[#1649] Re: New Ruby projects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1672] Re: Ruby 1.4 stable manual bug? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1673] Re: Possible problem with ext/socket in 1.5.2 — itojun@...
[#1694] Conventions for our Ruby book — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1715] Install postgresql support — Ikhlasul Amal <amal@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
[#1786] Is this a bug? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
(mailed & posted)
[#1814] Objects nested sometimes. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I am attemptiong to write a package which consists of a workspace
[#1816] Ruby 1.5.3 under Tru64 (Alpha)? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
Hi,
Hi,
[#1834] enum examples? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Has anyone any examplse of using the Enumerable module? I've had a
[#1844] Minor irritation, can't figure out how to patch it though! — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I was considering how difficult it would be to patch Ruby to accept
[#1889] [ruby-1.5.3] require / SAFE — ts <decoux@...>
[#1896] Ruby Syntax similar to other languages? — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1900] Enumerations and all that. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Thank you to the people who responded to my questions about Enumerated
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 16 Mar 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#1929] Re: Class Variables — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
| "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@cuna.com> writes:
[#1942] no Fixnum#new ? — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>
Ok, I can add methods to a built-in class well enough (yes I know about succ,
[#1989] English Ruby/Gtk Tutorial? — schneik@...
Hi,
[#2022] rb_global_entry — ts <decoux@...>
[#2036] Anonymous and Singleton Classes — B_DAVISON <Bob.Davison@...>
I am a Ruby newbie and having some problems getting my mind around certain
[#2069] Ruby/GTK+ question about imlib --> gdk-pixbug — schneik@...
[#2073] Re: eval.rb fails — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
The doc is fine, this happens only if you try to execute 'until' block
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Dat Nguyen wrote:
[#2084] Scope violated by import via 'require'? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#2104] ARGF or $< — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Has anyone any examples of how to use ARGF or $< as I cannot find much
Hi.
[#2165] Ruby strict mode and stand-alone executables. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Some people want Ruby to have a strict compile mode.
[#2203] Re: parse bug in 1.5 — schneik@...
[#2212] Re: Ruby/Glade usage questions. — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "m" == mrilu <mrilu@ale.cx> writes:
[#2241] setter() for local variables — ts <decoux@...>
[#2256] Multiple assignment of pattern match results. — schneik@...
[#2267] Re: Ruby and Eiffel — h.fulton@...
[#2309] Question about attribute writers — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:
[ruby-talk:02287] ANNOUNCE: CFV (call for votes) on comp.lang.ruby
OK future comp.lang.ruby fans, here is your big chance!
The CFV (call for votes) for comp.lang.ruby has been officially posted on
the following newsgroups:
news.announce.newsgroups
news.groups
comp.lang.java.programmer
comp.lang.misc
comp.lang.perl.misc
comp.lang.python
The subject line is "CFV: comp.lang.ruby". The posting date is: 3/30/00.
To vote, first look up the CFV on any of the above newsgroups.
Then _carefully_ read the "HOW TO VOTE" and "IMPORTANT VOTING PROCEDURE
NOTES".
Then _follow_ the voting instructions very _carefully_.
Once you are done voting, please reread "IMPORTANT VOTING PROCEDURE NOTES".
OK, if everyone on the Ruby mail lists do this, then we have a pretty good
chance of getting comp.lang.ruby.
At least 2/3s of the votes must be yes votes, and a minimum of 100 yes votes
are required. Obviously it would be a good idea to get several hundred yes
votes since there is a significant amount of skepticism among news.groups
regulars about whether there is sufficient present interest (and thus likely
traffic) to justify comp.lang.ruby, so there will probably a somewhat larger
than usual number of no votes from them.
Finally, please DO NOT DISTRIBUTE the comp.lang.ruby CFV--which also means
DO NOT POST it. (The people who oversee this process are pretty savvy about
such things. They do not care about excuses for breaking the rules since
scoundrels commonly arrange to have plausible excuses. They were not born
yesterday and some of them will likely check archives and such. There is a
period of time after the CFV closes for people to raise such issues in order
to block newsgroup approvals. Don't supply them with ammunition.)
The voting will close just before midnight UTC on 20 April 2000.
Happy voting,
Conrad
P.S.: Matz, Could you please forward this to the other Ruby mail lists?
Thanks much.