From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2008-06-03T00:07:33+09:00
Subject: The dark side of the duck

2008/6/2 Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:04 AM, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:
>> On Friday 30 May 2008 08:12:35 Mark Wilden wrote:
>>
>>> If classes are not categories, what are they?
>>
>> Classes are categories. But not all categories are classes.
>
> IMHO this is a gross generalization!
>
> I guess that you might indeed use Ruby classes as categories in your
> designs. I do not know what others do, but the simple fact that I use
> Ruby classes for other things falsifies your statement. BTW,
> performance apart, I can perfectly life without classes in Ruby.

I felt it was time to change the subject of the thread. ;-)

Cheers

robert


PS: I had to do too much concentrated work today so I HAD to change to
silly mode.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

-- 
use.inject do |as, often| as.you_can - without end