From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2008-06-20T15:18:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Why metaclasses?

On 20.06.2008 00:27, James Coglan wrote:
> So far I can't see how this is inconsistent with using metamodules instead
> of metaclasses, and with class inheritance being a special case of module
> inclusion. With apologies for my apparent slow-wittedness, what am I
> missing?

Your quote: "Given that you cannot instantiate them [...]". :-)

Kind regards

	robert