[#13161] hacking on the "heap" implementation in gc.c — Lloyd Hilaiel <lloyd@...>

Hi all,

16 messages 2007/11/01

[#13182] Thinking of dropping YAML from 1.8 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello all.

14 messages 2007/11/03

[#13315] primary encoding and source encoding — David Flanagan <david@...>

I've got a couple of questions about the handling of primary encoding.

29 messages 2007/11/08
[#13331] Re: primary encoding and source encoding — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/09

Hi,

[#13368] method names in 1.9 — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

61 messages 2007/11/10
[#13369] Re: method names in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/10

Hi,

[#13388] Re: method names in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#13403] Re: method names in 1.9 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/11/11

On 11/11/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:

[#13410] Re: method names in 1.9 — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/11

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#13413] Re: method names in 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/11/11

David Flanagan wrote:

[#13423] Re: method names in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...> 2007/11/12

Summing it up:

[#13386] Re: method names in 1.9 — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/11

[#13391] Re: method names in 1.9 — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2007/11/11

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:50:18PM +0900, Trans wrote:

[#13457] mingw rename — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>

Currently for different windows' builds, the names for RUBY_PLATFORM

13 messages 2007/11/13

[#13485] Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good morning all together!

23 messages 2007/11/14
[#13486] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/14

A nicer version may be...

[#13488] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/14

[#13495] Re: Proposal: Array#walker — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/14

[#13498] state of threads in 1.9 — Jordi <mumismo@...>

Are Threads mapped to threads on the underlying operating system in

30 messages 2007/11/14
[#13519] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2007/11/14

[#13526] Re: state of threads in 1.9 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/11/14

On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:18 , Bill Kelly wrote:

[#13528] test/unit and miniunit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

When is the 1.9 freeze?

17 messages 2007/11/14

[#13564] Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Good evening all together!

53 messages 2007/11/15
[#13575] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/15

On Nov 15, 2007 8:14 PM, Wolfgang N=E1dasi-Donner <ed.odanow@wonado.de> wro=

[#13578] Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc. — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2007/11/16

Nikolai Weibull schrieb:

[#13598] wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --

[#13605] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — Trans <transfire@...> 2007/11/16

[#13612] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --

[#13624] Re: wondering about #tap (was: Re: Thoughts about Array#compact!, Array#flatten!, Array#reject!, String#strip!, String#capitalize!, String#gsub!, etc.) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 12:40 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#13632] Re: wondering about #tap — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/11/16

David A. Black wrote:

[#13634] Re: wondering about #tap — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2007/11/16

Hi --

[#13636] Re: wondering about #tap — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2007/11/16

On Nov 16, 2007 12:40 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#13637] Re: wondering about #tap — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/11/16

Rick DeNatale wrote:

[#13640] Re: wondering about #tap — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2007/11/16

murphy schrieb:

[#13614] Suggestion for native thread tests — "Eust痃uio Rangel" <eustaquiorangel@...>

Hi!

12 messages 2007/11/16

[#13685] Problems with \M-x in utf-8 encoded strings — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...>

Hi!

11 messages 2007/11/18

[#13741] retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

In 1.8, I could write:

46 messages 2007/11/23
[#13742] Re: retry semantics changed — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2007/11/23

On Nov 23, 2007 12:06 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:

[#13743] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/23

[#13746] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/23

Hi,

[#13747] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/23

[#13748] Re: retry semantics changed — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/11/23

Hi,

[#13749] Re: retry semantics changed — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2007/11/23

railroad problem

From: <srinivasan.anand@...>
Date: 2007-11-16 13:42:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #13607
Hi all,

            Got struck up with this. Please help.

=20

The actual requirement is that I am trying to generate a model diagram
thru the railroad which I have installed in my machine. I use both
oracle and postgre db's in the db connection (database.yml file).=20

=20

"puredisk_development:

  adapter: postgresql

  database: ca

  port: 10085

  username: ***

  password: ***

=20

reporting_development:

  adapter: oracle

  username: ***

  password: ***

  database: ***

"

=20

The error which I am getting when I am running the command "railroad -M
-v -o models" is=20

=20

/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.4.2/lib/active_support
/dependencies.rb:249:in `load_missing_constant': Expected
config/../app/models/pd.rb to define Pd (LoadError)

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.4.2/lib/active_support
/dependencies.rb:452:in `const_missing'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.4.2/lib/active_support
/dependencies.rb:464:in `const_missing'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.4.2/lib/active_support
/inflector.rb:250:in `constantize'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.4.2/lib/active_support
/core_ext/string/inflections.rb:148:in `constantize'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railroad-0.4.0/lib/railroad/models_dia
gram.rb:25:in `generate'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railroad-0.4.0/lib/railroad/models_dia
gram.rb:24:in `each'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railroad-0.4.0/lib/railroad/models_dia
gram.rb:24:in `generate'

        from
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/railroad-0.4.0/bin/railroad:40

        from /usr/local/bin/railroad:16:in `load'

        from /usr/local/bin/railroad:16

=20

=20

This "pd.rb" in the error uses the postgre db conection.

The contents of the pd.rb file are=20

=20

"

class PD < ActiveRecord::Base

  connection =3D "puredisk_#{ENV['RAILS_ENV']}"

  establish_connection connection.to_sym

end

=20

class PD::Policy < PD; set_table_name 'policy'; end

class PD::Dsinpolicies < PD; set_table_name 'dsinpolicies'; end

class PD::Dataselection < PD; set_table_name 'dataselection'; end

class PD::Agent < PD; set_table_name 'agent'; end

class PD::Job < PD; set_table_name 'job'; end

class PD::Policyrun < PD; set_table_name 'policyrun'; end

class PD::Dstemplate < PD; set_table_name 'dataselectiontemplate'; end

class PD::Policytype < PD; set_table_name 'policytype'; end

"

=20

And the rails_env is "development"

=20

Thanks in advance ..

=20

Regards,

Anand.

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20

=20



This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain =
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have =
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete =
the original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

In This Thread

Prev Next