ruby-core

[#33500] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4104][Open] String#hash should return different value for different string. — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Feature #4104: String#hash should return different value for different string.

2 messages 2010/12/01

[#33502] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4104][Closed] String#hash should return different value for different string. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/12/01

Issue #4104 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#33503] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4105][Open] Bug in numeric.c for Borland compiler — W van den Bos <redmine@...>

Bug #4105: Bug in numeric.c for Borland compiler

3 messages 2010/12/01

[#33504] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4105][Open] Bug in numeric.c for Borland compiler — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/12/01

> This will only appear when borland and for example microsoft dll's are mixed.

[#33505] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4105][Closed] Bug in numeric.c for Borland compiler — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/01

Issue #4105 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33506] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4106][Open] 1.9.2 regression - invoking protected singleton methods — Dion Mendel <redmine@...>

Bug #4106: 1.9.2 regression - invoking protected singleton methods

3 messages 2010/12/01

[#33534] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4106][Closed] 1.9.2 regression - invoking protected singleton methods — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/12/03

Issue #4106 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#33545] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4106] 1.9.2 regression - invoking protected singleton methods — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2010/12/03

Issue #4106 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.

[#33510] [Backport87-Backport#4107][Open] Errno::EINVAL from ri on mswin32 build — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #4107: Errno::EINVAL from ri on mswin32 build

1 message 2010/12/02

[#33511] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4108][Open] irb hangs on Windows with trunk — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #4108: irb hangs on Windows with trunk

4 messages 2010/12/02

[#33512] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4108][Closed] irb hangs on Windows with trunk — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/02

Issue #4108 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33513] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4108][Closed] irb hangs on Windows with trunk — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2010/12/02

2010/12/2 Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:

[#33514] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4108][Closed] irb hangs on Windows with trunk — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/12/02

Hello,

[#33521] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4111][Open] Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP — Geoff Youngs <redmine@...>

Feature #4111: Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP

5 messages 2010/12/02

[#33526] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4111][Open] Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/02

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:14:22PM +0900, Geoff Youngs wrote:

[#33547] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4111][Open] Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33613] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4111][Closed] Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2010/12/07

Issue #4111 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#33571] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4111] Add XLIST support to Net::IMAP — Geoff Youngs <redmine@...> 2010/12/04

Issue #4111 has been updated by Geoff Youngs.

[#33525] Compilation error for ruby_1_9_2 branch (MinGW) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

1 message 2010/12/02

[#33527] Redmine: grant permissions to ruby and 1.8 projects — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2010/12/02

[#33528] Re: Redmine: grant permissions to ruby and 1.8 projects — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/12/03

done.

[#33530] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4113][Open] Cannot build trunk with MSVC. — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #4113: Cannot build trunk with MSVC.

4 messages 2010/12/03

[#33533] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4113][Open] Cannot build trunk with MSVC. — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33542] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4113][Open] Cannot build trunk with MSVC. — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2010/12/03

Hi,

[#33536] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4113][Closed] Cannot build trunk with MSVC. — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/03

Issue #4113 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33544] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4114][Open] make: *** No rule to make target `config.rb', needed by `cygruby191.rc'. Stop. — neomjp neomjp <redmine@...>

Bug #4114: make: *** No rule to make target `config.rb', needed by `cygruby191.rc'. Stop.

3 messages 2010/12/03

[#33755] [Backport92-Backport#4114] make: *** No rule to make target `config.rb', needed by `cygruby191.rc'. Stop. — neomjp neomjp <redmine@...> 2010/12/17

Issue #4114 has been updated by neomjp neomjp.

[#33757] [Backport92-Backport#4114][Closed] make: *** No rule to make target `config.rb', needed by `cygruby191.rc'. Stop. — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/12/17

Issue #4114 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#33549] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4115][Open] Faster ERB patch — Simon Chiang <redmine@...>

Feature #4115: Faster ERB patch

1 message 2010/12/03

[#33560] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4116][Open] OpenSSL::X509::Name provides <=> but not == — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Feature #4116: OpenSSL::X509::Name provides <=> but not ==

3 messages 2010/12/04

[#33650] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4116] OpenSSL::X509::Name provides <=> but not == — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/12/09

Issue #4116 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#33674] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4116][Closed] OpenSSL::X509::Name provides <=> but not == — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4116 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#33574] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4117][Open] irb: typo when parsing command line options — Julien Pervillé <redmine@...>

Bug #4117: irb: typo when parsing command line options

2 messages 2010/12/04

[#33581] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4117][Closed] irb: typo when parsing command line options — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/12/05

Issue #4117 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#33580] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4119][Open] about encoding convertion — jason joo <redmine@...>

Bug #4119: about encoding convertion

2 messages 2010/12/05

[#33582] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4119][Rejected] about encoding convertion — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/05

Issue #4119 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33583] Initialization time — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2010/12/05

[#33584] Re: Initialization time — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/05

2010/12/5 SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net>

[#33585] Re: Initialization time — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2010/12/05

(2010/12/06 4:32), Luis Lavena wrote:

[#33593] Re: Initialization time — hemant <gethemant@...> 2010/12/06

Hi,

[#33599] Re: Initialization time — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2010/12/06

(2010/12/06 19:57), hemant wrote:

[#33620] Re: Initialization time — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/07

[#33591] Re: [ruby-cvs:37282] Ruby:r30090 (trunk): Add toplevel documentation for OpenSSL — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

This is a notice that I have committed some documentation for OpenSSL.

1 message 2010/12/06

[#33592] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4123][Open] thread-safe problem in libxml_ruby.so — tracy qin <redmine@...>

Bug #4123: thread-safe problem in libxml_ruby.so

2 messages 2010/12/06

[#33900] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4123][Third Party's Issue] thread-safe problem in libxml_ruby.so — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4123 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33597] Building with profile (gprof) options hands during configure (MinGW) — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

1 message 2010/12/06

[#33604] 1.9.2 release to fix — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I don't think I've seen anything on this list about this, so I'm checking to make sure it is on the radar.

5 messages 2010/12/07

[#33611] Re: 1.9.2 release to fix [irb and friends] — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/07

Also, multiple patches have been applied since p0 to prevent segfaults. Sinatra has to include code to avoid running into those (everything works fine on the 1.9.2 branch).

[#33607] Re: 1.9.2 release to fix [irb and friends] — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/07

fixed subject. sorry. going too fast today.

[#33618] Re: 1.9.2 release to fix — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/07

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#33619] Re: 1.9.2 release to fix — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/07

[#33605] Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Asher <asher@...>

in 1.8 SyncEnumerator is in lib/generator.rb; in 1.9 it is in lib/rexml/syncenumerator.rb

8 messages 2010/12/07

[#33623] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/12/07

On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:09 PM, Asher wrote:

[#33624] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Asher <asher@...> 2010/12/07

If that is the case, it would make sense historically, but doesn't seem to make much sense now, as SyncEnumerator doesn't seem to have any relation to REXML, even if REXML utilizes it.

[#33625] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/07

[#33626] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Asher <asher@...> 2010/12/07

I don't really care about REXML but I've seen several people who felt the need to use SyncEnumerator.

[#33627] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2010/12/07

On Dec 7, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Asher wrote:

[#33636] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Manfred Stienstra <manfred@...> 2010/12/08

On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:25 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#33717] Re: Why is SyncEnumerator in REXML? — Ken Bloom <kbloom@...> 2010/12/14

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:25:18 +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#33628] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4132][Open] Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice — Claudio Villalobos <redmine@...>

Bug #4132: Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice

5 messages 2010/12/07

[#33630] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4132] Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice — Claudio Villalobos <redmine@...> 2010/12/08

Issue #4132 has been updated by Claudio Villalobos.

[#33631] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4132] Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/12/08

Hi,

[#33629] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4132][Open] Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/12/08

Hi,

[#33632] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4132] Socket.close attempting to close the socket twice — Claudio Villalobos <redmine@...> 2010/12/08

Issue #4132 has been updated by Claudio Villalobos.

[#33634] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4133][Open] Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #4133: Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk

2 messages 2010/12/08

[#33660] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4133][Closed] Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4133 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33635] [Backport92-Backport#4018][Closed] String#<< can result in string that lies about String#valid_encoding? — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>

Issue #4018 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

1 message 2010/12/08

[#33637] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4135][Open] bug in calculations in 1.9.3dev / 1.9.2 — Dmitrii Samoilov <redmine@...>

Bug #4135: bug in calculations in 1.9.3dev / 1.9.2

3 messages 2010/12/08

[#33638] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4135] bug in calculations in 1.9.3dev / 1.9.2 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/08

Issue #4135 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33639] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4135] bug in calculations in 1.9.3dev / 1.9.2 — Dmitrii Samoilov <redmine@...> 2010/12/08

Issue #4135 has been updated by Dmitrii Samoilov.

[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33641] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2010/12/08

Issue #4136 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#33643] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...> 2010/12/08

Issue #4136 has been updated by Hiro Asari.

[#33644] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Closed] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2010/12/09

Issue #4136 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#33645] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/09

[#33647] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Paul Mucur <redmine@...> 2010/12/09

Issue #4136 has been updated by Paul Mucur.

[#33704] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2010/12/13

Issue #4136 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#33705] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/12/14

Hi,

[#33720] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/12/15

Hi,

[#33723] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/15

On 15 December 2010 05:32, Marc-Andre Lafortune

[#33642] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4139][Open] abort and core dump in ruby 1.8.7-p302 — David Trusty <redmine@...>

Bug #4139: abort and core dump in ruby 1.8.7-p302

2 messages 2010/12/08

[#34674] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4139] abort and core dump in ruby 1.8.7-p302 — David Trusty <redmine@...> 2011/01/20

Issue #4139 has been updated by David Trusty.

[#33646] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4140][Open] segfault recursion inside a thread — Luis Lopez <redmine@...>

Bug #4140: segfault recursion inside a thread

1 message 2010/12/09

[#33648] Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>

IO implements #freeze, but StringIO doesn’t. What’s up with that?

7 messages 2010/12/09

[#34002] Re: [ruby-core:33648] Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2010/12/29

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 16:34, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#34003] Re: [ruby-core:33648] Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/30

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 07:29:36AM +0900, Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#34012] Re: Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/31

Hi,

[#34017] Re: [ruby-core:34012] Re: Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2010/12/31

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:09, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34068] Re: [ruby-core:34017] Re: [ruby-core:34012] Re: Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/01/04

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:14, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:

[#34075] Re: [ruby-core:34068] Re: [ruby-core:34017] Re: [ruby-core:34012] Re: Why doesn’t StringIO implement #freeze? — Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@...> 2011/01/05

On 01/04/2011 01:49 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#33656] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4141][Open] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Bug #4141: Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination

5 messages 2010/12/09

[#33917] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4141][Open] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2010/12/27

Hi,

[#33922] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4141][Open] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/27

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Hidetoshi NAGAI

[#33947] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4141][Open] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2010/12/28

From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>

[#33960] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4141][Open] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/28

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Hidetoshi NAGAI

[#33657] unnecessary mkdir(lock) in tempfile.rb — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>

Since tempfile.rb uses the O_EXCL flag as of r816 (July 2000), there is

3 messages 2010/12/09

[#33658] Re: unnecessary mkdir(lock) in tempfile.rb — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2010/12/09

Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:

[#33765] Re: unnecessary mkdir(lock) in tempfile.rb — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/18

Hi,

[#33661] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4145][Open] The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Feature #4145: The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation

4 messages 2010/12/10

[#33662] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4145][Assigned] The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4145 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33663] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4145][Assigned] The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/10

We should try to get a better overall idea of what "UTF-16" and so on

[#33672] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4145][Assigned] The result of UTF-16 encoded string concatenation — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/12/10

(2010/12/10 18:14), "Martin J. D端rst" wrote:

[#33664] [Backport87-Backport#4148][Open] Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows — Marc Rene Arns <redmine@...>

Backport #4148: Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows

6 messages 2010/12/10

[#34182] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4148] Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows — René van den Berg <redmine@...> 2011/01/06

Issue #4148 has been updated by Ren辿 van den Berg.

[#34184] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4148] Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2011/01/06

Issue #4148 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33669] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4148] Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4148 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#33665] [Backport87-Backport#4148] Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows — Marc Rene Arns <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4148 has been updated by Marc Rene Arns.

[#33666] [Backport87-Backport#4148] Time#strftime with %T broken on Windows — Marc Rene Arns <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4148 has been updated by Marc Rene Arns.

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33673] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4149 has been updated by mathew murphy.

[#33675] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/10

[#35158] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...> 2011/02/08

Issue #4149 has been updated by mathew murphy.

[#33670] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/12/10

Issue #4149 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#33678] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...> 2010/12/11

Issue #4149 has been updated by mathew murphy.

[#33718] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew <meta@...> 2010/12/14

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:25, mathew murphy <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33719] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/15

On Dec 14, 2010, at 12:12, mathew wrote:

[#35326] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Closed] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2011/02/21

Issue #4149 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#33786] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...> 2010/12/20

Issue #4149 has been updated by mathew murphy.

[#35159] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2011/02/09

Issue #4149 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#33676] is openssl required for ruby tests? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

I'm working on adding more tests to openssl. I noticed many of the

1 message 2010/12/11

[#33680] [Backport87-Backport#4150][Open] Epic YAML Failure — David Richards <redmine@...>

Backport #4150: Epic YAML Failure

2 messages 2010/12/12

[#33682] [Backport87-Backport#4150] Epic YAML Failure — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2010/12/12

Issue #4150 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#33681] [Backport87-Backport#4150] Epic YAML Failure — David Richards <redmine@...>

Issue #4150 has been updated by David Richards.

1 message 2010/12/12

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12

[#33686] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/12

On 12 December 2010 12:13, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33714] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/12/14

2010/12/12 "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:

[#33777] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/20

Hello Akira,

[#33869] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/12/25

2010/12/20 "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:

[#33921] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/12/27

Hi!

[#33963] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/12/28

2010/12/27 Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@marc-andre.ca>:

[#33991] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2010/12/29

Hi!

[#35563] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...> 2011/03/27

Following the comments of Akira and others, here's a revised proposal

[#35564] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Michael Edgar <adgar@...> 2011/03/27

This looks astounding. Quick nit: is it #categorize or #associate? I like #categorize

[#33731] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2010/12/15

> pp ary.categorize {|e| [e[1], e[0]] }

[#33766] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/12/18

2010/12/16 Run Paint Run Run <runrun@runpaint.org>:

[#33685] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12

[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33696] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/13

[#33707] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/14

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33695] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/13

[#33700] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...> 2010/12/13

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>wrote:

[#33710] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/14

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@rubyforge.org> wrote:

[#33716] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...> 2010/12/14

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#33693] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/12/12

(2010/12/13 1:54), Haase, Konstantin wrote:

[#33694] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/13

[#33698] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2010/12/13

(2010/12/13 9:06), Ryan Davis wrote:

[#33699] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/13

[#33708] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/14

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#33709] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/14

On Dec 14, 2010, at 09:47 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33711] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/14

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Haase, Konstantin

[#33712] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/14

[#33713] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/14

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Haase, Konstantin

[#33715] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/14

On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:11 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33697] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/13

[#34921] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/01/28

Magnus Holm:

[#34941] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/01/28

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:54 PM, James M. Lawrence

[#34950] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "James M. Lawrence" <quixoticsycophant@...> 2011/01/28

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#33690] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153][Open] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Robert Pankowecki <redmine@...>

Bug #4153: Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code

6 messages 2010/12/12

[#33691] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Ryan Davis <redmine@...> 2010/12/12

Issue #4153 has been updated by Ryan Davis.

[#33692] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Ryan Davis <redmine@...> 2010/12/12

Issue #4153 has been updated by Ryan Davis.

[#33889] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4153 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33936] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/27

[#33937] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4153] Minitest or ruby bug - wrong return code — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/27

[#33701] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4155][Open] missing tags on official git mirror, example: v1_8_7_302 — Stephen Bannasch <redmine@...>

Bug #4155: missing tags on official git mirror, example: v1_8_7_302

2 messages 2010/12/13

[#33706] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4155][Assigned] missing tags on official git mirror, example: v1_8_7_302 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/12/14

Issue #4155 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#33703] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4156][Open] Use RUBY_VERSION instead of VERSION in e2mmap.rb — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>

Bug #4156: Use RUBY_VERSION instead of VERSION in e2mmap.rb

1 message 2010/12/13

[#33721] Suppressing "assigned but unused variable" — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I have stopped assigning many unused variables thanks to this new warning.

1 message 2010/12/15

[#33722] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4161][Open] ReXML wants "elements.each" argument to be not frozen — Pavel Shved <redmine@...>

Bug #4161: ReXML wants "elements.each" argument to be not frozen

1 message 2010/12/15

[#33724] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4162][Open] C segfault in TCPSocket CFUNC :read — Chris Lundquist <redmine@...>

Bug #4162: C segfault in TCPSocket CFUNC :read

2 messages 2010/12/15

[#33725] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4162] C segfault in TCPSocket CFUNC :read — Chris Lundquist <redmine@...> 2010/12/15

Issue #4162 has been updated by Chris Lundquist.

[#33735] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Assigned] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>

Bug #4163: RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit.

6 messages 2010/12/15

[#33746] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Assigned] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/16

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:46:33AM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#33743] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Assigned] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/16

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:46:33AM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#33744] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Assigned] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/12/16

Hi Aaron,

[#33745] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Assigned] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/16

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06:08AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#35061] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4163][Closed] RubyGems uses deprecated API: YAML.quick_emit. — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2011/02/03

Issue #4163 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#33737] broken and painfully slow tests — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

> TestPTY#test_getpty_nonexistent = C-c C-c

3 messages 2010/12/15

[#33738] Re: broken and painfully slow tests — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/12/15

2010/12/16 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:

[#33742] Re: broken and painfully slow tests — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2010/12/15

Hi,

[#33748] Proposal: IPAddress in the standard library — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2010/12/16

[#33758] Re: Proposal: IPAddress in the standard library — Simone Carletti <weppos@...> 2010/12/17

I'm really interested in this topic.

[#33759] Re: Proposal: IPAddress in the standard library — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/12/17

Hi,

[#33778] Re: Proposal: IPAddress in the standard library — Marco Ceresa <ceresa@...> 2010/12/20

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33760] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4167][Open] URI.encode encodes reserved character of # — "George M. Harkin" <redmine@...>

Bug #4167: URI.encode encodes reserved character of #

4 messages 2010/12/17

[#33768] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4167] URI.encode encodes reserved character of # — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/18

Issue #4167 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33761] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4167] URI.encode encodes reserved character of # — "George M. Harkin" <redmine@...> 2010/12/17

Issue #4167 has been updated by George M. Harkin.

[#33762] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4167] URI.encode encodes reserved character of # — "George M. Harkin" <redmine@...> 2010/12/17

Issue #4167 has been updated by George M. Harkin.

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33787] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2010/12/20

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...> 2011/01/05

Issue #4168 has been updated by Brian Durand.

[#34308] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...> 2011/01/10

Issue #4168 has been updated by Brian Durand.

[#34311] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/10

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34380] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34400] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/12

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34436] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/01/12

Hi,

[#34434] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...> 2011/01/12

Issue #4168 has been updated by Brian Durand.

[#34463] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/13

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34469] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...> 2011/01/13

Issue #4168 has been updated by Brian Durand.

[#34606] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/19

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34622] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/19

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34680] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/20

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34691] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/21

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34846] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/25

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34847] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/01/25

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Kurt Stephens <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34882] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/27

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34333] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34344] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34345] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34325] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34338] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34353] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/01/11

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Kurt Stephens <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34398] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/01/12

Hi,

[#34382] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/11

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34406] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/12

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34448] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/12

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34471] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...> 2011/01/13

Issue #4168 has been updated by Brian Durand.

[#34470] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/13

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34497] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/14

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34506] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/14

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34512] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/15

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34566] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/18

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34576] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/18

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34587] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/19

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34620] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/19

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34688] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/20

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34857] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2011/01/26

Issue #4168 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#34865] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/01/26

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Kurt Stephens <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34949] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/28

Issue #4168 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#33764] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...> 2010/12/17

Issue #4168 has been updated by Brian Durand.

[#36898] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2011/06/09

Hi,

[#33767] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4169][Open] Forked processes locked, won't exit — Ilya Grigorik <redmine@...>

Bug #4169: Forked processes locked, won't exit

5 messages 2010/12/18

[#33770] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4169][Assigned] Forked processes locked, won't exit — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/12/19

Issue #4169 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#33771] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4169] Forked processes locked, won't exit — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/12/19

Issue #4169 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#33781] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4169][Closed] Forked processes locked, won't exit — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/12/20

Issue #4169 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#33772] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4169] Forked processes locked, won't exit — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/12/19

Issue #4169 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#33769] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4170][Open] DRb doesn't accept hostnames started with digits — Ding Deng <redmine@...>

Bug #4170: DRb doesn't accept hostnames started with digits

1 message 2010/12/18

[#33774] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4172][Open] Named arguments/parameters support — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <redmine@...>

Feature #4172: Named arguments/parameters support

3 messages 2010/12/19

[#33776] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4172][Open] Named arguments/parameters support — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2010/12/20

Hi,

[#33784] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4172] Named arguments/parameters support — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <redmine@...> 2010/12/20

Issue #4172 has been updated by Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas.

[#33775] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4172] Named arguments/parameters support — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <redmine@...>

Issue #4172 has been updated by Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas.

1 message 2010/12/19

[#33779] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174][Open] 1F1E on rdoc tests — Kouhei Yanagita <redmine@...>

Bug #4174: 1F1E on rdoc tests

6 messages 2010/12/20

[#33790] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174][Open] 1F1E on rdoc tests — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/20

On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:57, Kouhei Yanagita <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33794] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174][Open] 1F1E on rdoc tests — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/12/21

2010/12/21 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:

[#33829] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174][Open] 1F1E on rdoc tests — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/23

[#33979] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174] 1F1E on rdoc tests — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4174 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#33978] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4174][Closed] 1F1E on rdoc tests — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4174 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#33783] [Ruby 1.8-Backport#4175][Open] OpenSSL::BN#prime? — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...>

Backport #4175: OpenSSL::BN#prime?

2 messages 2010/12/20

[#33785] [Ruby 1.8-Backport#4175][Closed] OpenSSL::BN#prime? raises TypeError — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/20

Issue #4175 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#33792] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4179][Open] OpenStruct#method_missing handles #[]= wrongly — Caius Durling <redmine@...>

Bug #4179: OpenStruct#method_missing handles #[]= wrongly

2 messages 2010/12/20

[#33793] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4179][Open] OpenStruct#method_missing handles #[]= wrongly — Caius Durling <caius@...> 2010/12/20

On 20 Dec 2010, at 23:43, Caius Durling wrote:

[#33796] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4181][Open] Backport Ruby 1.9 singleton.rb, since 1.8's is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #4181: Backport Ruby 1.9 singleton.rb, since 1.8's is not thread-safe

5 messages 2010/12/21

[#33816] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4181] Backport Ruby 1.9 singleton.rb, since 1.8's is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2010/12/22

Issue #4181 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34220] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4181] Backport Ruby 1.9 singleton.rb, since 1.8's is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/07

Issue #4181 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34255] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4181] Backport Ruby 1.9 singleton.rb, since 1.8's is not thread-safe — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/01/08

Issue #4181 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#34292] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4181] Backport Ruby 1.9 singleton.rb, since 1.8's is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/10

Issue #4181 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#33797] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4182][Open] Possible Ruby1.9.2/Sqlite3 bug when used with Rails 2.3.8 and TOG 0.6 — Alessandro Bottoni <redmine@...>

Bug #4182: Possible Ruby1.9.2/Sqlite3 bug when used with Rails 2.3.8 and TOG 0.6

3 messages 2010/12/21

[#33798] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4182] Possible Ruby1.9.2/Sqlite3 bug when used with Rails 2.3.8 and TOG 0.6 — Alessandro Bottoni <redmine@...> 2010/12/21

Issue #4182 has been updated by Alessandro Bottoni.

[#33823] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4182][Rejected] Possible Ruby1.9.2/Sqlite3 bug when used with Rails 2.3.8 and TOG 0.6 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/12/23

Issue #4182 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#33801] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Martin Bosslet <redmine@...>

Feature #4183: [ext/openssl] Timestamp support

8 messages 2010/12/21

[#33858] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/24

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 03:19:12AM +0900, Martin Bosslet wrote:

[#33862] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/25

Hi,

[#33875] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2010/12/25

Hi,

[#33881] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183][Open] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/25

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:58:56PM +0900, Hiroshi Nakamura wrote:

[#33906] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Martin Bosslet <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4183 has been updated by Martin Bosslet.

[#33909] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Martin Bosslet <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4183 has been updated by Martin Bosslet.

[#33998] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4183] [ext/openssl] Timestamp support — Martin Bosslet <redmine@...> 2010/12/29

Issue #4183 has been updated by Martin Bosslet.

[#33802] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4184][Open] String that has the same object_id in an each occurrence in a code — Pavel Rosputko <redmine@...>

Feature #4184: String that has the same object_id in an each occurrence in a code

5 messages 2010/12/21

[#33803] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4184][Open] String that has the same object_id in an each occurrence in a code — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/21

[#33809] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4184] String that has the same object_id in an each occurrence in a code — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/12/22

Issue #4184 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#33806] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4184] String that has the same object_id in an each occurrence in a code — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/12/22

Issue #4184 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#33810] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4184] String that has the same object_id in an each occurrence in a code — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/12/22

Issue #4184 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#33814] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4185][Open] ruby 1.9.2 p0 installation issue — ravish nayak <redmine@...>

Bug #4185: ruby 1.9.2 p0 installation issue

5 messages 2010/12/22

[#33822] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4185][Open] ruby 1.9.2 p0 installation issue — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/23

Hi,

[#33955] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4185] ruby 1.9.2 p0 installation issue — ravish nayak <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4185 has been updated by ravish nayak.

[#33830] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4185] ruby 1.9.2 p0 installation issue — ravish nayak <redmine@...> 2010/12/23

Issue #4185 has been updated by ravish nayak.

[#33832] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4185] ruby 1.9.2 p0 installation issue — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/23

Hi,

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33817] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2010/12/22

> As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

[#33821] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/23

Hi,

[#33843] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2010/12/23

> > As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

[#33965] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/28

Hi,

[#33974] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2010/12/28

> Why to stop the build instead of just giving a warning

[#33973] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/28

On 28 December 2010 20:25, Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33966] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/28

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33967] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/28

On 28 December 2010 20:39, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33993] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/29

Hi,

[#34008] Re: trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/30

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33818] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4188][Open] minitest warnings in 1.9.3 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #4188: minitest warnings in 1.9.3

4 messages 2010/12/23

[#33819] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4188][Open] minitest warnings in 1.9.3 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/23

[#33857] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4188][Open] minitest warnings in 1.9.3 — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/24

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:11:36AM +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:

[#33888] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4188][Closed] minitest warnings in 1.9.3 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4188 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33820] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4189][Open] FileUtils#ln_r — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>

Feature #4189: FileUtils#ln_r

1 message 2010/12/23

[#33825] PATCH: REE fast-thread.patch: stack_free() not called in rb_thread_die(). — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

http://code.google.com/p/rubyenterpriseedition/issues/detail?id=57

5 messages 2010/12/23

[#33828] Re: PATCH: REE fast-thread.patch: stack_free() not called in rb_thread_die(). — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/12/23

Similar technique might be relevant in MRI 1.9 if fiber/continuation

[#33836] Re: PATCH: REE fast-thread.patch: stack_free() not called in rb_thread_die(). — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/12/23

> Similar technique might be relevant in MRI 1.9 if fiber/continuation stacks

[#33838] Re: PATCH: REE fast-thread.patch: stack_free() not called in rb_thread_die(). — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/12/23

2010/12/23 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>:

[#33844] Re: PATCH: REE fast-thread.patch: stack_free() not called in rb_thread_die(). — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/12/23

On 12/23/10 8:03 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33834] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/23

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:

[#33835] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/12/23

2010/12/23 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#33837] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/23

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro

[#33839] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/23

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33848] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/23

Hi,

[#33849] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/23

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33855] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/24

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:

[#33859] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/25

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33865] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/25

[#33868] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2010/12/25

> Also, I've filed http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4200

[#33870] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/25

Thank you for the report.

[#33866] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/25

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:

[#33853] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/24

On 23 December 2010 13:47, Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:

[#33854] Re: Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/24

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33841] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4196][Open] Array#flatten!(0) should return nil — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

Bug #4196: Array#flatten!(0) should return nil

2 messages 2010/12/23

[#33842] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4196] Array#flatten!(0) should return nil — Hiro Asari <redmine@...> 2010/12/23

Issue #4196 has been updated by Hiro Asari.

[#33845] Getting involved in Ruby — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>

Hi dear Ruby core team !

9 messages 2010/12/23

[#33876] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/12/25

Hi,

[#33938] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/27

On 25 December 2010 18:44, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:

[#33883] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/26

Hi,

[#33884] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/26

Might be a bit of a sidestep from the original discussion, but:

[#33885] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/26

Hi Loren,

[#33886] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/26

[#33941] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/27

On 26 December 2010 01:52, Loren Segal <lsegal@soen.ca> wrote:

[#33940] Re: Getting involved in Ruby — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/12/27

On 26 December 2010 01:24, Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#34873] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/01/26

Issue #4197 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.

[#35025] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Closed] Improvement of the benchmark library — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/01/31

Issue #4197 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#35028] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Closed] Improvement of the benchmark library — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/02/01

Hi

[#35075] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Closed] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2011/02/03

Hi,

[#35083] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Closed] Improvement of the benchmark library — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/02/04

2011/2/4 Benoit Daloze <eregontp@gmail.com>:

[#35103] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/02/05

Issue #4197 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.

[#35105] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2011/02/06

Hi,

[#34858] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/01/26

Issue #4197 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#34848] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/01/25

Issue #4197 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.

[#34849] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2011/01/25

This eases review: https://github.com/eregon/ruby/compare/trunk...benchmark

[#35102] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2011/02/05

Issue #4197 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.

[#35119] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...> 2011/02/06

Issue #4197 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.

[#35120] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/02/06

> Hi,

[#35121] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...> 2011/02/06

Issue #4197 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.

[#33847] RDoc is now on github — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

If you would like to commit changes to rdoc, please ask for access to the github project. When you commit to the rdoc project it makes it easier for me to import new versions of rdoc to ruby's trunk.

1 message 2010/12/23

[#33850] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4009] Segfault with combination of threads and condition variables — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <redmine@...>

Issue #4009 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.

1 message 2010/12/24

[#33851] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4198][Open] parse error involving spaceship operator — B Kelly <redmine@...>

Bug #4198: parse error involving spaceship operator

1 message 2010/12/24

[#33852] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4199][Open] make test ruby-1.9.2-p0 failed on Solaris10 x86 — Dmitry Perfilyev <redmine@...>

Bug #4199: make test ruby-1.9.2-p0 failed on Solaris10 x86

3 messages 2010/12/24

[#33871] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4199] make test ruby-1.9.2-p0 failed on Solaris10 x86 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/25

Issue #4199 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33873] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4199] make test ruby-1.9.2-p0 failed on Solaris10 x86 — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/25

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Yui NARUSE <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#33864] [Backport92-Backport#4200][Open] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>

Backport #4200: minitest 2.0.2 on trunk

6 messages 2010/12/25

[#34078] [Backport92-Backport#4200] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Ryan Davis <redmine@...> 2011/01/05

Issue #4200 has been updated by Ryan Davis.

[#34086] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4200] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Yugui <yugui@...> 2011/01/05

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ryan Davis <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34092] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4200] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/01/05

[#34903] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4200] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Yugui <yugui@...> 2011/01/27

Hi Ryan,

[#34906] [Backport92-Backport#4200] minitest 2.0.2 on trunk — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2011/01/27

Issue #4200 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#33867] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4202][Assigned] RDoc raises exception on non-HOME envrionemt — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Bug #4202: RDoc raises exception on non-HOME envrionemt

2 messages 2010/12/25

[#33887] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4202][Closed] RDoc raises exception on non-HOME envrionemt — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4202 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#33872] Bug in Webrick httprequest.rb using multiple proxies and fix — Kasper Johansen <k@...>

Hi.

2 messages 2010/12/25

[#37340] Re: Bug in Webrick httprequest.rb using multiple proxies and fix — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...> 2011/06/24

Hi,

[#33874] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4203][Open] broken RegCreateKeyExA definition in registry.rb — Rafał Michalski <redmine@...>

Bug #4203: broken RegCreateKeyExA definition in registry.rb

3 messages 2010/12/25

[#33878] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4203][Closed] broken RegCreateKeyExA definition in registry.rb — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/12/25

Issue #4203 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#33877] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4203] broken RegCreateKeyExA definition in registry.rb — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/12/25

Issue #4203 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#33879] [Backport92-Backport#4205][Open] broken RegCreateKeyExA definition in registry.rb — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Backport #4205: broken RegCreateKeyExA definition in registry.rb

1 message 2010/12/25

[#33880] As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>

Hello,

8 messages 2010/12/25

[#33916] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2010/12/27

Hello,

[#33918] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/27

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:50 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#33986] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/29

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33988] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/29

Luis,

[#33994] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/29

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:

[#34006] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/30

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#34025] Re: As platform mantainer - what are my boundaries? — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/01/01

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:42:03PM +0900, Yugui wrote:

[#33882] Significant update to the Matrix library — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>

Hello and Merry Xmas!

2 messages 2010/12/25

[#33926] Re: Significant update to the Matrix library — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...> 2010/12/27

I haven't looked at the substance of the proposal yet but:

[#33902] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4208][Open] ENV.delete warns even if it succeeded on Windows. — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #4208: ENV.delete warns even if it succeeded on Windows.

2 messages 2010/12/26

[#33905] [Backport92-Backport#4208][Assigned] ENV.delete warns even if it succeeded on Windows. — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/26

Issue #4208 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33903] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#3992] irb's "help" command errs in 1.9.x — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Issue #3992 has been updated by Heesob Park.

1 message 2010/12/26

[#33904] Several bug fixes are not merged into Ruby-1.9.2p136 — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2010/12/26

[#34088] Re: Several bug fixes are not merged into Ruby-1.9.2p136 — Yugui <yugui@...> 2011/01/05

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Heesob Park <phasis@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33907] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4210][Open] id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace — Vincent Bray <redmine@...>

Bug #4210: id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace

6 messages 2010/12/26

[#33915] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4210] id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4210 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33962] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4210] id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace — Vincent Bray <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4210 has been updated by Vincent Bray.

[#34205] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4210] id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace — Mitchell Hashimoto <redmine@...> 2011/01/07

Issue #4210 has been updated by Mitchell Hashimoto.

[#34212] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4210] id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace — Vincent Bray <redmine@...> 2011/01/07

Issue #4210 has been updated by Vincent Bray.

[#34213] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4210][Rejected] id rather than object_id used in 1.9 rdoc for ObjectSpace — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2011/01/07

Issue #4210 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33939] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/27

On Dec 26, 2010, at 13:00, Loren Segal wrote:

[#33949] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/28

[#33982] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/29

On Dec 27, 2010, at 19:03, Loren Segal wrote:

[#34005] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/30

[#33920] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4211 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33946] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/28

[#33934] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/27

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:01:00PM +0900, Yui NARUSE wrote:

[#33935] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/27

[#33943] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/27

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 05:52:13AM +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:

[#33912] [Ruby 1.8-Backport#4212][Open] Option :ftp_active_mode on open-uri not merged with current distribution of ruby-1.8.7 — Rui Andrada <redmine@...>

Backport #4212: Option :ftp_active_mode on open-uri not merged with current distribution of ruby-1.8.7

2 messages 2010/12/26

[#33913] [Ruby 1.8-Backport#4212][Rejected] Option :ftp_active_mode on open-uri not merged with current distribution of ruby-1.8.7 — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4212 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[#33924] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4214 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#33928] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/27

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:06:00AM +0900, Luis Lavena wrote:

[#33925] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4214 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#33942] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/12/27

Hi,

[#33945] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/27

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 07:49:07AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#33959] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4214 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#33961] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4214 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#33968] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/28

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:03:48AM +0900, Luis Lavena wrote:

[#33969] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2010/12/28

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Aaron Patterson

[#33970] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4214 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#33971] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/28

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 05:09:34AM +0900, Jon Forums wrote:

[#33977] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4214 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#33930] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Closed] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4214 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#33932] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2010/12/27

Issue #4214 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#33929] [Ruby 1.9-Backport#4215][Open] Please backport r30407 to the 1.9.2 branch — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Backport #4215: Please backport r30407 to the 1.9.2 branch

3 messages 2010/12/27

[#33984] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Backport#4215][Open] Please backport r30407 to the 1.9.2 branch — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/29

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Aaron Patterson <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#35049] [Backport92-Backport#4215] Please backport r30407 to the 1.9.2 branch — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2011/02/02

Issue #4215 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#33931] [Backport92-Backport#4216][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Backport #4216: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

3 messages 2010/12/27

[#33933] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4216][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2010/12/27

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:49:09AM +0900, Luis Lavena wrote:

[#35050] [Backport92-Backport#4216] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2011/02/02

Issue #4216 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.

[#33948] Multi-line comments — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

I was always curious about the reasoning Ruby doesn't support

13 messages 2010/12/28

[#33950] Re: Multi-line comments — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...> 2010/12/28

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com

[#33956] Re: Multi-line comments — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2010/12/28

On 28-12-2010 01:54, Joshua Ballanco wrote:

[#33957] Re: Multi-line comments — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/28

[#33958] Re: Multi-line comments — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2010/12/28

Em 28-12-2010 08:56, Loren Segal escreveu:

[#33975] Re: Multi-line comments — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/28

[#33976] Re: Multi-line comments — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2010/12/28

On Dec 28, 2010, at 13:16, Loren Segal wrote:

[#33980] Re: Multi-line comments — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/28

[#33981] Re: Multi-line comments — Loren Segal <lsegal@...> 2010/12/28

[#33990] Re: Multi-line comments — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2010/12/29

On 28-12-2010 19:16, Loren Segal wrote:

[#33952] Re: Multi-line comments — deepak kannan <kannan.deepak@...> 2010/12/28

hi,

[#34018] Re: Multi-line comments — mathew <meta@...> 2010/12/31

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 19:55, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas

[#34026] Re: Multi-line comments — deepak kannan <kannan.deepak@...> 2011/01/02

+1 nicely said

[#33951] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217][Open] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #4217: irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows

6 messages 2010/12/28

[#33954] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217][Closed] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/12/28

Issue #4217 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#33983] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2010/12/29

Issue #4217 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#34027] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/01/03

Hello,

[#34028] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2011/01/03

Hi,

[#34029] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4217] irb exits unexpectedly with non-ascii Regexp on Windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/01/03

Hello,

[#33953] my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — deepak kannan <kannan.deepak@...>

hi,

6 messages 2010/12/28

[#33992] Re: my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — Deepak Kannan <kannan.deepak@...> 2010/12/29

hi,

[#33995] Re: my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2010/12/29

Deepak Kannan wrote in post #971036:

[#33996] Re: my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2010/12/29

Update: I now got the "activation" mail and can now log in.

[#33997] Re: my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2010/12/29

Your id is "deepak".

[#34007] Re: my redmine login is not working and wanted to submit a bug — deepak kannan <kannan.deepak@...> 2010/12/30

hi,

[#33964] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4220][Open] Non-descriptive error when failing to load compiled library — "George M. Harkin" <redmine@...>

Bug #4220: Non-descriptive error when failing to load compiled library

1 message 2010/12/28

[#33985] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4221][Open] Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #4221: Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk

4 messages 2010/12/29

[#34001] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4221] Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk — Peter Weldon <redmine@...> 2010/12/29

Issue #4221 has been updated by Peter Weldon.

[#34000] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4221] Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk — Peter Weldon <redmine@...> 2010/12/29

Issue #4221 has been updated by Peter Weldon.

[#34009] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4221][Closed] Unexpected result of Time#strftime("%s") on Windows with trunk — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/30

Issue #4221 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#33987] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4222][Open] Irb tab completion support for the valid (but rare) obj::method invocation syntax — "Abinoam P. Marques Jr." <redmine@...>

Feature #4222: Irb tab completion support for the valid (but rare) obj::method invocation syntax

2 messages 2010/12/29

[#33989] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4222][Open] Irb tab completion support for the valid (but rare) obj::method invocation syntax — Yugui <yugui@...> 2010/12/29

Thank you, Abinoam.

[#33999] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4224][Open] inconsistent behavior of 'puts "\xFF"' — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Feature #4224: inconsistent behavior of 'puts "\xFF"'

4 messages 2010/12/29

[#34019] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4224][Assigned] inconsistent behavior of 'puts "\xFF"' — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/31

Issue #4224 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#34021] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4224][Closed] inconsistent behavior of 'puts "\xFF"' — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/31

Issue #4224 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#34020] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4224] inconsistent behavior of 'puts "\xFF"' — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2010/12/31

Issue #4224 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#34004] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4225][Open] IO.foreach should only accept string arguments — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

Bug #4225: IO.foreach should only accept string arguments

1 message 2010/12/30

[#34010] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4227][Open] Webrick tests use deprecated :RequestHandler option — Peter Weldon <redmine@...>

Bug #4227: Webrick tests use deprecated :RequestHandler option

2 messages 2010/12/30

[#34396] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4227][Closed] Webrick tests use deprecated :RequestHandler option — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2011/01/12

Issue #4227 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#34011] [Backport92-Backport#4228][Open] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Backport #4228: Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems

6 messages 2010/12/30

[#34015] [Backport92-Backport#4228] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Ryan Davis <redmine@...> 2010/12/31

Issue #4228 has been updated by Ryan Davis.

[#34016] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4228] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2010/12/31

[#34523] [Backport92-Backport#4228][Closed] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2011/01/16

Issue #4228 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#34522] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4228][Open] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Yugui <yugui@...> 2011/01/16

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Luis Lavena <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34524] Re: [Backport92-Backport#4228][Open] Backward gemspec compatibility change in r29663 broke rake gems — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/01/16

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:

[#34014] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#4229][Open] Thread#raise 3rd form arguments ignored — Daniel Berger <redmine@...>

Bug #4229: Thread#raise 3rd form arguments ignored

1 message 2010/12/31

[#34022] [ANN] rubygems 1.4.0 Released — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

rubygems version 1.4.0 has been released!

2 messages 2010/12/31

[#34024] Re: [ANN] rubygems 1.4.0 Released — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/01/01

aaaaaaand another release...

[#34023] ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Is there a reason why ruby -h doesn't show --disable-gems ?

8 messages 2010/12/31

[#34037] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2011/01/04

[#34047] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/01/04

2011/1/4 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:

[#34055] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2011/01/04

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:14 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro

[#34057] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/01/04

2011/1/4 Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>:

[#34058] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/01/04

Hello,

[#34059] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — Xavier Noria <fxn@...> 2011/01/04

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:48 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:

[#34060] Re: ruby -h doesn't include --disable-gems — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/01/04