[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12
[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12
[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[ruby-core:33918] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries?

From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2010-12-27 02:05:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #33918
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:50 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In message "[ruby-core:33880] As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries?"
> 瀰n Dec.26,2010 04:50:32, <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've committed the fix in trunk, as it indeed corrected the issue, and
>> created a backport #4205:
>> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4205
>
> Very good.
>
>
>> Assigned it to Ruby 1.9.2 maintainer, Yui NARUSE.
>
> 1.9.2 branch maintainer is Yuki Sonoda (a.k.a. yugui).
>

Thank you, I've reassigned it after noticing the nickname/name relation.

>
>> I was wondering if due the Windows nature of the bug, should I
>> backport myself, or that will be a violation of these boundaries?
>
> You should not commit to release branches.
> It's the branch maintainer's matter.
> You can commit to release branches only when you are requested
> directly by him/her.
>
> FYI;
> [...]

Thank you,

That was the information I was looking for. Again, thank you for clarifying it.

Regards,
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exup駻y

In This Thread