.tap to Ruby 1.9 which is intended for use in
[#13567] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/15

David Flanagan wrote:
[#13569] Ruby 1.9 code name? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/15

murphy wrote:
[#13571] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/15

David Flanagan schrieb:
[#13575] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 8:14 PM, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wro=
[#13577] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/15

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
[#13595] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 15, 2007 11:38 PM, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wr=
[#13596] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/16

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
[#13578] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2007/11/16

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:
[#13598] wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13605] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13612] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13621] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13623] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 3:19 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13628] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13702] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/19

On Nov 16, 2007 6:12 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13626] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13639] Re: wondering about #tap — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/16

I'm somehow surprised about this long discussion, based on my short question,
[#13641] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13700] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/19

On Nov 16, 2007 6:03 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13624] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 12:40 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13625] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/16

[#13699] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/19

On Nov 16, 2007 5:52 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#13627] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13701] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/19

On Nov 16, 2007 6:05 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13631] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#13703] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/19

On Nov 16, 2007 6:20 PM, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#13630] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 3:40 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13633] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
[#13655] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 9:25 AM, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#13632] Re: wondering about #tap — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/16

David A. Black wrote:
[#13634] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13636] Re: wondering about #tap — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 12:40 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#13637] Re: wondering about #tap — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/16

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#13638] Re: wondering about #tap — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 1:45 PM, murphy <murphy@rubychan.de> wrote:
[#13640] Re: wondering about #tap — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/16

murphy schrieb:
[#13644] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13645] Re: wondering about #tap — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13659] Re: wondering about #tap — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/17

On 11/16/07, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13660] Re: wondering about #tap — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/17

[#13661] Re: wondering about #tap — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/17

On Nov 16, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#13662] Re: wondering about #tap — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/17

On 11/16/07, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#13666] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/17

Hi --
[#13667] Re: wondering about #tap — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/17

David A. Black schrieb:
[#13668] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/17

Hi --
[#13669] Re: wondering about #tap — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/17

David A. Black schrieb:
[#13670] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/17

On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Wolfgang N=C3=A1dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13647] Re: wondering about #tap — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/16

David A. Black schrieb:
[#13649] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --
[#13656] Re: wondering about #tap — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/11/17

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13642] Re: wondering about #tap — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...> 2007/11/16

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:16:08 +0900, Martin DeMello wrote:
[#13677] Re: wondering about #tap — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...> 2007/11/17

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:27:14 +0900, Alex Young wrote:

[#13566] Ignoring generated files — murphy <murphy@...>

hello!

1 message 2007/11/15

[#13570] Embedding Ruby 1.9 in multithreaded app — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/11/15
[#13572] Re: Embedding Ruby 1.9 in multithreaded app — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2007/11/15

Michael Neumann schrieb:

[#13600] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session::PStore partitioned directories — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

In article <473D827F.10909@gmail.com>,

4 messages 2007/11/16
[#13601] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session::PStore partitioned directories — Maurice Aubrey <maurice.aubrey@...> 2007/11/16

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#13663] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session::PStore partitioned directories — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/17

On Nov 16, 2007, at 04:22 , Maurice Aubrey wrote:
[#13731] Re: [PATCH] CGI::Session::PStore partitioned directories — Maurice Aubrey <maurice.aubrey@...> 2007/11/20

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#13607] railroad problem — <srinivasan.anand@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2007/11/16
[#13611] Re: railroad problem — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2007/11/16

T24gTm92IDE2LCAyMDA3IDEwOjQyIEFNLCAgPHNyaW5pdmFzYW4uYW5hbmRAYWNjZW50dXJlLmNv

[#13613] Enumerable#zip vs. Enumerable#everything_else — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Just wondering:

2 messages 2007/11/16
[#13616] Re: Enumerable#zip vs. Enumerable#everything_else — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,

[#13614] Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...>

Hi!

12 messages 2007/11/16
[#13650] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/16

Hi,
[#13654] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — Eust痃uio 'TaQ' Rangel <eustaquiorangel@...> 2007/11/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#13657] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...> 2007/11/17

Hi Sasada!
[#13658] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...> 2007/11/17

Sorry my messages are going twice - maybe some weird stuff on the
[#13671] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/17

Eust痃uio Rangel wrote:
[#13672] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...> 2007/11/17

On Nov 17, 2007 2:02 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#13674] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...> 2007/11/17

On Nov 17, 2007 2:25 PM, Eust=E1quio Rangel <eustaquiorangel@gmail.com> wro=
[#13678] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/17

Hi,
[#13683] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/18

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#13692] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/18

Hi,
[#13734] Re: Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...> 2007/11/20

Hi Koichi!

[#13617] Some Core Questions — <saladin.mundi@...>

Hi guys, first time using the mailing list, hope im not doing anything =

2 messages 2007/11/16
[#13629] Re: Some Core Questions — "Lyle Johnson" <fxrubyguy@...> 2007/11/16

On 11/16/07, saladin.mundi@gmx.de <saladin.mundi@gmx.de> wrote:

[#13618] segfault in ostruct with 1.8.6, where to get help? — "andrew taylor" <aktxyz@...>

Hello folks, not sure if this is the right place...

4 messages 2007/11/16
[#13646] Re: segfault in ostruct with 1.8.6, where to get help? — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/11/16

run it in gdb, see if it gives you a better backtrace (?)
[#13648] Re: segfault in ostruct with 1.8.6, where to get help? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/16

> -----Original Message-----
[#13653] Re: segfault in ostruct with 1.8.6, where to get help? — "andrew taylor" <aktxyz@...> 2007/11/16

Yeah, I ran some solo tests like that also. I finally replaced

[#13619] Change in signal handling — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've noticed differences in the handling of SIGCLD in 1.9. For

1 message 2007/11/16

[#13622] Suggestion for native thread tests — Eustaquio 'TaQ' Rangel <eustaquiorangel@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2007/11/16

[#13635] Keyword arguments "spec" — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...>

It seems that there are two aspects to adding keyword arguments in Ruby.

2 messages 2007/11/16
[#13673] Re: Keyword arguments "spec" — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/17

Hi,

[#13652] pty seems to be broken — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

1 message 2007/11/16

[#13664] Observe variable set and variable change — <saladin.mundi@...>

Hey folks,

2 messages 2007/11/17
[#13665] Re: Observe variable set and variable change — Arlen Christian Mart Cuss <celtic@...> 2007/11/17

Hi,

[#13675] Class Code? — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good evening!

1 message 2007/11/17

[#13676] Failing to compile trunk under Ubuntu — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

I tried compiling trunk yesterday and today, on two different Ubuntu 6.06

5 messages 2007/11/17
[#13679] Re: Failing to compile trunk under Ubuntu — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/17

Brian Candler wrote:
[#13680] Re: Failing to compile trunk under Ubuntu — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2007/11/17

> What version of GCC do you have? What revision number of trunk is this?
[#13682] Re: Failing to compile trunk under Ubuntu — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2007/11/17

Brian Candler wrote:
[#13681] Re: Failing to compile trunk under Ubuntu — david@... 2007/11/17

I had this same error message until I upgraded bison from 2.0 to something

[#13685] Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

11 messages 2007/11/18
[#13686] Re: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2007/11/18

And each_char shouldn't throw an index error...no?
[#13687] Re: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/18

Kornelius Kalnbach schrieb:
[#13694] Re: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/19

At 22:36 07/11/18, Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
[#13693] Re: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/19

At 22:01 07/11/18, Wolfgang N〓dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13698] Re: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/19

Martin Duerst schrieb:
[#13717] Re: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/19

Martin Duerst schrieb:
[#13718] Still exists: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/19

Wolfgang Nテ。dasi-Donner schrieb:
[#13721] Re: Still exists: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/20

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13724] Re: Still exists: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/20

David Flanagan schrieb:
[#13729] Re: Still exists: Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/11/20

At 09:32 07/11/20, David Flanagan wrote:

[#13688] base64.c vs. base64.rb — Trans <transfire@...>

Hi--

8 messages 2007/11/18
[#13689] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/11/18

Trans wrote:
[#13691] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/18

[#13720] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/11/20

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 06:55:24AM +0900, Trans wrote:
[#13726] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/20

Sam Roberts schrieb:
[#13728] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/20

murphy wrote:
[#13690] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/18

[#13719] Re: base64.c vs. base64.rb — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/11/20

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 06:49:54AM +0900, Trans wrote:

[#13704] Build failure trying to use rb_define_alias on rb_mKernel — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2007/11/19
[#13705] Re: Build failure trying to use rb_define_alias on rb_mKernel — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/19

Hi,
[#13706] Re: Build failure trying to use rb_define_alias on rb_mKernel — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/19

> -----Original Message-----
[#13707] Re: Build failure trying to use rb_define_alias on rb_mKernel — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/19

Hi,

[#13708] Minimal embedded Ruby 1.9 application — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/11/19

[#13709] Change in system() behaviour — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

In 1.8, system("badcmd") returned false.

13 messages 2007/11/19
[#13710] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/19

[#13711] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/19

Ryan Davis schrieb:
[#13712] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/19

[#13713] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/19

Dave Thomas schrieb:
[#13714] Re: Change in system() behaviour — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/11/19

On Nov 19, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#13715] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/19

Dave Thomas schrieb:
[#13716] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/19

[#13732] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/20

Hi,
[#13733] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/20

On Nov 19, 2007, at 23:29 , Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13736] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/20

[#13985] Re: Change in system() behaviour — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2007/12/10

[#13890] Re: Change in system() behaviour — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2007/12/06

Hi,

[#13722] Encoding Confusion... — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

4 messages 2007/11/20
[#13725] Re: Encoding Confusion... — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/20

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13727] Re: Encoding Confusion... — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/20

David Flanagan schrieb:
[#13730] Re: Encoding Confusion... — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/20

Hi,

[#13735] YAML buffer overrun — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

core dump as follows.

2 messages 2007/11/20
[#13794] Re: YAML buffer overrun — _why <why@...> 2007/11/27

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:17:52PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#13737] What is nil_plus? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/11/20
[#13738] Re: What is nil_plus? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/20

Hi,

[#13739] 1.8.6: gc.c and __builtin_frame_pointer — Jay Levitt <lists-ruby@...>

I'm playing with porting Ruby to Stratus VOS, which is an unusual but

2 messages 2007/11/23
[#13740] Re: 1.8.6: gc.c and __builtin_frame_pointer — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/23

Hi,

[#13741] retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

In 1.8, I could write:

46 messages 2007/11/23
[#13742] Re: retry semantics changed — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/11/23

On Nov 23, 2007 12:06 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#13743] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/23

[#13744] Re: retry semantics changed — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/11/23

On Nov 23, 2007 12:28 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#13745] Re: retry semantics changed — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/11/23

On Nov 23, 2007 1:18 PM, Brian Mitchell <binary42@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13746] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/23

Hi,
[#13747] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/23

[#13748] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/23

Hi,
[#13759] Re: retry semantics changed — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/24

In article <E1IvhOv-0004xi-2B@x31>,
[#13749] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/23

[#13758] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/24

[#13762] Re: retry semantics changed — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2007/11/24

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#13765] Re: retry semantics changed — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/24

Michael Neumann schrieb:
[#13769] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13771] Re: retry semantics changed — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/11/24

T24gTm92IDI0LCAyMDA3IDg6MTMgQU0sIENoYXJsZXMgT2xpdmVyIE51dHRlciA8Y2hhcmxlcy5u
[#13773] Re: retry semantics changed — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/24

Brian Mitchell schrieb:
[#13779] Re: retry semantics changed — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/24

I want to inform you about two interesting reactions
[#13761] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/24

Hi,
[#13751] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#13753] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13760] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/24

Hi,
[#13768] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13770] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/24

Hi,
[#13772] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/24

[#13774] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/24

Hi,
[#13775] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/24

[#13776] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/24

Hi,
[#13777] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#13778] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#13789] Re: retry semantics changed — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/26

Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
[#13754] Re: retry semantics changed — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/24

Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
[#13755] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#13763] Re: retry semantics changed — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2007/11/24

Chiming in again on this...
[#13766] Re: retry semantics changed — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/24

In article <10A28D45-97EE-47EB-B98A-1B197F30C0E9@fallingsnow.net>,
[#13798] Re: retry semantics changed — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2007/11/27

[#13799] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/28

Hi,
[#13810] Re: retry semantics changed — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2007/11/28

[#13804] Re: retry semantics changed — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2007/11/28

In article <6168A472-3688-4D85-AAE1-49A2F376B908@fallingsnow.net>,
[#13808] Re: retry semantics changed — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2007/11/28

[#13811] Re: retry semantics changed — Jérémy Zurcher <jeremy@...> 2007/11/28

On Thursday 29 November 2007 05:46, Evan Phoenix wrote :
[#13812] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/28

J辿r辿my Zurcher wrote:
[#13813] Re: retry semantics changed — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/11/28

> -----Original Message-----
[#13800] Re: retry semantics changed — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/28

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#13801] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/28

[#13809] Re: retry semantics changed — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2007/11/28

[#13795] Re: retry semantics changed — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2007/11/27

[#13750] Weightless Threads? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Also known as "microthreads".

4 messages 2007/11/24
[#13752] Re: Weightless Threads? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/24

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#13756] Re: Weightless Threads? — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/11/24

On Nov 23, 2007 8:02 PM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13757] Re: Weightless Threads? — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/11/24

On Nov 23, 2007 8:02 PM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#13764] Access modifier : private — "Dharmarth Shah" <dharmarth@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2007/11/24
[#13767] Re: Access modifier : private — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/24

Dharmarth Shah wrote:

[#13780] threads+sockets probs — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

Question: With 1.8.6, it seems that (especially in win32, and in

3 messages 2007/11/24
[#14968] Re: threads+sockets probs — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/01/10

On Nov 24, 2007 4:26 PM, Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#15017] Re: threads+sockets probs — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/01/11

On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 08:04:39AM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:

[#13781] C-Core-Questions — <saladin.mundi@...>

Hi guys, sorry that I'm posting into the core mailinglist, but in the =

6 messages 2007/11/26
[#13783] Re: C-Core-Questions — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/26

saladin.mundi@gmx.de schrieb:
[#13784] Re: C-Core-Questions — <saladin.mundi@...> 2007/11/26

Yes, I know that some information about C is written in the PickAxe.
[#13785] Re: C-Core-Questions — ts <decoux@...> 2007/11/26

>>>>> "s" == <saladin.mundi@gmx.de> writes:
[#13786] Re: C-Core-Questions — <saladin.mundi@...> 2007/11/26

I think I have explained it too confusing
[#13791] Re: C-Core-Questions — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/27

[#13782] gem_prelude.rb raises exception — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/11/26
[#13793] Re: gem_prelude.rb raises exception — Richard Kilmer <rich@...> 2007/11/27

[#13826] Re: gem_prelude.rb raises exception — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2007/11/29

> I indeed added that check to skip unless dash and also wrapped the

[#13787] Syntax error when using comment between two lines in new method chain syntax — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

3 messages 2007/11/26
[#13788] Re: Syntax error when using comment between two lines in new method chain syntax — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/26

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner schrieb:
[#13790] Re: Syntax error when using comment between two lines in new method chain syntax — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/26

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:

[#13792] Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

It hangs for me here. I have to kill -9 to stop it.

8 messages 2007/11/27
[#13828] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/29

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#13831] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/30

murphy wrote:
[#13832] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/30

[#13836] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/30

On Nov 29, 2007 9:34 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#13837] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/30

[#13829] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/30

[#13830] Re: Anyone tried -r debug on OSX? — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2007/11/30

On Nov 27, 2007 2:27 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#13796] autoload reminder — Trans <transfire@...>

Just want to remind core team that #autoload does not use the normal

3 messages 2007/11/27
[#13797] Re: autoload reminder — "Felix Geller" <fgeller@...> 2007/11/27

On 11/27/07, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#13827] Re: autoload reminder — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/29

[#13803] Hash#eql? and Hash#== in trunk — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>

In Ruby 1.8, Hash#== uses #== to compare values:

2 messages 2007/11/28
[#13823] Re: Hash#eql? and Hash#== in trunk — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/29

Hi,

[#13805] Socket.gethostbyname and Reverse Lookups: A Strange and Terrible Saga — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...>

(with apologies to Hunter Thompson ;)

4 messages 2007/11/28
[#13806] Re: Socket.gethostbyname and Reverse Lookups: A Strange and Terrible Saga — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2007/11/28

[#13807] Re: Socket.gethostbyname and Reverse Lookups: A Strange and Terrible Saga — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2007/11/28

[#14193] Re: Socket.gethostbyname and Reverse Lookups: A Strange and Terrible Saga — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2007/12/21

> Note, I'm not altogether surprised it worked for you on OS X,

[#13814] -v affects parse tree, causes tests to fail in ParseTree — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

The problem is that the void_expr macro is used in void_stmts and

5 messages 2007/11/28
[#13822] Re: -v affects parse tree, causes tests to fail in ParseTree — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/29

Hi,
[#13815] Re: -v affects parse tree, causes tests to fail in ParseTree — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/28

[#13816] Re: -v affects parse tree, causes tests to fail in ParseTree — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/28

Ryan Davis wrote:
[#13817] Re: -v affects parse tree, causes tests to fail in ParseTree — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/29

[#13818] Dear Matz, — Steven Lumos <steven@...>

3 messages 2007/11/29
[#13819] Re: Dear Matz, — andrew taylor <aktxyz@...> 2007/11/29
[#13820] Re: Dear Matz, — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/29

Steven Lumos wrote:

[#13824] Inhering from Proc in 1.9? — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/11/29
[#13825] Re: Inhering from Proc in 1.9? — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/11/29

Hi,

[#13833] Bug in Signal Handling — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

I'm pretty sure we have found a bug in Ruby while working on TextMate.

3 messages 2007/11/30
[#13841] Re: Bug in Signal Handling — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/12/01

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#13929] Re: Bug in Signal Handling — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/12/07

On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:47 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#13834] warn() vs. puts() — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Why isn't warn() as smart as puts()?

2 messages 2007/11/30
[#13838] Re: warn() vs. puts() — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2007/11/30

[#13835] "initialize" method in 1.9 Thread gone? — "B. Tommy Jensen" <btoj@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2007/11/30
[#13839] Re: "initialize" method in 1.9 Thread gone? — "Florian Frank" <flori@...> 2007/11/30

B. Tommy Jensen wrote:
[#13840] Re: "initialize" method in 1.9 Thread gone? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/11/30

Hi,

Re: Proposal of a new operator for Method and Proc

From: "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
Date: 2007-11-08 13:45:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #13295 
T24gMTEvOC8wNywgSm9yZGkgPG11bWlzbW9AZ21haWwuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKPiA9PSBUaGUgc2Vh
cmNoIGZvciBldmVudHMgPT0KPgo+IEZpcnN0LCB0aGUgY2xhc3NlcyBiZWxvdyBhcmUgbm90IHRl
c3RlZCBhbmQgSSdtIGp1c3QgYSBiZWdpbm5lciwgc29tZQo+IGVycm9ycyBhcmUgdG9vayBmb3Ig
Z3JhbnRlZC4gV29uJ3QgYWZmZWN0IG15IGRpc2NvdXJzZS4gSSB3YW50ZWQgdG8KPiBpbXBsZW1l
bnQgYSB0aW1lciwgbG9va2luZyBpbiBnb29nbGUgdGhlIGZpcnN0IHRoaW5nIHlvdSBnZXQgaXMK
PiBzb21ldGhpbmcgbGlrZSB0aGlzOgo+Cj4gY2xhc3MgVGltZXIKPgo+ICBkZWYgc3RhcnQgKHRp
bWVvdXQpCj4gICAgdGggPSBUaHJlYWQubmV3IGRvCj4gICAgICBsb29wIGRvCj4gICAgICAgICMg
d29yayBkb25lIGJ5IHRoZSB0aW1lcgo+ICAgICAgICBzbGVlcCh0aW1lb3V0KQo+ICAgICAgZW5k
Cj4gICAgZW5kCj4gIGVuZAo+IGVuZAo+Cj4gTGV0J3Mgc3VwcG9zZSBJJ20gb25seSB1c2luZyB0
aGUgdGltZXIgdG8gaW1wbGVtZW50IHNvbWUga2luZCBvZiBjb3VudGVyLgo+IENvb2wsIEJVVCBJ
IHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdGhhdCB0aGUgd29yayBvZiB0aGUgdGltZXIgYmUgb25seSB0aW1lCj4gcmVs
YXRlZCEgYW5kIHRoZSBjb3VudGVyIGJlIGluIGl0cyByZWxldmFudCBjbGFzcy4KPiBBbHNvIEkg
bWF5IHdhbnQgdG8gcmV1c2UgdGhpcyBjbGFzcy4KPgo+Cj4gU28gSSB0aG91Z2h0IGFib3V0IHNv
bWV0aGluZyBsaWtlIHRoaXMKPgo+IGNsYXNzIFRpbWVyCj4KPiAgZGVmIGluaXRpYWxpemUgKCph
cmd1bWVudHMpCj4gICAgY29ubmVjdGlvbnM9W10KPiAgICBAYXJndW1lbnRzPWFyZ3VtZW50cwo+
ICBlbmQKPiAgZGVmIHJlZ2lzdGVyX3dvcmsgKCBwb2ludGVyKQo+ICAgIGNvbm5lY3Rpb25zICs9
IHBvaW50ZXIKPiAgZW5kCj4gIGRlZiBkZXJlZ2lzdGVyX3dvcmsgKHBvaW50ZXIpCj4gICAgY29u
bmVjdGlvbnMgLT0gcG9pbnRlcgo+ICBlbmQKPiAgZGVmIGRlcmVnaXN0ZXJfYWxsCj4gICAgY29u
bmVjdGlvbnMgPVtdCj4gIGVuZAo+ICBkZWYgbGlzdAo+ICAgIGNvbm5lY3Rpb25zLmVhY2ggeyB8
bHwgcHV0cyAiI3tsfSIgfQo+ICBlbmQKPgo+ICBkZWYgc3RhcnQgKHRpbWVvdXQpCj4gICAgdGgg
PSBUaHJlYWQubmV3IGRvCj4gICAgICBsb29wIGRvCj4gICAgICAgICMgd29yayBkb25lIGJ5IHRo
ZSB0aW1lcgo+ICAgICAgICBjb25uZWN0aW9ucy5lYWNoIHsgfGx8IGwuY2FsbCgqQGFyZ3VtZW50
cykgfQo+ICAgICAgICBzbGVlcCAodGltZW91dCkKPiAgICAgIGVuZAo+ICAgIGVuZAo+ICBlbmQK
Pgo+IGVuZAo+Cj4gSSB3cm90ZSBwb2ludGVyLCBJIG1lYW50IGZvciBpbnN0YW5jZSBDb3VudGVy
LmNvdW50KCkKPgo+IFRoaXMgY2xhc3MgaXMgbXVjaCBtb3JlIGdlbmVyYWwgYW5kIHBvd2VyZnVs
Lgo+IFRoZSB3b3JrIGlzIGRvbmUgaW4gdGhlIHJlbGV2YW50IGNsYXNzZXMgYW5kIG5vdCBpbnNp
ZGUgdGhlIHRpbWVyCj4gQWxzbywgd2UgY2FuIHJlZ2lzdGVyIGFzIG1hbnkgY29ubmVjdGVkIGNs
YXNzZXMgYXMgd2Ugd2FudC4KPgo+Cj4gU2VlaW5nIHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyBHb29kICh0bSkgSSB0
aG91Z2h0IGFib3V0IGhvdyBjYW4gSSBtYWtlIGFueSBjbGFzcyB1c2UgdGhpcy4KPiBPZiBjb3Vy
c2UgSSBjYW4gbWFrZSBhIGNsYXNzIHdpdGggdGhlIHJlZ2lzdGVyLCBkZXJlZ2lzdGVyIGFuZCBj
YWxsCj4gdGhpbmcgYW5kIG1peGluIGl0Lgo+Cj4gQnV0IFdvdWxkbid0IGJlIGNvdWxkIHRoYXQg
dGhlc2UgZW5jYXBzdWxhdGVkIGNvbm5lY3Rpb25zIGFyZQo+IHN1cHBvcnRlZCBuYXRpdmVseSBi
eSBydWJ5Pwo+Cj4gQWJvdXQgYmVuZWZpdHMgb2YgdGhpcyBzY2hlbWU6Cj4gaHR0cDovL2RvYy50
cm9sbHRlY2guY29tLzQuMy9zaWduYWxzYW5kc2xvdHMuaHRtbAo+Cj4gQWJvdXQgYSBjb21wYXJp
c29uIG9mIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyAoZ29pbmcgc3RyYWlnaHQgdG8gdGhlCj4gY29tcGFyaXNv
biB0YWJsZSBpcyBiZXR0ZXIpOgo+IGh0dHA6Ly9zY290dGNvbGxpbnMubmV0L2FydGljbGVzL2Et
ZGVlcGVyLWxvb2stYXQtc2lnbmFscy1hbmQtc2xvdHMuaHRtbAo+Cj4KPiA9PVRoZSBjb29sIHN0
dWZmID09Cj4KPiBJIHRob3VnaHQgYWJvdXQgaG93IHRvIGdldCB0aGlzIGZlYXR1cmUgaW1wbGVt
ZW50ZWQgd2l0aG91dCBwb2xsdXRpbmcKPiB0aGUgbW9zdCBiYXNpYyBjbGFzcyBvZiBSdWJ5Lgo+
IEkgdGhpbmsgdGhhdCB0aGUgbW9zdCBwb3dlcmZ1bCBhbmQgbGVzcyBwb2xsdXRpbmcgd2F5IGlz
IGFkZGluZyBhIG5ldwo+IG9wZXJhdG9yIHRvIE1ldGhvZCBhbmQgUHJvYy4KPgo+Cj4gRXhhbXBs
ZS4KPiBJIGhhdmUgYSBjbGFzcyBQYWdlLCBhIGNsYXNzIFRpbWVyIGFuZCBhIGNsYXNzIENvdW50
ZXIuICBUaGUgUGFnZQo+IGluc3RhbmNlIGlzIHRoZSBwYXJlbnQgb2YgYm90aCBpbnN0YW5jZXMg
b2YgVGltZXIgYW5kIENvdW50ZXIuCj4KPiBjbGFzcyBQYWdlCj4KPiAgZGVmIGluaXRpYWxpemUK
PiAgICBjb3VudGVyID0gQ291bnRlci5uZXcKPiAgICB0PVRpbWVyLm5ldwo+Cj4gICAgdC50aW1l
b3V0IC0+IGNvdW50ZXIudXBkYXRlCj4gICAgY291bnRlci5vdmVycnVuIC0+IHNob3dfZXJyb3IK
Pgo+ICBlbmQKPgo+IGVuZAo+Cj4gU29tZSBub3RlczoKPiBXZSBjb25uZWN0IHRoZSB0aW1lb3V0
IG9mIHRoZSB0aW1lciB3aXRoIHRoZSB1cGRhdGUgb2YgdGhlIGNvdW50ZXIuCj4gV2UgY29ubmVj
dCB0aGUgb3ZlcnJ1biBvZiB0aGUgY291bnRlciB3aXRoIGFuIGVycm9yIHNob3cgYnkgdGhlIHBh
Z2UuCj4gVGhlIFRpbWVyIHdoZW5ldmVyIGl0IHRpbWVvdXRzLCBpdCBqdXN0IC4uLiBjYWxsIHRv
IGl0cyAudGltZW91dCgpIG1ldGhvZC4KPgo+IE5vdGUgdGhhdCB0aGUgVGltZXIgY2xhc3MgZG9l
cyBub3QgbmVlZCB0byBiZSBtb2RpZmllZCB0byBtYWtlCj4gc29tZXRoaW5nIG5ldyAodXBkYXRl
IHRoZSBjb3VudGVyKSAuIEl0IGlzIGEgcmVhbCBpc29sYXRlZCBzb2Z0d2FyZQo+IGNvbXBvbmVu
dC4KPiBUaGUgc2FtZSBnb2VzIHRvIHRoZSBjb3VudGVyLCBpdCBvdmVycnVucyBhbmQgbGV0IHRo
ZSB3b3JsZCBrbm93IGFib3V0Cj4gaXQuIFRoYXQgaXMgaXRzIGpvYi4gRG9uJ3QgbmVlZCB0byBr
bm93IGFib3V0IHRoZSBQYWdlIGhhdmluZyBhbmQKPiBlcnJvci4KPgo+IEkgIHByb3Bvc2VkICIt
PiIgaW4gbXkgaWdub3JhbmNlLiBJdCBtYXkgYXBwZWFyIGFzIGEgcmVkaXJlY3QgcmF0aGVyCj4g
dGhhbiAic29tZXRoaW5nIHlvdSBhZGQiLiBTdXJlbHkgc29tZXRoaW5nIGVsc2UgaXMgYmV0dGVy
Lgo+Cj4KPgo+IFdpdGggdGhpcyBzY2hlbWUsIHdlIGhhdmUgYSBnZW5lcmFsIGFuZCBlYXN5ICwg
Y29vbCwgZXZlbiBydWJ5aXNoIHdheQo+IHRvIGNvbm5lY3QgdG8gZXZlbnRzIGFuZCB0byBjb25u
ZWN0IGNvZGUgYXJiaXRyYXJpbHkgdG8gYW55IGNsYXNzCj4gbWV0aG9kIQo+IEZvciBpbnN0YW5j
ZSwgd2UgbmVlZCB0byBtYWtlIHNvbWUgY2xlYW4gdXAgZWFjaCB0aW1lIHdlIGNhbGwgdG8KPiBG
aWxlLmNsb3NlKCkgKHdoYXRldmVyIHJlYXNvbikKPiBQcmV2aW91cyBzaW1wbGUgd2F5Cj4KPiBk
ZWYgY2xvc2UgKGZpbGUpCj4gIGZpbGUuY2xvc2UKPiAgQGZpbGVzT3BlbmVkIC09IDEKPiBlbmQK
Pgo+IG5ldyB3YXkgKGluIHRoZSBjb25zdHJ1c3Rvcik6Cj4KPiBmaWxlLmNsb3NlIC0+IHsgIEBm
aWxlc09wZW5lZCAtPSAxIH0KPgo+IHsgIEBmaWxlc09wZW5lZCAtPSAxIH0gd2lsbCBiZWNvbWUg
YSBQcm9jIGNhbGxlZCB3aGVuIGZpbGUuY2xvc2UKPiBmaW5pc2guIFNlZSB0aGF0IHRoZSBpbXBs
ZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBpbiBDIHNob3VsZCBiZSBlZmZpY2llbnQgKGEgbGlzdAo+IG9mIHBvaW50ZXJz
IHRvIGZ1bmN0aW9ucykKPgo+IE5vdyBzdXBwb3NlIHRoYXQgeW91IGxvYWQgYSBuZXcgcGx1Z2lu
IHRoYXQgYWxzbyBuZWVkIHRvIGRvIHNvbWUKPiBjbGVhbnVwIHdoZW4gdGhlIGZpbGUgb3BlbiBi
eSB0aGUgbWFpbiBjbGFzcyBpcyBjbG9zZWQuIFdoZW4gbG9hZGVkIGl0Cj4gd2lsbCBhZGQgaXRz
ZWxmIHdoYXRldmVyIGl0IG5lZWRzIGZvciBpdHNlbGYuCj4KPgo+IGkgZmVlbCBteSBleGFtcGxl
cyBhcmUgbm90IHZlcnkgZ29vZC4uLiBzb3JyeS4KPgo+Cj4gPT0gU3VtbWFyeSA9PQo+Cj4gVGhp
cyBhZGRpdGlvbiB0byB0aGUgbGFuZ3VhZ2UgaXNvbGF0ZXMgc29mdHdhcmUgY29tcG9uZW50cyBh
bmQgY3JlYXRlcwo+IGEgbmV3IHZlcnkgcG93ZXJmdWwgY29uc3RydWN0aW9uIGF0IGEgdmVyeSBs
b3cgY29zdC4KPgo+Cj4KPgo+IC0tCj4gSm9yZGkgUG9sb+OAgCjjgrjjg6fjg6vjg4fjgqTjgIDj
g53jg63vvIkKPiDlpYjoia/lhYjnq6/np5HlrabmioDooZPlpKflrabpmaLlpKflraYg5oOF5aCx
56eR5a2m56CU56m256eRCj4g6Ieq54S26KiA6Kqe5Yem55CG5a2m6Kyb5bqnIEQxCj4KPgoKCi0t
IApBdXN0aW4gWmllZ2xlciAqIGhhbG9zdGF0dWVAZ21haWwuY29tICogaHR0cDovL3d3dy5oYWxv
c3RhdHVlLmNhLwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAqIGF1c3RpbkBoYWxvc3RhdHVlLmNhICogaHR0cDov
L3d3dy5oYWxvc3RhdHVlLmNhL2ZlZWQvCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICogYXVzdGluQHppZWdsZXJz
LmNhCgoKCk9uIDExLzgvMDcsIEpvcmRpIDxtdW1pc21vQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6Cj4gT24g
Tm92IDgsIDIwMDcgNzowMyBQTSwgR29uemFsbyBHYXJyYW11w7FvIDxnZ2FycmFAYWR2YW5jZWRz
bC5jb20uYXI+IHdyb3RlOgo+ID4gSm9yZGkgd3JvdGU6Cj4gPiA+Cj4gPiA+IGNsYXNzIFBhZ2UK
PiA+ID4KPiA+ID4gIGRlZiBpbml0aWFsaXplCj4gPiA+ICAgIGNvdW50ZXIgPSBDb3VudGVyLm5l
dwo+ID4gPiAgICB0PVRpbWVyLm5ldwo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPiAgICB0LnRpbWVvdXQgLT4gY291bnRl
ci51cGRhdGUKPiA+ID4gICAgY291bnRlci5vdmVycnVuIC0+IHNob3dfZXJyb3IKPiA+ID4KPiA+
ID4gIGVuZAo+ID4gPgo+ID4gPiBlbmQKPiA+ID4KPiA+Cj4gPiBZb3UgcHJvYmFibHkgd2FudCB0
byBsZWFybiBtb3JlIGFib3V0IHJ1YnkgYmxvY2tzLCBwcm9jcyBhbmQgdmFyaWFibGUKPiA+IHNj
b3Blcy4gIEhlcmUncyBhIHdheSB0byBkbyB3aGF0IHlvdSB3YW50IGluIGEgcnVieSB3YXkuCj4g
Pgo+ID4gY2xhc3MgVGltZXIKPiA+ICAgICBkZWYgY2FsbGJhY2socHJvYyA9IG5pbCwgJmJsb2Nr
KQo+ID4gICAgICAgICBAcHJvYyA9IHByb2MgfHwgYmxvY2sKPiA+ICAgICBlbmQKPiA+Cj4gPiAj
IHByb3RlY3RlZCAgIyBidXQgd2UgbWFrZSBpdCBwdWJsaWMgZm9yIHRoaXMgdGVzdAo+ID4gICAg
IGRlZiB0aW1lb3V0Cj4gPiAgICAgICAgIEBwcm9jLmNhbGwgaWYgQHByb2MKPiA+ICAgICBlbmQK
PiA+IGVuZAo+ID4KPiA+IGNsYXNzIFBhZ2UKPiA+ICAgIGRlZiBzaG93X2Vycm9yCj4gPiAgICBl
bmQKPiA+Cj4gPiAgICBkZWYgaW5pdGlhbGl6ZQo+ID4gICAgICBAY291bnRlciA9IDAKPiA+ICAg
ICAgdCA9IFRpbWVyLm5ldwo+ID4KPiA+ICAgICAgdC5jYWxsYmFjayAgICAgICAgeyBAY291bnRl
ciArPSAxICB9Cj4gPiAgICAgIHQudGltZW91dAo+ID4KPiA+ICAgICAgIyBvci4uLgo+ID4gICAg
ICB0LmNhbGxiYWNrKCBtZXRob2QoOnNob3dfZXJyb3IpICkKPiA+ICAgICAgdC50aW1lb3V0Cj4g
PiAgICBlbmQKPiA+IGVuZAo+ID4KPiA+IFlvdSBhbHNvIHByb2JhYmx5IHdhbnQgdG8gZGlzY3Vz
cyB0aGlzIHNvcnQgb2Ygc3R1ZmYgaW4gcnVieS10YWxrIHVudGlsCj4gPiB5b3UgYXJlIG1vcmUg
ZmFtaWxpYXIgd2l0aCBydWJ5Lgo+ID4KPgo+Cj4gQXMgSSBzYWlkIEknbSBub3QgZmFtaWxpYXIg
d2l0aCB0aGUgc3ludGF4aXMgKG15IGNsYXNzZXMgbWF5IGhhdmUKPiBlcnJvcnMpIGJ1dCBJIGFt
IGRvIGZhbWlsaWFyIHdpdGggdGhlIHNlbWFudGljcyAoSSB0aGluayBJIHByZXR0eQo+IHVuZGVy
c3RhbmQgInJ1Ynlpc20iKS4KPgo+IFlvdXIgY2xhc3MgaGF2ZSBhIG51bWJlciBvZiBwcm9ibGVt
cyBjb21wYXJpbmcgd2l0aCBteSBzb2x1dGlvbi4gSXQgaXMKPiBzaW1pbGFyIHRvIHRoZSBzZWNv
bmQgc29sdXRpb24gSSBnYXZlLgo+Cj4gLSBZb3UgbXVzdCBhZGQgdGhhdCBzcGVjaWFsIG1ldGhv
ZCBjYWxsYmFjayBldmVyeXRpbWUuICBPZiBjb3Vyc2UgeW91Cj4gY2FuIG1ha2UgYW4gc3BlY2lh
bCBjbGFzcyBmb3IgdGhhdCBhbmQgdXNlIG1peGlucyAuLi4KPiAtIFlvdSBjYW4gb25seSByZWdp
c3RlciBvbmUgInNpZ25hbCIgLiBNeSBzb2x1dGlvbiBjYW4gaGF2ZSBhbgo+IGFyYml0cmFyeSBu
dW1iZXIuCj4gLSBZb3UgYXJlIGFkZGluZyBhIG5ldyBtZXRob2QgdG8gZXZlcnkgY2xhc3MKPgo+
Cj4gSSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGV4dGVuZCBteSBwcm9wb3NhbCB0byBkaXNjb25uZWN0aW9uOgo+
Cj4gdC50aW1lb3V0IC0+IGNvdW50ZXIudXBkYXRlICB0byBjb25uZWN0Cj4gSSBjYW4ndCBpbWFn
aW5lIGEgY29vbCBvcGVyYXRvciB0byBtZWFuIGRpc2Nvbm5lY3QgKHggaXMgZ3JhcGhpY2FsbHkK
PiBwZXJmZWN0IHRob3VnaCkKPgo+Cj4gQW4gYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmUgcHJvcG9zYWwsIG1vcmUgUXQt
bGlrZSAoc2VlIHJlZmVyZW5jZSBsaW5rcyBpbiB0aGUKPiBmaXJzdCBlbWFpbCkgYW5kIG1vcmUg
dmVyYm9zZToKPgo+IE1ldGhvZCBvciBQcm9jLmNvbm5lY3QgKE1ldGhvZCBvciBQcm9jKQo+IE1l
dGhvZCBvciBQcm9jLmRpc2Nvbm5lY3QgKE1ldGhvZCBvciBQcm9jKQo+Cj4gT3IgYSBjb25uZWN0
IGFuZCBkaXNjb25uZWN0IGluIE9iamVjdCBidXQgSSB3b3VsZCByZWFsbHkgd29uJ3QgbGlrZSB0
bwo+IHBvbGx1dGUgaXQgKE9iamVjdCBoYXMgInNlbmQiIG1ldGhvZCB0aG91Z2gsIGl0IGlzIG11
Y2ggbGlrZSBoYWxmIG9mCj4gd2hhdCBJIG5lZWQgZm9yIHRoZSBjb25uZWN0aW9uKS4KPgo+CgoK
LS0gCkF1c3RpbiBaaWVnbGVyICogaGFsb3N0YXR1ZUBnbWFpbC5jb20gKiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmhh
bG9zdGF0dWUuY2EvCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICogYXVzdGluQGhhbG9zdGF0dWUuY2EgKiBodHRw
Oi8vd3d3LmhhbG9zdGF0dWUuY2EvZmVlZC8KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKiBhdXN0aW5AemllZ2xl
cnMuY2EKCgpPbiAxMS84LzA3LCBKb3JkaSA8bXVtaXNtb0BnbWFpbC5jb20+IHdyb3RlOgo+IEFz
IEkgc2FpZCBJJ20gbm90IGZhbWlsaWFyIHdpdGggdGhlIHN5bnRheGlzIChteSBjbGFzc2VzIG1h
eSBoYXZlCj4gZXJyb3JzKSBidXQgSSBhbSBkbyBmYW1pbGlhciB3aXRoIHRoZSBzZW1hbnRpY3Mg
KEkgdGhpbmsgSSBwcmV0dHkKPiB1bmRlcnN0YW5kICJydWJ5aXNtIikuCgpHaXZlbiB5b3VyIGNv
bW1lbnRzLCBJJ20gbm90IHN1cmUgdGhhdCB0aGlzIGlzIGFzIGNsZWFyIGFzIHlvdSB0aGluay4g
QXMKYW4gZXhhbXBsZSwgeW91IHVzZSAidC50aW1lb3V0IiB0byByZXByZXNlbnQgdGhlIHRpbWVv
dXQgb2YgdGhlIHRpbWVyLApidXQgdGhlcmUncyBub3RoaW5nIGRlZmluZWQgZm9yIHRoaXMuICJ0
LnRpbWVvdXQiIG1lYW5zIHNlbmRpbmcgdGhlCiN0aW1lb3V0IG1lc3NhZ2UgdG8gb2JqZWN0ICJ0
IjsgaXQgZG9lc24ndCBtZWFuIGFueXRoaW5nIHRvIGRvIHdpdGggc29tZQp0aW1lb3V0IChvciBA
dGltZW91dCkgdmFyaWFibGUuCgpXaHkgZG9lcyB0aGlzIG1hdHRlcj8gV2VsbDoKCj4gWW91ciBj
bGFzcyBoYXZlIGEgbnVtYmVyIG9mIHByb2JsZW1zIGNvbXBhcmluZyB3aXRoIG15IHNvbHV0aW9u
LiBJdCBpcwo+IHNpbWlsYXIgdG8gdGhlIHNlY29uZCBzb2x1dGlvbiBJIGdhdmUuCj4KPiAtIFlv
dSBtdXN0IGFkZCB0aGF0IHNwZWNpYWwgbWV0aG9kIGNhbGxiYWNrIGV2ZXJ5dGltZS4gT2YgY291
cnNlIHlvdQo+ICAgY2FuIG1ha2UgYW4gc3BlY2lhbCBjbGFzcyBmb3IgdGhhdCBhbmQgdXNlIG1p
eGlucyAuLi4KCllvdSBjYW4gbWFrZSBhIG1peGluIHRoYXQgaGFzIHN1Y2ggcmVnaXN0cmF0aW9u
cywgYnV0IHlvdSB0aGVuIGhhdmUgdG8KaW5kaWNhdGUgaG93IHNpZ25hbHMgd2lsbCBiZSByYWlz
ZWQuCgo+IC0gWW91IGNhbiBvbmx5IHJlZ2lzdGVyIG9uZSAic2lnbmFsIiAuIE15IHNvbHV0aW9u
IGNhbiBoYXZlIGFuCj4JYXJiaXRyYXJ5IG51bWJlci4KCkltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGRldGFpbC4g
WW91IGRvbid0IGhhdmUgdG8gaGF2ZSBhIHNpbmdsZSBjYWxsYmFjawpmdW5jdGlvbjsgeW91IGNh
biB1c2UgYSBjYWxsYmFjayBmdW5jdGlvbiBhcnJheS4KCj4gLSBZb3UgYXJlIGFkZGluZyBhIG5l
dyBtZXRob2QgdG8gZXZlcnkgY2xhc3MKCkxlc3Mgb2YgYSBwcm9ibGVtIHRoYW4geW91IHRoaW5r
LgoKWW91ciBwcm9wb3NhbCBkb2Vzbid0IGFjdHVhbGx5IHN1Z2dlc3QgaG93IHRoZXNlIHRoaW5n
cyB3b3VsZCAqd29yayogLS0KaG93IGRvIHlvdSBpbXBsZW1lbnQgdGhlIHNsb3RzIGFuZCBzaWdu
YWxzIGluIGdlbmVyYWw/IFlvdSBuZWVkIHRvIGxvb2sKYXQgdGhpcyBhIGJpdCBkZWVwZXIgYW5k
IHNlZSB0aGF0IHRoZXJlIGFyZSBhbHJlYWR5IGFuYWxhZ291cyB0aGluZ3MgLS0KbGlrZSBHb256
YWxvJ3MgZXhhbXBsZSBvZiBjYWxsYmFjayBmdW5jdGlvbnMgLS0gdGhhdCBjYW4gYmUgZG9uZSB3
aXRob3V0CmFkZGluZyB1Z2x5IHN5bnRheCB0byBSdWJ5LgoKICBjbGFzcyBUaW1lcgoJZGVmIGlu
aXRpYWxpemUodGltZW91dCkKCSAgQGNhbGxiYWNrcyA9IFtdCgkgIEB0aW1lb3V0ID0gdGltZW91
dAoJZW5kCglkZWYgcmVnaXN0ZXIoY2IpCgkgIEBjYWxsYmFja3MgPDwgY2IKCWVuZAoJZGVmIHVu
cmVnaXN0ZXIoY2IpCgkgIEBjYWxsYmFja3MuZGVsZXRlKGNiKQoJZW5kCglkZWYgY2xlYXJfY2Fs
bGJhY2tzCgkgIEBjYWxsYmFja3MuY2xlYXIKCWVuZAoJZGVmIHN0YXJ0KCphcmdzKQoJICB0aCA9
IFRocmVhZC5uZXcgZG8KCQlsb29wIGRvCgkJICBzbGVlcChAdGltZW91dCkKCQkgIEBjYWxsYmFj
a3MuZWFjaCB7IHxjYnwgY2IuY2FsbCgqYXJncykgfQoJCWVuZAoJICBlbmQKCWVuZAogIGVuZAoK
ICBjbGFzcyBDb3VudGVyCglhdHRyX3JlYWRlciA6dmFsdWUKCWRlZiBpbml0aWFsaXplKHN0YXJ0
ID0gMCwgbWF4ID0gbmlsKQoJICBAdmFsdWUgPSBzdGFydC50b19pCgkgIEBjYWxsYmFja3MgPSBb
XQoJICBAbWF4ID0gbWF4CgllbmQKCWRlZiBpbmNyZW1lbnQKCSAgQHZhbHVlICs9IDEKCSAgQGNh
bGxiYWNrcy5lYWNoIHsgfGNifCBjYi5jYWxsIH0gaWYgQHZhbHVlID4gQG1heAoJZW5kCglkZWYg
cmVnaXN0ZXIoY2IpCgkgIEBjYWxsYmFja3MgPDwgY2IKCWVuZAoJZGVmIHVucmVnaXN0ZXIoY2Ip
CgkgIEBjYWxsYmFja3MuZGVsZXRlKGNiKQoJZW5kCglkZWYgY2xlYXJfY2FsbGJhY2tzCgkgIEBj
YWxsYmFja3MuY2xlYXIKCWVuZAogIGVuZAoKICBjbGFzcyBQYWdlCglkZWYgc2hvd19lcnJvcjsg
ZW5kCglkZWYgaW5pdGlhbGl6ZQoJICBAY291bnRlciA9IENvdW50ZXIubmV3CgkgIEB0aW1lciA9
IFRpbWVyLm5ldwoKCSAgQHRpbWVyLnJlZ2lzdGVyKGxhbWJkYSB7IEBjb3VudGVyLnVwZGF0ZSB9
KQoJICBAY291bnRlci5yZWdpc3RlcihsYW1iZGEgeyB0aGlzLnNob3dfZXJyb3IgfSkKCWVuZAog
IGVuZAoKV2hlcmUgeW91IGNhbGwgYSBjYWxsYmFjayBpc24ndCBhYmxlIHRvIGJlIGdlbmVyYWxp
emVkLgoKLWF1c3RpbgotLSAKQXVzdGluIFppZWdsZXIgKiBoYWxvc3RhdHVlQGdtYWlsLmNvbSAq
IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaGFsb3N0YXR1ZS5jYS8KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKiBhdXN0aW5AaGFsb3N0
YXR1ZS5jYSAqIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaGFsb3N0YXR1ZS5jYS9mZWVkLwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAq
IGF1c3RpbkB6aWVnbGVycy5jYQo=

In This Thread

Prev Next