[#1649] Re: New Ruby projects — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1672] Re: Ruby 1.4 stable manual bug? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
[#1673] Re: Possible problem with ext/socket in 1.5.2 — itojun@...
[#1694] Conventions for our Ruby book — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
[#1715] Install postgresql support — Ikhlasul Amal <amal@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
[#1786] Is this a bug? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
(mailed & posted)
[#1814] Objects nested sometimes. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I am attemptiong to write a package which consists of a workspace
[#1816] Ruby 1.5.3 under Tru64 (Alpha)? — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
Hi all,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
Hi,
Hi,
[#1834] enum examples? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Has anyone any examplse of using the Enumerable module? I've had a
[#1844] Minor irritation, can't figure out how to patch it though! — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I was considering how difficult it would be to patch Ruby to accept
[#1889] [ruby-1.5.3] require / SAFE — ts <decoux@...>
[#1896] Ruby Syntax similar to other languages? — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1900] Enumerations and all that. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Thank you to the people who responded to my questions about Enumerated
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
On 16 Mar 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#1929] Re: Class Variables — "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
| "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@cuna.com> writes:
[#1942] no Fixnum#new ? — Quinn Dunkan <quinn@...>
Ok, I can add methods to a built-in class well enough (yes I know about succ,
[#1989] English Ruby/Gtk Tutorial? — schneik@...
Hi,
[#2022] rb_global_entry — ts <decoux@...>
[#2036] Anonymous and Singleton Classes — B_DAVISON <Bob.Davison@...>
I am a Ruby newbie and having some problems getting my mind around certain
[#2069] Ruby/GTK+ question about imlib --> gdk-pixbug — schneik@...
[#2073] Re: eval.rb fails — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
The doc is fine, this happens only if you try to execute 'until' block
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Dat Nguyen wrote:
[#2084] Scope violated by import via 'require'? — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>
Hi,
[#2104] ARGF or $< — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Has anyone any examples of how to use ARGF or $< as I cannot find much
Hi.
[#2165] Ruby strict mode and stand-alone executables. — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...>
Some people want Ruby to have a strict compile mode.
[#2203] Re: parse bug in 1.5 — schneik@...
[#2212] Re: Ruby/Glade usage questions. — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "m" == mrilu <mrilu@ale.cx> writes:
[#2241] setter() for local variables — ts <decoux@...>
[#2256] Multiple assignment of pattern match results. — schneik@...
[#2267] Re: Ruby and Eiffel — h.fulton@...
[#2309] Question about attribute writers — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:
[ruby-talk:01719] Ruby GUIs
((comp.lang.misc + cc: ruby-lang ML)) [Changed title to better reflect current topic.] From: Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> .... > Conrad Schneiker writes: .... > > Good try--except that FLTK is leftover from an abandoned project and seems > > Uh?!? I thought, I know the history (the official one!). Was it > changed last year? :-/ Just what I got reading their home page some time ago. They should let you revise it for them! .... > They work on drastic improvements that would lead to > FLTK 2. OK, I'll wait and see. You (among other people and other things) have convinced me not to work on any cross-platform GUI stuff for time being, whether FLTK or wxWindows. The main "other thing" is that I finally have a working Ruby GUI on one of two types of systems that I use a lot, where Tk didn't work. I am now able to use Ruby/GTK on AIX 4.3 with precompiled gtk+, and it (or at least all the demos I've tried) work great. :-( ----> 8-))) I may also try to see if I can get gtk+ and Ruby/GTK working on Windows NT 4 as well. (Even if the Tk problems I encountered were fixed on both platforms, after seeing Ruby/GTK, I don't think I would ever want to go back to Tk.) > > Would you, Matz, and other people support putting Ruby/GTK in the standard > > distribution? > > I would use Ruby/GTK instead of wxWindows if I have a choice! But if > the Ruby/FLTK extension is ready, I will forget all the other and use > this; regardless of what is default GUI in Ruby ;-))) That's fine with me, but this last question wasn't a question about default Ruby GUI. Sorry if I didn't make that clear. This is just a question about whether the Ruby/GTK module could be included as part of standard distribution. Then, if (when/more) Linux venders (and other Unix vendors that supported GTK) were to include Ruby like most do with Perl and more are doing with Python, then users would be able to run Ruby/GTK programs out of the box, without downloading and building and installing additional stuff. (I'd also support the same thing for FLTK2 if it turns out like you expect.) Conrad