[#303658] Remove Parts of a String — Dan __ <major_general_joe@...>

Alright, this is probably a really simple question to answer, but I just

15 messages 2008/06/01

[#303876] deleting first line from a file — suresh <suresh.amritapuri@...>

Hi

16 messages 2008/06/03

[#303934] Module philosophy — "Leslie Viljoen" <leslieviljoen@...>

Sorry to beat a dead horse, but to confirm: the only way to mix a

12 messages 2008/06/04

[#303941] A complete guide for Ruby Progammers — Mc Mohd <mcmohd@...>

This tutorial gives you complete knowledge starting from basic to

23 messages 2008/06/04
[#303943] Re: A complete guide for Ruby Progammers — Davi Vidal <davividal@...> 2008/06/04

Em Wednesday 04 June 2008, Mc Mohd escreveu:

[#303945] Re: A complete guide for Ruby Progammers — Mc Mohd <mcmohd@...> 2008/06/04

Sorry pal missed to send URL. Its here:

[#303947] Re: A complete guide for Ruby Progammers — "Oscar Del Ben" <thehcdreamer@...> 2008/06/04

Thanks for your work ;)

[#303948] Re: A complete guide for Ruby Progammers — "Leslie Viljoen" <leslieviljoen@...> 2008/06/04

This tutorial looks strangely familiar!

[#303957] A crosspost from the Perl Community — Star Cross <starx@...>

All,

55 messages 2008/06/04
[#303983] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — David Masover <ninja@...> 2008/06/04

On Wednesday 04 June 2008 12:20:37 Star Cross wrote:

[#304212] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — Jenda Krynicky <jenda@...> 2008/06/06

David Masover wrote:

[#304303] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — David Masover <ninja@...> 2008/06/07

On Friday 06 June 2008 12:02:19 Jenda Krynicky wrote:

[#305043] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — Jenda Krynicky <jenda@...> 2008/06/13

David Masover wrote:

[#304075] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — Dave Bass <davebass@...> 2008/06/05

Coming to Ruby recently from Perl, these are my comments.

[#304084] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/06/05

On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Dave Bass <davebass@musician.org> wrote:

[#304175] Re: A crosspost from the Perl Community — Dave Bass <davebass@...> 2008/06/06

Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#304217] Preferable Pairs (#165) — "Matthew Moss" <matthew.moss@...>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

17 messages 2008/06/06

[#304230] Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — "Israel Guerra" <israel.guerra@...>

Hail everyone!

60 messages 2008/06/06
[#304237] Re: Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/06/06

Israel Guerra wrote:

[#304241] Re: Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — James Britt <james.britt@...> 2008/06/06

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#304242] Re: Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — "Israel Guerra" <israel.guerra@...> 2008/06/06

But guys, maybe im wrong about jruby, but its a ruby interpreter running in

[#304271] Re: Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — "Victor Reyes" <victor.reyes@...> 2008/06/07

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <

[#304240] Re: Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — James Britt <james.britt@...> 2008/06/06

Israel Guerra wrote:

[#304309] Re: Desktop multi-plataform ruby app — Tom Cloyd <tomcloyd@...> 2008/06/07

James Britt wrote:

[#304284] using portions of other methods in a new method — Jason Lillywhite <jason.lillywhite@...>

How do you take a piece of a method and use it in another? Here is my

10 messages 2008/06/07

[#304353] Ruby wishlist — jzakiya <jzakiya@...>

You can do this:

23 messages 2008/06/08

[#304443] my first program just shuttin' down — Ruby Noob <john_@...>

Why? I tryin' to open the "hello.rb" program, but it just shuttin' down

12 messages 2008/06/08

[#304541] Ruby vs JRuby Performance — "Victor Reyes" <victor.reyes@...>

I knew that there was a penalty to be paid when running JRuby, but I did not

20 messages 2008/06/09

[#304623] Random Number Stuff — David Stanislaus <stanislaus_d@...>

How would you create a random number generator thats limited to a

17 messages 2008/06/10

[#304640] accessing class variables from the outside (beginner question) — progcat@...

I am still learning Ruby and I am trying to get something

12 messages 2008/06/10

[#304662] webby, ubuntu and gems — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...>

I've recently switched distributions to ubuntu, and I'm having

15 messages 2008/06/10

[#304728] Basic Tree Data Structure — Justin To <tekmc@...>

class Tree

14 messages 2008/06/10
[#304738] Re: Basic Tree Data Structure — Justin To <tekmc@...> 2008/06/10

class Tree

[#304790] Trie data structure — Justin To <tekmc@...>

I'm trying to implement a trie data structure for my parsing program

17 messages 2008/06/10
[#304826] Re: Trie data structure — Dave Bass <davebass@...> 2008/06/11

Justin To wrote:

[#304825] each with else — Thorsten Mler <thorsten@80beans.com>

Hi all,

11 messages 2008/06/11

[#304875] write byte array to file — "Rajesh Olafson" <rolafson@...>

Helo

16 messages 2008/06/11

[#304960] Help with Ruby under cygwin — James Byrne <byrnejb@...>

In order to use git on my laptop (MS XPproSP3) I ended up installing the

23 messages 2008/06/12

[#304992] a simple patch for the ri utility — Daniel Choi <dhchoi@...>

Hi everyone

15 messages 2008/06/12

[#305021] array to string conversion — Clement Ow <clement.ow@...>

Hi, I have 2 arrays(which is part of the hash):

13 messages 2008/06/13

[#305058] Circle Drawing (#166) — "Matthew Moss" <matthew.moss@...>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

19 messages 2008/06/13

[#305100] Documenting Networking in Ruby. Any volunteer — "Victor Reyes" <victor.reyes@...>

Team,

10 messages 2008/06/13

[#305104] raise and rescue — Misiek Sz <nicpon@...>

Is is possible to raise an exception then rescue it and then go back to

13 messages 2008/06/13

[#305160] What was YOUR first Ruby Project — Eric Hegwer <ehegwer@...>

I though it be cool to hear what your first experience with Ruby was.

26 messages 2008/06/14

[#305227] why can't an instance instantiated within a class method access a protected instance method? — "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.ruby@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2008/06/15
[#305228] Re: why can't an instance instantiated within a class method access a protected instance method? — "Greg Hauptmann" <greg.hauptmann.ruby@...> 2008/06/15

(complete email)Hi,

[#305230] How !isset in Ruby — Alexey Tafintsev <alexey@...>

Hello people!

21 messages 2008/06/15
[#305238] Re: How !isset in Ruby — Martin Boese <boesemar@...> 2008/06/15

[#305241] Re: How !isset in Ruby — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2008/06/15

On 15.06.2008 14:37, Martin Boese wrote:

[#305268] little problem (google hiring puzzle) — ex <exeQtor@...>

Hi guys, I wonder if someone can find a pure ruby solution instead of

43 messages 2008/06/15

[#305334] How to Authenticate against the Windows NT Domain via Ruby — ChessMess <chessmess@...>

We are running a Rails application on Linux RedHat with a requirement

12 messages 2008/06/16

[#305377] print(true and true) #=> the parenthesis issue — hakunin <madfancier@...>

The parenthesis have been discussed before, but maybe this is another

31 messages 2008/06/17

[#305398] Can I find out the memory used by an object? — "Robert Hulme" <robert.hulme@...>

I'm 99% sure the answer to that question is no, but I thought I'd ask anyway :-)

15 messages 2008/06/17

[#305446] parsing text into usablle numerical data — Cthulhu __ <weedmasterp@...>

Hey total ruby n00b here...

13 messages 2008/06/17

[#305467] quick question about how array objects are handled — Chance Dinkins <chanceusc@...>

Btw, thanks in advance for any help - this community seems great!

11 messages 2008/06/17

[#305557] Rather validate values or use exceptions? — Joshua Muheim <forum@...>

Hi all

12 messages 2008/06/18

[#305605] Presentation on Ruby, require suggestions — "Srijayanth Sridhar" <srijayanth@...>

Hello,

14 messages 2008/06/19

[#305635] Why metaclasses? — "James Coglan" <jcoglan@...>

Hello all,

15 messages 2008/06/19

[#305727] Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi all.

91 messages 2008/06/20
[#305893] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/23

All versions of MRI Ruby that claim to fix the vulnerabilities are

[#305934] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Hongli Lai <hongli@...> 2008/06/23

Hi guys. Igal invited me to join this discussion.

[#305936] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/23

Hongli Lai wrote:

[#305943] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Hongli Lai <hongli@...> 2008/06/23

Igal Koshevoy wrote:

[#305956] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/23

Hongli Lai wrote:

[#306045] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/24

We have another potential winning solution!

[#306072] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Robert Thau <rst@...> 2008/06/24

Igal Koshevoy wrote:

[#306135] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/24

Robert Thau wrote:

[#306137] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Dominic Sisneros" <dsisnero@...> 2008/06/25

Maybe you should try posting a issue on the new redmine bug tracker

[#306139] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/06/25

Dominic Sisneros wrote:

[#306214] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Jason Crystal <jcrystal@...> 2008/06/25

Just wanted to say that we all appreciate those fixes you guys have been

[#306516] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Cheri Anaclerio <canaclerio@...> 2008/06/29

Could somebody please explain how to apply the Smartleaf Stanislav and

[#307002] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — Doug Alcorn <dougalcorn@...> 2008/07/02

Igal Koshevoy wrote:

[#305751] Regular expressions and long text — Guillermo.Acilu@...

Hello guys,

15 messages 2008/06/20

[#305810] Where does ruby excel? — Dolazy <francis.rammeloo@...>

I have only used ruby for writing little scripts. Things that are

14 messages 2008/06/21

[#305844] Initial release of amalgalite - v0.1.0 — Jeremy Hinegardner <jeremy@...>

Amalgalite embeds the SQLite database engine in a ruby extension.

13 messages 2008/06/21

[#305854] KABLAME! 0.2.1 Released — "Jacob Dunphy" <jacob.dunphy@...>

This is the first "announced release" of KABLAME!

13 messages 2008/06/22

[#305855] RubyGems 1.2.0 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

= Announce: RubyGems Release 1.2.0

49 messages 2008/06/22

[#305882] Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>

Hi, I use Logger class in a programm and since I need to log in lot of=20

49 messages 2008/06/22
[#305884] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Suraj Kurapati <snk@...> 2008/06/22

I単aki Baz Castillo wrote:

[#305885] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2008/06/22

El Lunes, 23 de Junio de 2008, Suraj Kurapati escribi=C3=B3:

[#305886] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Suraj Kurapati <snk@...> 2008/06/23

I単aki Baz Castillo wrote:

[#305888] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2008/06/23

El Lunes, 23 de Junio de 2008, Suraj Kurapati escribi=C3=B3:

[#306058] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Andrea Fazzi <andrea.fazzi@...> 2008/06/24

I単aki Baz Castillo ha scritto:

[#306066] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2008/06/24

El Martes, 24 de Junio de 2008, Andrea Fazzi escribi=C3=B3:

[#306161] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "Robert Klemme" <shortcutter@...> 2008/06/25

2008/6/24 I=F1aki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>:

[#306168] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/06/25

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Robert Klemme

[#306176] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Andrea Fazzi <andrea.fazzi@...> 2008/06/25

Robert Dober ha scritto:

[#306180] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/06/25

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Andrea Fazzi <andrea.fazzi@alca.le.it> wro=

[#306288] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/06/26

I=C3=B1aki Baz Castillo:

[#306351] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2008/06/26

El Jueves, 26 de Junio de 2008, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) escribi=C3=B3:

[#306387] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/06/27

I=C3=B1aki Baz Castillo:

[#306416] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...> 2008/06/27

El Viernes, 27 de Junio de 2008, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) escribi=C3=B3:

[#306499] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/06/28

I=C3=B1aki Baz Castillo:

[#306501] Re: Is it ellegant to use a global variable to store a Logger object? — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/06/28

[#306085] Sequel primary keys — "Glen Holcomb" <damnbigman@...>

I posted to the Sequel Google Group but it's horribly slow, assuming it took

16 messages 2008/06/24

[#306088] Performance improvement possible? — Philip Rhoades <phil@...>

People,

35 messages 2008/06/24
[#306095] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Rob Biedenharn <Rob@...> 2008/06/24

On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:

[#306225] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Philip Rhoades <phil@...> 2008/06/25

Rob,

[#306237] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2008/06/26

[#306243] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Philip Rhoades <phil@...> 2008/06/26

Chuck,

[#306255] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Rob Biedenharn <Rob@...> 2008/06/26

On Jun 25, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:

[#306333] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2008/06/26

On 26 Jun 2008, at 04:24, Rob Biedenharn wrote:

[#306345] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Philip Rhoades <phil@...> 2008/06/26

Eleanor,

[#306350] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2008/06/26

On 26 Jun 2008, at 20:47, Philip Rhoades wrote:

[#306357] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Philip Rhoades <phil@...> 2008/06/26

Ellie,

[#306368] Re: Performance improvement possible? — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2008/06/27

On 26 Jun 2008, at 22:51, Philip Rhoades wrote:

[#306234] A cleaner way to pass a block or proc — "Tristin Davis" <tristin.colby@...>

Is there a cleaner way to implement my add_notifier method?

15 messages 2008/06/25
[#306236] Re: A cleaner way to pass a block or proc — Ben Bleything <ben@...> 2008/06/26

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008, Tristin Davis wrote:

[#306245] Re: A cleaner way to pass a block or proc — "Tristin Davis" <tristin.colby@...> 2008/06/26

Thanks Ben. That worked perfect. No other changes required in the class. :)

[#306331] question about defined? and y — Ruby Freak <twscannell@...>

The defined? keyword seems to have some funky behaviors.

19 messages 2008/06/26

[#306420] Statistician I (#167) — "Matthew Moss" <matthew.moss@...>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

13 messages 2008/06/27

[#306448] changing the shebang of ruby files best way ? — unbewusst.sein@... (Une B騅ue)

I've a lot of ruby files (grabed from net) having a wrong shebang for my

18 messages 2008/06/27
[#306505] Re: changing the shebang of ruby files best way ? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/06/28

[#306524] Random Generation of Characters — Tj Superfly <nonstickglue@...>

How could you generate a list of all possible combination's of lowercase

12 messages 2008/06/29

[#306533] mysterious memory corruption, very confused — Seebs <usenet-nospam@...>

ruby 1.8.7-p22, OS X 10.4.mumble, PostgreSQL 8.3.1, ruby-pg 2008-03-18.

11 messages 2008/06/29

[#306547] Recursive Logic - Examples and Resources? — Dan __ <major_general_joe@...>

Hey all,

13 messages 2008/06/29

[#306620] Threads and Ruby — barjunk <barjunk@...>

I've been hunting around for information regarding threads, and to me,

35 messages 2008/06/30
[#306621] Re: Threads and Ruby — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/06/30

[#306701] nested methods good or bad design — John Maclean <jayeola@...>

=begin

15 messages 2008/06/30

[#306728] how to - quickly make permutations? — Max Williams <toastkid.williams@...>

can anyone provide an elegant implementation for this method?

18 messages 2008/06/30
[#306761] Re: how to - quickly make permutations? — Frederick Cheung <frederick.cheung@...> 2008/06/30

[#306778] Re: how to - quickly make permutations? — "jim finucane" <jimrails@...> 2008/07/01

each new element tries to double the size of the list

ANN: Sequel 2.1.0 Released

From: Jeremy Evans <code@...>
Date: 2008-06-17 17:20:22 UTC
List: ruby-talk #305444
Sequel is a lightweight database access toolkit for Ruby.

* Sequel provides thread safety, connection pooling and a concise DSL
  for constructing database queries and table schemas.
* Sequel also includes a lightweight but comprehensive ORM layer for
  mapping records to Ruby objects and handling associated records.
* Sequel makes it easy to deal with multiple records without having
  to break your teeth on SQL.
* Sequel currently has adapters for ADO, DB2, DBI, Informix, JDBC,
  MySQL, ODBC, OpenBase, Oracle, PostgreSQL and SQLite3.

Sequel 2.1.0 has been released and should be available on the gem
mirrors.  2.1.0 has the following exciting new features:

Model Improvements
------------------

* one_to_many/many_to_many associations now support a :limit option,
  adding a limit/offset to the records returned.  This was possible
  before using a block, so it is just added for convenience.

* Associations now support a :read_only option, which doesn't create
  methods that modify the database.

* Associations now support a :graph_select option, which allows
  specifying the columns of associated models to include when using
  eager_graph.

* one_to_many associations now have a :one_to_one option.  When used
  it creates a getter and setter method similar to many_to_one.  This
  fills the same role as ActiveRecord's has_one, but it is
  implemented as a couple of convenience methods over one_to_many, so
  it still requires that you specify the association name as a
  plural.

* Model datasets now have to_hash augmented so that it can be called
  without any arguments, in which case it yields an identity map (a
  hash with keys being primary key values and values being model
  instances).

* The Model.set_sti_key method was added, for easily setting up
  single table inheritance.  It should be called only in the parent
  class.

* Calls to def_dataset_method with a block are now cached and
  reapplied to the new dataset if set_dataset is called afterward,
  or in a subclass.

* All validation methods can now be made conditional via an :if
  option, which takes either a symbol (which specifies an instance
  method) or a proc (which is instance_evaled).

* Model#set and Model#update have been added back, they are now
  aliases of #set_with_params and #update_with_params.

* Models now have set_only/set_except/update_only/update_except
  instance methods that take a hash (like you would provide to
  set or update) and additional arguments specifying which columns
  to allow or disallow.

* Models now have a set_allowed_columns and set_restricted_columns
  methods, which operate similarly to ActiveRecord's attr_accessible
  and attr_protected.  It is recommend that you use the set_only or
  update_only instead of these methods, though.  You can ignore the
  allowed or restricted columns by using #set_all or #update_all.

* The primary key column(s) is restricted by default. To allow it to
  be set via new/set/update, use:

    Sequel::Model.unrestrict_primary_key # Global
    Artist.unrestrict_primary_key # Per Class

* It is now easy to override the one_to_many/many_to_many association
  methods that modify the database (add_/remove_/remove_all_), as
  they have been broken into two methods, one that handles the
  caching features and a private one (prepended with an _) that
  handles the database changes (and which you can easily override
  without worrying about the caching).

Table Joining
-------------

Dataset#join_table got a nice overhaul.  You can now use any join
type your database allows:

  DB[:artist].join_table(:natural, :albums)
  DB[:numbers].join_table(:cross, :numbers)

You can now specify the conditions as

* String: "a.b = c.d" # ON a.b = c.d
* Expression :x < :y # ON x < y
* Array of Symbols: [:x, :y, :z] # USING (x, y, z)
* nil # no conditions, used for NATURAL or CROSS joins

Dataset#join_table also takes a block that yields three arguments:

* join_table_alias - The alias/name of the table currently being
  joined
* last_join_table_alias - The alias name of the last table joined
  (if there was one) or the first FROM table (if not).
* joins - An array of JoinClause objects for all previous joins in
  the query.

Using the block you can specify conditions for complex joins without
needing to know in advance what table aliases will be used.

Expanded SQL Syntax Support
---------------------------

SQL Case statements are now supported directly using hashes or
arrays:

  {:x > 1 => 1}.case(0)
  # CASE WHEN x > 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
  [[{:x=>1}, 0], [:x < 1, 1], [:x > 1, 2]].case(-1)
  # CASE WHEN x = 1 THEN 0 WHEN x < 1 THEN 1 WHEN x > 1 THEN 2
    ELSE -1 END

You should use an array instead of a hash for multiple conditions
unless all conditions are orthogonal.

The SQL extract function has special syntax:

  EXTRACT(day FROM date)

This syntax is now supported via the following ruby code:

  :date.extract(:day)

Other Notable Changes
---------------------

* The sequel command line tool can now run migrations.  The -m
  option specifies the directory holding the migration files,
  and the -M options specifies the version to which to migrate.

* The PostgreSQL adapter supports nested transactions/savepoints.

* The schema parser now understands decimal fields, and will
  typecast to BigDecimal.

* PostgreSQL's numeric type is now recognized and returned as
  BigDecimal.

* HAVING now comes before ORDER BY, which most databases seem to
  prefer.  If your database wants HAVING after ORDER BY, please
  let us know.

* Symbol#qualify now exists, to specify the table name for a given
  symbol, similar to the use of #as to specify an alias.  This is
  mainly helpful in conjuction with the #join_table block, as that
  provides the table aliases to use to qualify the columns inside
  the block.

* BitwiseMethods (&, |, ^, ~, <<, >>) have been added to the
  NumericExpression class, so you can do the following:

  (x + 1) ^ 10  # SQL: (x + 1) ^ 10
  ~(x + 1) # SQL: ~(x + 1)

  Usually, &, |, and ~ operate in a logical manner, but for
  NumericExpressions, they take on their usual bitwise meaning,
  since logical operations only make sense for booleans.

* #cast_numeric and #cast_string exist for Symbols, Strings, and
  other Sequel Expressions, which return the results casted and
  wrapped in either NumericExpression or StringExpression, so you
  can use the BitwiseMethods (&, |, ^, ~, <<, >>) or
  StringConcatenationMethods (+) directly.

# Dataset#to_hash can take only one argument, in which case it uses
  that argument to specify the key, and uses the entire hash for the
  value.

# Dataset#graph can now take an array of columns to select from the
  joined table via the :select option.

# Dataset#filter and similar methods now combine the block and
  regular argument conditions if both are given, instead of ignoring
  the regular argument conditions.

# Dataset#filter(false) can now be used to make sure that no records
  are returned.  Dataset#filter(true) also works, but it's a no-op.
  Before, these raised errors.

# Dataset#count does a subquery for a dataset using DISTINCT, since
  the otherwise it would yield a count for the query without
  DISTINCT.

ParseTree Support Officially Deprecated
---------------------------------------

The support for ParseTree-based block filters has officially been
deprecated and will be removed in Sequel 2.2.  To use the
expression filters (which don't require ParseTree) inside blocks,
use:

  SEQUEL_NO_PARSE_TREE = true
  require 'sequel'
  # OR
  require 'sequel'
  Sequel.use_parse_tree = false

This is the default if ParseTree cannot be loaded.  If ParseTree
can be loaded, it remains the default, in order not to immediately
break existing code.

With this set, you can use the expression filters inside of blocks:

  dataset.filter{((:x + 1) & 10 < :y) & :z}

That doesn't gain you all that much, but there are some methods
that feed block arguments into filter, such as the following:

  dataset.first(5){((:x + 1) & 10 < :y) & :z}

Which will get you the first 5 records matching the condition.

Backwards Incompatible Changes
------------------------------

* To change the datetime classe used from Time to DateTime, you
  now use:

    Sequel.datetime_class = DateTime # instead of Sequel.time_class

* Models now raise errors if you try to access a missing or
  restricted method via new/set/update, instead of just silently
  skipping that parameter.  To get the old behavior:

    Sequel::Model.strict_param_setting = false

* The association_dataset method now takes into account the :eager
  option and the block argument, where it didn't before. It also
  takes into account the new :limit option.

* Association methods now raise errors in most cases if the model
  doesn't have a valid primary key.

* Dataset#join_table used to allow a symbol as a conditions argument
  as a shortcut for a hash:

    DB[:artist].join(:albums, :artist_id)
    # ON albums.artist_id = artists.id

  With the changes to #join_table, this no longer works.  It would
  now be interpreted as a boolean column:

    DB[:artist].join(:albums, :artist_id)
    # ON artists.id

  Use the following slightly longer version for the old behavior:

    DB[:artist].join(:albums, :artist_id=>:id)
    # ON albums.artist_id = artists.id

* MySQL users need to be careful when upgrading, the following code
  will once again cause an error:

    DB[:artists].each{|artist| DB[:albums].each{|album| ...}}

  To fix it, change the code to:

    DB[:artists].all{|artist| DB[:albums].each{|album| ...}}

  The issue is the MySQL adapter doesn't release the database
  connection while running each, and the second call to each gets the
  same database connection (while the other query is still running),
  because it is in the same thread.  Using #all for the outside query
  ensures that the database connection is released before the block is
  called.

  The reason for this change was that the workaround provided for
  MySQL could potentially cause issues with transactions for all
  adapters.

* String#asc and String#desc are no longer defined, as ordering on a
  plain string column should be a no-op.  They are still defined
  on LiteralStrings.

* You can no longer abuse the SQL::Function syntax to use a table
  alias with specified columns (e.g. :table[:col1, :col2, :col3])
  or to cast to types (e.g. :x.cast_as(:varchar[20])).  Use a
  LiteralString in both cases.

If you have any questions, please post on the Google Group.

Thanks,
Jeremy

* {Source code}[http://github.com/jeremyevans/sequel]
* {Bug tracking}[http://code.google.com/p/ruby-sequel/issues/list]
* {Google group}[http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk]
* {RDoc}[http://sequel.rubyforge.org]
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In This Thread

Prev Next