From: Charles Oliver Nutter Date: 2007-11-11T18:05:33+09:00 Subject: Re: method names in 1.9 Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > > In message "Re: method names in 1.9" > on Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:55:48 +0900, "David A. Black" writes: > > |I know that a 1.9 feature-freeze is coming soon, but I just wanted to > |put in a last-minute plea for some method name changes or removals. > > - send, invoke_method > > #send now invokes any method regardless of visibility (as in 1.8) so > that the alternative version of "send" (currently named > 'invoke_method') honors visibility. I don't think adding "bang" for > the safer version is a good idea. Any other idea? What's the use-case/reason for providing a visibility-honoring send? - Charlie