[#1816] Ruby 1.5.3 under Tru64 (Alpha)? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2000/03/14

[#1989] English Ruby/Gtk Tutorial? — schneik@...

18 messages 2000/03/17

[#2241] setter() for local variables — ts <decoux@...>

18 messages 2000/03/29

[ruby-talk:01998] Re: no Fixnum#new ?

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Date: 2000-03-18 05:42:29 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1998
From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>

> Quinn Dunkan <quinn@envy.ugcs.caltech.edu> writes:
>
> > Also, to add to the 'initialize' vs 'initialise' debate, I like 'init'
the
> > best.  Less typing.  Doesn't annoy British people.
>
> Heh! I'm British. I'm not annoyed. Strange, but not annoyed.
>
> > Just as obvious meaning.  What more could you want?
>
> I like init too. If we do go with it though, we'll need something like
> a full release cycle where Ruby warns if it comes across an instance
> method called init--something like:
>
>   warning: in the next release of Ruby method 'init' will acquire
>            mystic significance and this code probably won't work
>
> Just to give people time to switch over.

I also want to vote for 'init'.

Conrad

In This Thread