[#33640] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4136][Open] Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables — Hiro Asari <redmine@...>

Bug #4136: Enumerable#reject should not inherit the receiver's instance variables

10 messages 2010/12/08

[#33667] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4149][Open] Documentation submission: syslog standard library — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4149: Documentation submission: syslog standard library

11 messages 2010/12/10

[#33683] [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

Hi.

14 messages 2010/12/12
[#33684] Re: [feature:trunk] Enumerable#categorize — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2010/12/12

[#33687] Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>

Hey folks,

23 messages 2010/12/12
[#33688] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2010/12/12

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#33689] Re: Towards a standardized AST for Ruby code — "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...> 2010/12/12

On Dec 12, 2010, at 17:46 , Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#33763] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4168][Open] WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9 — Brian Durand <redmine@...>

Bug #4168: WeakRef is unsafe to use in Ruby 1.9

43 messages 2010/12/17

[#33815] trunk warnflags build issue with curb 0.7.9? — Jon <jon.forums@...>

As this may turn out to be a 3rd party issue rather than a bug, I'd like some feedback.

11 messages 2010/12/22

[#33833] Ruby 1.9.2 is going to be released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33846] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4197][Open] Improvement of the benchmark library — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>

Feature #4197: Improvement of the benchmark library

15 messages 2010/12/23

[#33910] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4211][Open] Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax — Loren Segal <redmine@...>

Feature #4211: Converting the Ruby and C API documentation to YARD syntax

10 messages 2010/12/26

[#33923] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4214][Open] Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows — Jon Forums <redmine@...>

Bug #4214: Fiddle::WINDOWS == false on Windows

15 messages 2010/12/27

[ruby-core:33799] Re: Planning to release 1.8.7 fixes on 12/25 (Japanese timezone)

From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2010-12-21 16:22:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #33799
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 17:19, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> (2010/11/28 5:55), Luis Lavena wrote:
>> 1) I was unable to run tests (make check) for it:
>
> This is because you are using a source from a git repo. t doesn't happen on
> our canonical svn code.

It happens for me, using the canonical SVN repo.

$ make check
test succeeded
./miniruby -I./lib -I.ext/common -I./- -r./ext/purelib.rb
./runruby.rb --extout=.ext  -- "./test/runner.rb" --basedir="./test"
--runner=console
/home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/logger.rb:174: private method `chomp'
called for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
	from ./test/logger/test_logger.rb:2:in `require'
	from ./test/logger/test_logger.rb:2
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:90:in `require'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:90:in `collect_file'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:73:in
`recursive_collect'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:58:in `each'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:58:in
`recursive_collect'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:63:in
`recursive_collect'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:58:in `each'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:58:in
`recursive_collect'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:29:in `collect'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:68
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:213:in `[]'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:213:in `run'
	from /home/meta/WIP/ruby187/lib/test/unit/autorunner.rb:12:in `run'
	from ./test/runner.rb:7
make: *** [test-all] Error 1


mathew

In This Thread