[#1649] Re: New Ruby projects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1672] Re: Ruby 1.4 stable manual bug? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1673] Re: Possible problem with ext/socket in 1.5.2 — itojun@...
[#1694] Conventions for our Ruby book — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1715] Install postgresql support — Ikhlasul Amal <amal@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
[#1786] Is this a bug? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
(mailed & posted)
[#1814] Objects nested sometimes. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I am attemptiong to write a package which consists of a workspace
[#1816] Ruby 1.5.3 under Tru64 (Alpha)? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
Hi,
Hi,
[#1834] enum examples? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Has anyone any examplse of using the Enumerable module? I've had a
[#1844] Minor irritation, can't figure out how to patch it though! — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I was considering how difficult it would be to patch Ruby to accept
[#1889] [ruby-1.5.3] require / SAFE — ts <decoux@...>
[#1896] Ruby Syntax similar to other languages? — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1900] Enumerations and all that. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Thank you to the people who responded to my questions about Enumerated
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 16 Mar 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#1929] Re: Class Variables — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
| "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@cuna.com> writes:
[#1942] no Fixnum#new ? — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>
Ok, I can add methods to a built-in class well enough (yes I know about succ,
[#1989] English Ruby/Gtk Tutorial? — schneik@...
Hi,
[#2022] rb_global_entry — ts <decoux@...>
[#2036] Anonymous and Singleton Classes — B_DAVISON <Bob.Davison@...>
I am a Ruby newbie and having some problems getting my mind around certain
[#2069] Ruby/GTK+ question about imlib --> gdk-pixbug — schneik@...
[#2073] Re: eval.rb fails — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
The doc is fine, this happens only if you try to execute 'until' block
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Dat Nguyen wrote:
[#2084] Scope violated by import via 'require'? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#2104] ARGF or $< — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Has anyone any examples of how to use ARGF or $< as I cannot find much
Hi.
[#2165] Ruby strict mode and stand-alone executables. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Some people want Ruby to have a strict compile mode.
[#2203] Re: parse bug in 1.5 — schneik@...
[#2212] Re: Ruby/Glade usage questions. — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "m" == mrilu <mrilu@ale.cx> writes:
[#2241] setter() for local variables — ts <decoux@...>
[#2256] Multiple assignment of pattern match results. — schneik@...
[#2267] Re: Ruby and Eiffel — h.fulton@...
[#2309] Question about attribute writers — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:
[ruby-talk:01659] Re: New Ruby projects
Conrad Schneiker writes: > ((comp.lang.misc + cc: ruby-lang ML)) > > From: Guy N. Hurst <gnhurst@hurstlinks.com> ... > What do others think about making wxWindows the default (not > exclusive, just default) cross-platform Ruby GUI and including > Ruby/wxWindows as part of the standard Ruby distribution? Nononono!!! Please not! Let me explain. wxWindows is *not* a pure toolkit at all. It resembles a class framework like e.g. MFC do. Itself it relies on underlaying toolkit to do its task. Under Windows it seems to use the Native window widgets. Under X11 it use the Gimp toolkit (GTK). wxWindows is written in C++. We cannot direcly use C++ for Ruby extensions. We have to write C wrappers around every C++ method! So what we will get are Ruby classes written in C wrapping C++ methods of wxWindows, that itself are wrapping e.g. GTK under X11 (BTW: which is written in C itself) to do the X11 calls for displaying widgets. That sounds silly for me! And very complicate too! I do not say, that we should not have such beast, but *please* not as default GUI! If there is such a default GUI, I would propose FLTK. Although it is also written in C++, but it does not itself wrap another toolkit! It relies on the native primitives of X11, Windows or Mac. It is damned fast and easy to use. Its memory footprint is very small and it is *very* powerful! Furthermore it comes with a GUI builder too. It should not be too difficult to write a parser that is able to read the GUI builder's file format to use it to build the GUI for Ruby dynamically (somewhat like Glade/Ruby by Yashi. Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@jaist.ac.jp> has already begun to wrap FLTK for Ruby. Perhaps somebody could help him. I would do, but I have not any time currently :-( > (Incidentally, another design consideration for the Ruby/wxWindows > module is to anticipate the possibility of really good > cross-platform availability/support of GTK some 2 or 4 or 6 years > from now, in which case we would want to make it as easy as possible > to make GTK the new default Ruby GUI, while preserving the wxWindows > interface with the wxWindows/GTK binding.) FLTK is more cross platform than wxWindows, AFAIK. And it is much leaner and faster than that (e.g. the GUI builder, statically linked without debug information, stripped, with *all* widgets build-in 836976KB under Solaris 7). Just my 0.02$ > > Conrad \cle ..