[#1816] Ruby 1.5.3 under Tru64 (Alpha)? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2000/03/14

[#1989] English Ruby/Gtk Tutorial? — schneik@...

18 messages 2000/03/17

[#2241] setter() for local variables — ts <decoux@...>

18 messages 2000/03/29

[ruby-talk:01695] Re: Conventions for our Ruby book

From: Tomoyuki Kosimizu <greentea@...2.so-net.ne.jp>
Date: 2000-03-02 18:14:07 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1695
Hi,

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
Subject: [ruby-talk:01694] Conventions for our Ruby book
Date: 02 Mar 2000 11:38:37 -0600

> So, we were wondering what people thought. Is the '#' notation a good
> one? Will is confuse newcomers who pick up the book? Is there any
> alternative that might be easier to read (For example, String.new, but 
> <i>String</i>.downcase)? What should we do?

Using '#' is very popular in Java community. I think no need for
alternatives.

Tomoyuki Kosimizu
greentea@fa2.so-net.ne.jp

In This Thread