[#33511] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4108][Open] irb hangs on Windows with trunk — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Bug #4108: irb hangs on Windows with trunk
[#33521] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4111][Open] Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP — Geoff Youngs <redmine@...>
Feature #4111: Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP
[#33530] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4113][Open] Cannot build trunk with MSVC. — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Bug #4113: Cannot build trunk with MSVC.
[#33583] Initialization time — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#33605] Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Asher <asher@...>
in 1.8 SyncEnumerator is in lib/generator.rb; in 1.9 it is in lib/rexml/syncenumerator.rb
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:09 PM, Asher wrote:
If that is the case, it would make sense historically, but doesn't seem to make much sense now, as SyncEnumerator doesn't seem to have any relation to REXML, even if REXML utilizes it.
[#33628] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4132][Open] Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice — Claudio Villalobos <redmine@...>
Bug #4132: Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice
[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>
Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables
Issue #4136 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
Hi,
[#33648] Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
IO implements #freeze, but StringIO doesn’t. What’s up with that?
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:09, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#33656] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4141][Open] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #4141: Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Hidetoshi NAGAI
[#33661] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4145][Open] The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Feature #4145: The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation
Issue #4145 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>
Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library
Issue #4149 has been updated by mathew murphy.
[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Hi.
2010/12/12 "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:
Hello Akira,
2010/12/20 "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:
Hi!
2010/12/27 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:
Hi!
[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey folks,
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>wrote:
(2010/12/13 1:54), Haase, Konstantin wrote:
(2010/12/13 9:06), Ryan Davis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
On Dec 14, 2010, at 09:47 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Haase, Konstantin
[#33690] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153][Open] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Robert Pankowecki <redmine@...>
Bug #4153: Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code
[#33735] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Assigned] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
Bug #4163: RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:46:33AM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:
[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>
Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9
Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.
[#33779] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174][Open] 1F1E on rdoc tests — Kouhei Yanagita <redmine@...>
Bug #4174: 1F1E on rdoc tests
[#33801] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Martin Bosslet <redmine@...>
Feature #4183: [ext/openssl] Timestamp support
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:19:12AM +0900, Martin Bosslet wrote:
[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>
As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.
Hi,
[#33818] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4188][Open] minitest warnings in 1.9.3 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #4188: minitest warnings in 1.9.3
[#33825] PATCH: REE fast-thread.patch: stack_free() not called in rb_thread_die(). — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
http://code.google.com/p/rubyenterpriseedition/issues/detail?id=57
Similar technique might be relevant in MRI 1.9 if fiber/continuation
> Similar technique might be relevant in MRI 1.9 if fiber/continuation stacks
[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:
[#33845] Getting involved in Ruby — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Hi dear Ruby core team !
[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library
Issue #4197 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#33852] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4199][Open] make test ruby-1.9.2-p0 failed on Solaris10 x86 — Dmitry Perfilyev <redmine@...>
Bug #4199: make test ruby-1.9.2-p0 failed on Solaris10 x86
[#33864] [Backport92-Backport#4200][Open] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>
Backport #4200: minitest 2.0.2 on trunk
Issue #4200 has been updated by Ryan Davis.
[#33880] As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:50 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
Luis,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:
[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>
Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax
On Dec 26, 2010, at 13:00, Loren Segal wrote:
Issue #4211 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:01:00PM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:
[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>
Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows
Issue #4214 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#33948] Multi-line comments — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
I was always curious about the reasoning Ruby doesn't support
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com
On 28-12-2010 01:54, Joshua Ballanco wrote:
[#33951] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217][Open] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...>
Bug #4217: irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows
Issue #4217 has been updated by Heesob Park.
[#33953] my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — deepak kannan <kannan.deepak@...>
hi,
[#34011] [Backport92-Backport#4228][Open] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Backport #4228: Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems
[#34023] ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Is there a reason why ruby -h doesn't show --disable-gems ?
2011/1/4 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:14 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
[ruby-core:33672] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4145][Assigned] The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation
(2010/12/10 18:14), "Martin J. D端rst" wrote: > We should try to get a better overall idea of what "UTF-16" and so on > are for. I asked some questions at the very end of [ruby-core:33461]. > Yui, can you try to give answers? I hope this will help having a > general discussion of the issues involved. Current implementation is what I thought to be. > My main questions here are: > A) Which one of the above is the current Ruby implementation effort > (the above patch and a few related ones) targetting? This is, 2b) XML strictly requires a BOM. Because the spec (2a) collides the real (2c). > B) How complete is that implementation (thought to be)? Current one is completed one. > C) What about other implementation needs? Nothing, in current situation. > D) What can we do to make sure users have at least a chance of > understanding what "UTF-16" in Ruby is good for? This is open problem, but so I implement it and am seeing user's reactions. -- NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp>