From: Matthew Moss <matthew.moss@...>
Date: 2008-06-08T13:11:35+09:00
Subject: Re: Preferable Pairs (#165)

> > Example B output:
> > David John
> > Walter Evan
> > Hank Gail
>
> I think that scores 26.  A score of 18 is achievable (see below),
> although I don't know if it's optimal.  With only 15 (I think)
> potential partnership schemes when there are six people, it could be
> verified, although I haven't done it.
>
> David Evan
> Hank John
> Gail Walter

Correct you are, sir. My algorithm is greedy, but after a certain
transform was done, which I had hoped would make greedy acceptable. I
guess not.

Back to the drawing board...