From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2010-12-08T06:06:50+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:33625] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML?


On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:17 , Asher wrote:

> If that is the case, it would make sense historically, but doesn't seem to make much sense now, as SyncEnumerator doesn't seem to have any relation to REXML, even if REXML utilizes it. 
> 
> Can we move SyncEnumerator elsewhere? 

It _should_ go away... but that requires an update from the rexml maintainer. Something we haven't seen in a long time iirc.

I'd rather see rexml get gemmed and installed as a gem upon ruby installation. Then it isn't our problem.