From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2000-03-18T10:23:24+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:01996] Re: Ruby Syntax similar to other languages? In message "[ruby-talk:01962] Re: Ruby Syntax similar to other languages?" on 00/03/17, Clemens Hintze writes: |> What's the benefit of foo.s(/pat/, "repl", "g") over foo.gsub(/pat/, |> "repl")? | |Only to have not *two* methods, but only one. But then I would prefer |an additional flags argument like this: Hmm, saving brain's memory slot? |But I think I can also live with the current 4 methods :-) I welcome other's opinion.