From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2000-03-22T06:25:38+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:02062] Re: Anonymous and Singleton Classes Hi, In message "[ruby-talk:02050] Re: Anonymous and Singleton Classes" on 00/03/21, B_DAVISON writes: |OK, so would I be right in saying that it's an implementation thing and you |want to keep that hidden so the implementation can change? Perhaps using the |term 'class' in the description of these things is misleading (or might be in |the future if the implementation changes :-) Hmm, there was discussion about this matter before, without explicit conclusion. Let's talk it again. What should we call `class <