From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-03-17T12:41:33-06:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:01986] Re: Time::at

"David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@cuna.com> writes:

> | Try
> |         print ">>>>", Time.at(57827), "\n";
> | 
> | or
> |         print ">>>>", Time::at(57827), "\n";
> 
> That worked beautifully!  I'm actually beginning to understand this :-)
> 
> DING DING DING a light goes on..... since I didn't say "Time.at"
> it implied Object.at - and there wasn't any.  Hmm.....
> 
> Esoteric question: what's the difference between Time::at and Time.at ?

three dots