[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12
[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12
[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[ruby-core:33885] Re: Getting involved in Ruby

From: Yugui <yugui@...>
Date: 2010-12-26 01:40:49 UTC
List: ruby-core #33885
Hi Loren,

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Loren Segal <lsegal@soen.ca> wrote:
> If we are going to be accepting Doxygen-style @tag based comments, why not
> just start switching over to YARD syntax for both the C API and Ruby
> documentations?
(snip)
> I'd be interested in extending
> support for YARD to better cover the lower level C side of the Ruby API, if
> there was willingness from the Ruby devs to commit to a single syntax for
> documentation.

I wrote a preprocessor that skips RDoc for doxygen,
tool/strip-rdoc.rb.  But your proposal seems much smarter. It is
really exciting.

We need to discuss carefully and need an approval by ruby-core before
changing RDoc into YARD.  Could you post your proposal as a feature
request issue at the redmine?
I worry about difference between what Ruby API reference needs and
what C API reference needs.  Doxygen comment describes how Ruby is
implemented.
A YARD doc for a method implementation will be good for C API doc too.
But I don't hope description like class_alloc()'s appears in Ruby API
documentation. How can we distinguish them?

-- 
Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)
yugui@yugui.jp
http://yugui.jp

In This Thread