[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12
[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12
[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[ruby-core:33858] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support

From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Date: 2010-12-24 21:32:14 UTC
List: ruby-core #33858
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:19:12AM +0900, Martin Bosslet wrote:
> Feature #4183: [ext/openssl] Timestamp support
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4183
> 
> Author: Martin Bosslet
> Status: Open, Priority: Normal
> Category: ext, Target version: 1.9.2
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to propose the attached code to support timestamp creation and verification in ext/openssl under a new module OpenSSL::Timestamp. It comes also with various tests and rDoc documentation. Since OpenSSL only supports timestamps beginning with OpenSSL 1.0, the entire code is in #if brackets and the module is defined only for OpenSSL versions >= 1.0. 

I think this is good functionality to add.

The patch seems good.  I noticed some code that is not necessary though.
You can remove these lines:

    /*
     * Creates a Factory.
     *
     * call-seq:
     *       OpenSSL::Timestamp::Factory.new    -> Factory
     */
    static VALUE
    ossl_tsfac_initialize(VALUE self)
    {
        return self;
    }

    rb_define_method(cTimestampFactory, "initialize", ossl_tsfac_initialize, 0);

and everything will Just Work™.

This patch is really long, so if nobody objects after a week or two,
I'll apply.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread